Reality check for neocons

Jeff, since he called you "Jeffy" call him Libby and don't let up. If he whines about it the tell him that he opened the door. He hates that.

Nor let on that I told you. :)

one good thing about being on ignore..we can talk about him and he would never know it...I never knew his name was Libby..:cof1:
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Stop chuckling like a clown and THINK before you type, Jeffy. Beyond the neocon sore loser whinings, supposition and conjecture, neither you or any other blogger has any legitimate proof that the 2008 election was anything but fair and square. If you did, media neocon punditry would have been screaming it from the mount on high.

Like I said, the other neocon dimbulbs don't have the guts or brains to address the points in the opening post on this thread, which is why I have them on IA. Are you different, or are you just blowing smoke?

Libby , LOL, for the most part you are correct, I only know for a fact of a few illegal things that went down and they wouldn't of been enough to make a difference anyway
But having Black Panthers at the polling sites in Philly isn't so fair is it libby

Still blowing smoke chuckles? What exactly did these folk do....did they intimidate voters while wearing '70's uniforms? Rig the voting machines? Threaten voters? Come, come my good woman....give me some FACTS beyond dropping names that will prove your case. I can point to specific ACTS by former Ohio and Florida Secty of State that directly affected voters. Put up or shut up.

How about acorn liby, ya think they did it all on the up and up ?

Get up to speed, Jeffy.....we've already had investigations that PROVED BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT that Acorn, for all it's faults, reported any attempts to register fake names by workers, and NO FAKE NAMES were used to cast a legit vote. This is old hat, Jeffy.....:palm:

Now, anything else you want to say about the opening post on this thread?
 
Ya don't reckon Libby was a pet name for him by a ex lover do ya? LOL

No, it's something that Southie used because he thought that calling me a Liberal was an insult. Actually, "libby" could be a derivative for the "liberal" in my screen name "Taichiliberal".

Bottom line: neocon numbskulls like Southie, meme, bravo, the loyal end, yurt have been soundly defeated in debates with me. Frustrated, they just follow me around and try to spam the thread with all types of silly off topic dodges and other nonsense based on personal attacks because they just can't debate worth a damn beyond a certain point....pity the fools don't realize that once on IA, I only see their names, not the posts...unless others quote them in a reply. If you want to join the ranks of the stooges and follow suit, so be it.
 
Get up to speed, Jeffy.....we've already had investigations that PROVED BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT that Acorn, for all it's faults, reported any attempts to register fake names by workers, and NO FAKE NAMES were used to cast a legit vote. This is old hat, Jeffy.....:palm:

Now, anything else you want to say about the opening post on this thread?

Ya forgot to comment on the Black Panthers Libby

And did ya really think Acorn would be investigated correctly , but as I said he won by to big a margin anyway so it didn't matter, just wanted you to admit it wasn't completely legit, but I knew ya wouldn't Libby
 
that's one hell of an ego to think all them people would wish to follow him around..
but when you have half the board on ignore, I guess you can pretty much make up anything you want and believe it...:cof1:
 
Last edited:
No, it's something that Southie used because he thought that calling me a Liberal was an insult. Actually, "libby" could be a derivative for the "liberal" in my screen name "Taichiliberal".

Bottom line: neocon numbskulls like Southie, meme, bravo, the loyal end, yurt have been soundly defeated in debates with me. Frustrated, they just follow me around and try to spam the thread with all types of silly off topic dodges and other nonsense based on personal attacks because they just can't debate worth a damn beyond a certain point....pity the fools don't realize that once on IA, I only see their names, not the posts...unless others quote them in a reply. If you want to join the ranks of the stooges and follow suit, so be it.

