Rand Paul (R), is a grandstanding smuck, using the lives of heros for politics.

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/23/rand-paul-hillary-clinton_n_2534120.html


Seriously todays questioning of Sec. of State Clinton has made her election to the presidency in four years MUCH more likely. She has been called in to answer to the most unpopular political institution in the United States, and they dance on the graves of those American Heros who were killed in Lybia, just to score political points and position themselves for future political attacks.


I am proud of S. of S. Clinton for now calling him out on it. I could not have been so professional.

It was enough to bring me back to the board. I missed you guys. Hope this thread is not burried into its own catagory hidden away somewhere.
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/23/rand-paul-hillary-clinton_n_2534120.html


Seriously todays questioning of Sec. of State Clinton has made her election to the presidency in four years MUCH more likely. She has been called in to answer to the most unpopular political institution in the United States, and they dance on the graves of those American Heros who were killed in Lybia, just to score political points and position themselves for future political attacks.


I am proud of S. of S. Clinton for now calling him out on it. I could not have been so professional.

It was enough to bring me back to the board. I missed you guys. Hope this thread is not burried into its own catagory hidden away somewhere.


What did he say that was 'dancing on the graves of those killed in Libya'???
 
What did he say that was 'dancing on the graves of those killed in Libya'???

I posted the link to his grandstanding. His job at that hearing was to ask questions, instead he went on a rant with no related question.
 
and Hillary shouts, "Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night decided to go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?"

wtf difference does it make ?....Really ?

What difference does it make that our State Dept. is ignorant to whats going on in one of the most dangerous and threatening countrys of the world to Americans....?
Even after being repeatedly ask to provide more security for the Ambassador and they ignored those requests....?
The Democrats in that hearing might just as well line to kiss her ass and get it over with instead of wasting air time with inane questions and speeches of her holiness.

What difference indeed.
 
I posted the link to his grandstanding. His job at that hearing was to ask questions, instead he went on a rant with no related question.

There was no 'walking on the graves' or anything of the sort. He questioned Clintons leadership at State and the failure of the leadership to provide security etc...

So explain... what is it specifically that you think warranted such and attack by you on Paul?
 
It was enough to bring me back to the board. I missed you guys. Hope this thread is not burried into its own catagory hidden away somewhere.

welcome back bro, glad to have you.

Please don't be so passive aggressive though. It's unbecoming.
 
I am no fan of Rand Paul. He's the same moron his father is.

That being said ..

"Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night decided to go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?"

The difference is, that's a lie .. a gigantic one.

A protest or guys out for a walk has nothing to do with the truth.

It was an armed and well-staged attack that blocked off tthe streets and escape routes.

If Rand Paul had a brain, there was his argument .. one that he didn't pursue.

It was an attack by the Green Resistance .. which still attacks the puppet government.

The bullshit lie the Obama Administration wants everyone to believe is that the Libyans welcomed that NATO and Obama destruction of their country.

These hearings are a farce.

Occupation Regime Prime Minister warns of tough action after deadly clashes in Tripoli
Tripoli, 10 January 2013

The Puppet Prime Minister of the Illegal Occupation Regime seeking to rule Libya unsuccessfully after 2 years of trying, Ali Zeidan, has warned yet again that lawlessness will not be tolerated with the appeal to give an easy time for the Euromerican capitalists and local “rat” allies falling on deaf ears.

The “government”, he has said, was moving forward in the building of state institutions but there were “some entities” which wanted Libya to remain in chaos “in order for them to accomplish their interests”. He did not specify who he had in mind but said that the government would “not allow any obstacles to hinder our work or stop us”.

However it is well known that the 95% of Libyans who want the return of the Jamahiriya socialism and direct democracy and the active popular resistance are hindering efforts and will not cease putting up a fight until Libya is free of what they call the “rats” — the 5% reactionaries who have brought chaos and destruction.

With an estimated 60,000 killed in the war to occupy Libya and install the puppet regime (after admission by the “rats” that they lost only 4,000 and not 50,000 as previously claimed), and around 10,000 political prisoners, and one million Libyans — almost a quarter of the population — forced into exile, this is not surprising.

Traitor Zeidan’s comments, made at a “cabinet” meeting on Wednesday, followed days of disturbances in Tripoli in which several people died and were injured during pitched gun battles.

The clashes reignited on Monday when, following the death of an alleged drugs dealer from the capital’s Fashloum district, angry locals attacked the militia supposedly responsible for his death, while youngsters armed with machine guns closed roads in the area.
According to Rat Interior Ministry Undersecretary Omar El Khadrawi, the dead man had been killed — “unlawfully” he said — by a support unit linked to the SSC commanded by Abdel-Raouf Karrah based at Mitiga airbase. (here is the link from the Libyan Herald which lets not forget it belongs to MI6= London Times-
http://www.libyaherald.com/2013/01/...rugs-across-north-africa-claims-special-unit/)

He did not name the unit but Karrah is head of the Nawasi brigade, widely viewed in Tripoli as Islamist.
Possibly because there was no response from the police, army or SSC at the time, since these are all tied up trying to keep the would-be rulers of Libya safe and overwhelmed by crime in general — the murder rate is up 500% in the past 2 years even according to the massaged figures of the regime — the lawlessness quickly spread, resulting in the deaths of at least two more people.

