Rasmussen Reports Unemployment Update

volsrock1

Verified User
Rasmussen Real Unemployment Rate: Again, Double the Official Rate...

National unemployment was 8.7% in this month’s Rasmussen Reports Real Unemployment update, up from 8.4% last month and significantly more than double the 4.1% rate officially reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics today.





WHOOPS
 
Rasmussen Real Unemployment Rate: Again, Double the Official Rate...

National unemployment was 8.7% in this month’s Rasmussen Reports Real Unemployment update, up from 8.4% last month and significantly more than double the 4.1% rate officially reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics today.





WHOOPS
The Government NEVER lies! :rofl2:
 
I have no idea how correct this information is, but I know beyond doubt that the Regimes numbers have long been fraud.
 
Rasmussen Real Unemployment Rate: Again, Double the Official Rate...

National unemployment was 8.7% in this month’s Rasmussen Reports Real Unemployment update, up from 8.4% last month and significantly more than double the 4.1% rate officially reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics today.





WHOOPS
A little more objective reporting reveals Rasmussen's penchant for skewing towards the neocon/teabagger/maga/fibbetarian/alt-right side of things. Case in point: www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/oct/08/kamala-harris/kamala-harris-on-60-minutes-said-unemployment-is-a/#:~:text=The%20unemployment%20rate%20for%20these%20groups

"Whoops" indeed!
 
Rasmussen Real Unemployment Rate: Again, Double the Official Rate...

National unemployment was 8.7% in this month’s Rasmussen Reports Real Unemployment update, up from 8.4% last month and significantly more than double the 4.1% rate officially reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics today.





WHOOPS
Rasmussen refuses to release their methods and data for this poll. Refusing to release that is a sign the poll is not properly conducted.
 
Starting about 20 years ago I was getting told that the numbers tend to not mean with we are told that they mean, via some combination of incompetence of the experts and lying.....these days the numbers are straight up fraudulent....they are a part of the Regimes narrative construction.
 
How they call people is not methodology of how they calculate their results. It doesn't tell us how many people were called, how many answered or what the questions were, let alone how they calculated the results based on who answered.
I see no credible source saying that they are not transparent to industry standards.
 
I see that 538 gives them a low transparency score (3.3/10), but I note that I no longer think much of 538....and I am sure that public polls are now in the main fiction.
 
Back
Top