Rand Paul KO’s Fauci in the first round

No, he didn’t, 61, another ridiculous take on an issue. This guy couldn’t get certified, so he self certified. The medical community laughs at Paul.




This is untrue, it had to do with how they gave lifetime certifications he and 200 other's created a better certification, so no, he's not self certified. The medical community, you speak for them?

I haven't found the same among my peers.
 
B117 as of the end of February was 10% of US cases up from 3% a few weeks before. Rand was talking nonsense because viruses don't stop spreading simply because Rand speaks. Viruses also don't care if you are British or American when it comes to infecting you or killing you. The fact that B117 makes up 10% of US cases says that within a few weeks it will likely be making up 10% of US deaths. Since B117 spreads easier it will only increase as a percent of cases and percent of deaths. This is some pretty basic stuff here that Rand doesn't seem to be aware of which is surprising since he supposedly graduated with a degree in medicine.



No one, not even Dr. Paul suggested that the virus stops because he speaks, he pointed out correctly that no one has been hospitalized by any of the variants here in the us.


And yes, like the J&J vaccine is less effective in europe than the US, there are indeed differences between the populations. Also you have a very convenient timeline. It was supposed to be the dominant strain by march.

what number do you have? 10%?

and now the vaccine is becoming ubiquitous?


https://www.statnews.com/2021/01/15/covid19-b117-variant-cdc/


I think you need further study.
 
This is untrue, it had to do with how they gave lifetime certifications he and 200 other's created a better certification, so no, he's not self certified. The medical community, you speak for them?

I haven't found the same among my peers.
3. His ophthalmology certification is contested. He originally earned board certification in 1993 after the completion of his residency. However, in 1997 he formed his own board, called the National Ophthalmology Board, with 200 other physicians in protest of certification requirement changes by the American Board of Ophthalmologists. The now-defunct board was not recognized by the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, so Dr. Paul was not board certified by a board recognized by the state since 2005, and since Dr. Paul's board dissolved in 2011, he has had no certification from an active body, according to the Washington Post. Kentucky state law does not require board certification for licensure.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.c...d-paul-s-medical-career-healthcare-views.html
 
3. His ophthalmology certification is contested. He originally earned board certification in 1993 after the completion of his residency. However, in 1997 he formed his own board, called the National Ophthalmology Board, with 200 other physicians in protest of certification requirement changes by the American Board of Ophthalmologists. The now-defunct board was not recognized by the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, so Dr. Paul was not board certified by a board recognized by the state since 2005, and since Dr. Paul's board dissolved in 2011, he has had no certification from an active body, according to the Washington Post. Kentucky state law does not require board certification for licensure.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.c...d-paul-s-medical-career-healthcare-views.html




It seems character assassination takes precedence over content. What did he get wrong in the exchange with Dr. Fauci?


I don't care to debate his certification, he went to medical school, and has an MD, completed his residency and practiced for 20 years, and is a Dr.
 
It seems character assassination takes precedence over content. What did he get wrong in the exchange with Dr. Fauci?


I don't care to debate his certification, he went to medical school, and has an MD, completed his residency and practiced for 20 years, and is a Dr.
LOL, it’s interesting you wanted to debate it till proven wrong. Have a nice day.
 
Why would a doctor whose specialty is immunology be less believable than an ophthalmologist? Here are two links for you to compare.

Rand Paul

Anthony Fauci


There was a vigorous debate in the early days in the UK over the best course of action. Have you heard of Prof. Sunetra Gupta who advocated a vastly different approach to that of Neil Ferguson they are both highly qualified immunologists.

Ferguson was wildly wrong with his predictions especially regarding Sweden. There's only right way to install a ball cock but calculating R values is a tad more complex!
 
I would love to debate, you seem to want to talk about all things paul except his words which are the subject if this discussion, Pura Vida!
Credentials are important in medicine. Rand is out of his league. Fauci is trained in this area. Rand is grandstanding. Have a nice day.
 
It's a purely partisan comment.

Ben Carson was literally a brain surgeon.... literally, and the liberals still insisted he was a boob.

BTW Mr. Legion, why can't I "thank" your posts?

I had my thanks button removed by a board-certified Internet surgeon.
 
I would love to debate, you seem to want to talk about all things paul except his words which are the subject if this discussion, Pura Vida!

All this talk about credentials whilst important are not the be all and end all. Richard Feynman wasn't a rocket engineer, yet at the enquiry into the failure of the Challenger shuttle he spotted that the O-rings lost their elasticity at low temperature. Something that both NASA and Morton Thiokol denied yet he was right and they were wrong!
 
Credentials are important in medicine. Rand is out of his league. Fauci is trained in this area. Rand is grandstanding. Have a nice day.



I'm still waiting for you to tell me what Rand was wrong about. I have already shown what Anthony was wrong about. It's always a nice day here in paradisio!


If you have no desire to debate or discuss that's fine.
 
Back
Top