Khadrawi said that one man, who, he named by as Mohamed Albuashi, was killed in a clash in the area of Ghrarat, Suk-Jumua. An unspecified support unit then managed to calm tempers but while it was on its way back to base, it was attacked by the Ejadida prison near Fornaj. In the fighting, one man was killed and five others wounded, one of them seriously. This, Khadrawi said, ratcheted up tensions in the Fashloum and Belkhair areas from where locals then went and attacked Karrah’s base at Mitiga airport.

The Prime Rat Minister has announced that Karrah is to be questioned. He said that he will be held accountable if there is a case against him.
Responding to Khadrawi’s call for an end to public lawlessness, the illegal occupation regime’s so-called SSC (“Supreme Security Committee”) in Tripoli yesterday announced it would take action against anyone closing roads, causing harm to the public or damaging private or public property. In particular it called on parents to take control of their children and prevent them from causing such damage to property.
http://libyaagainstsuperpowermedia....yan-liberation-front/libyan-green-resistance/
 
Last edited:
There was no 'walking on the graves' or anything of the sort. He questioned Clintons leadership at State and the failure of the leadership to provide security etc...

So explain... what is it specifically that you think warranted such and attack by you on Paul?

I showed you the link to the footage, if you cant see it, no amount of explaining by me will explain it to you. He was using dead Americans to make political points.
 
I showed you the link to the footage, if you cant see it, no amount of explaining by me will explain it to you. He was using dead Americans to make political points.

Must be an epidemic going around the liberals on this board seem to have all come down with it.

The 'It is out there go find it' is not backing your position. It is not providing evidence of what you claim. It is a pathetic waste of time.
 
Must be an epidemic going around the liberals on this board seem to have all come down with it.

The 'It is out there go find it' is not backing your position. It is not providing evidence of what you claim. It is a pathetic waste of time.

Seriously, you are so silly, I gave you the entire link.
 
If the Libyan people were as supportive of NATO as claimed .. why hasn't there been a real government established?

Why do they hide in Benghazi and run away from Tripoli?

The resistance rolls on ..

Report: Benghazi security chief killed by gunmen
http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/21/world/africa/libya-violence/index.html

Libya roils: Gunmen kill four policemen in Benghazi
http://www.firstpost.com/fwire/libya-roils-gunmen-kill-four-policemen-in-benghazi-559551.html

Gumen kill Libyan Army General who Conspired with NATO
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-19220027

Head of Libya’s GNC escapes assassination attempt
http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2013/01/06/258878.html
 
Seriously, you are so silly, I gave you the entire link.

and nowhere in that link did he do any such thing... which is why I asked you to point to what it is specifically that you are referring to. Do you understand that is how you can convince people of your position? By describing what you are talking about in detail? So that they may either agree or disagree?

If I stated 'Hillary came off as trouncing on the graves of those that died'... and you wanted more detail... would you accept an answer of 'its there... go watch'???
 
and nowhere in that link did he do any such thing... which is why I asked you to point to what it is specifically that you are referring to. Do you understand that is how you can convince people of your position? By describing what you are talking about in detail? So that they may either agree or disagree?

If I stated 'Hillary came off as trouncing on the graves of those that died'... and you wanted more detail... would you accept an answer of 'its there... go watch'???

I belive almost the entire portion where the dude was talking was him dancing on the graves of those heros. You can watch it and have a different position, I understand that.
 
Ok, I will play your game...

What does Rand Paul (R) stating that he would have fired Secretary Clinton have anything to do with the hearings? All it was is a pittafull attempt to attain some dominance over her. Flesh out facts or dont, but the editoralizing is dancing on those graves for political grandstanding.
 
Ok, I will play your game...

What does Rand Paul (R) stating that he would have fired Secretary Clinton have anything to do with the hearings? All it was is a pittafull attempt to attain some dominance over her. Flesh out facts or dont, but the editoralizing is dancing on those graves for political grandstanding.

Oh I agree it was grandstanding and it was

A) freaking awesome. I loved watching her squirm
B) no different from what any politician has ever done during these types of hearings

I guess you think this is the first time a politician was grandstanding. Selective poutrage?
 
Oh I agree it was grandstanding and it was

A) freaking awesome. I loved watching her squirm
B) no different from what any politician has ever done during these types of hearings

I guess you think this is the first time a politician was grandstanding. Selective poutrage?

No, we need to get politicians who are different, Rand Paul (R) pretends to be different, thats his brand. He aint.
 
Back
Top