Lighten up Libby, hell it is all in fun
 
that's one hell of an ego to think all them people would wish to follow him around..
but when you have half the board on ignore, I guess you can pretty much make up anything you want and believe it...:cof1:

LOL, Libby is a important guy I can tell, LOL
 
Get up to speed, Jeffy.....we've already had investigations that PROVED BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT that Acorn, for all it's faults, reported any attempts to register fake names by workers, and NO FAKE NAMES were used to cast a legit vote. This is old hat, Jeffy.....:palm:

Now, anything else you want to say about the opening post on this thread?

here Libby
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhXA3fXpCFk"]YouTube- We Will Not Be Silenced Promo Clips[/ame]
 
No, it's something that Southie used because he thought that calling me a Liberal was an insult. Actually, "libby" could be a derivative for the "liberal" in my screen name "Taichiliberal".

Bottom line: neocon numbskulls like Southie, meme, bravo, the loyal end, yurt have been soundly defeated in debates with me. Frustrated, they just follow me around and try to spam the thread with all types of silly off topic dodges and other nonsense based on personal attacks because they just can't debate worth a damn beyond a certain point....pity the fools don't realize that once on IA, I only see their names, not the posts...unless others quote them in a reply. If you want to join the ranks of the stooges and follow suit, so be it.

Actually, you called me Southie based on my screen name so I called you Libby based on yours. It also does triple duty because it feminizes you along with being a liberal, which is an insult.

And, actually, you have never won a debate me or the others that you have on ignore. That is, unless your measure of winning is to ignore us. The fact is, when you put us on IA we win! :)
 
Actually, you called me Southie based on my screen name so I called you Libby based on yours. It also does triple duty because it feminizes you along with being a liberal, which is an insult.

And, actually, you have never won a debate me or the others that you have on ignore. That is, unless your measure of winning is to ignore us. The fact is, when you put us on IA we win! :)

I see, so Libby declares victory if he places you on ignore, LOL, sounds like the name fits him very well
 
Libby declares victory with his first response. When he continually gets blasted with facts that tell the lie to his assertion then he puts you on ignore. :)
 
Libby declares victory with his first response. When he continually gets blasted with facts that tell the lie to his assertion then he puts you on ignore. :)
Hmm.. I didn't know he put people on ignore. I see a pattern where he doesn't actually provide any information but says he does while tossing ad homs.

Basically the conversation goes like this.

<Conservative Poster>: Says something about his opinion, links to an article.

<TaichiLiberal>: Throws out an ad hom and adds a link that doesn't say what he says it does.

<CP>: Points out his link doesn't say what he says it does, even provides quotes.

<TCL>: Throws out a few more ad homs and then says he's proven something he has been shown not to have proved.

<CP>: Once again, providing quotes and the same link again, points out that his link doesn't say what he says it said and asks for him to quote anything that actually supports his position.

<TCL>: Links back to a post where he ad hommed a person and provided no links or evidence of his position, then throws out some more ad homs....

And so forth...
 
.

You don't even have the courage to address the points in the opening post on this thread. Once again, you demonstrate that your ass is indeed in your hat.

Thats really funny stuff....libby talks about "courage to address his points"
when he,himself doesn't have the balls to even read to posts of others....
let alone respond to their points...


:rofl::yermom::rofl:
 
Last edited:
Ya forgot to comment on the Black Panthers Libby



And did ya really think Acorn would be investigated correctly , but as I said he won by to big a margin anyway so it didn't matter, just wanted you to admit it wasn't completely legit, but I knew ya wouldn't Libby

No I didn't forget your neocon mantra about the BP, I put it in bold red....obviously some folk can't read any insert into a quote..and I say SOME because others have had no problem. Here's the response:

Still blowing smoke chuckles? What exactly did these folk do....did they intimidate voters while wearing '70's uniforms? Rig the voting machines? Threaten voters? Come, come my good woman....give me some FACTS beyond dropping names that will prove your case. I can point to specific ACTS by former Ohio and Florida Secty of State that directly affected voters. Put up or shut up.

As to your insipid stubborness about Acorn...catch what you are saying. You just reject that Acorn was NOT found guilty of voter fraud...which is stupid because to date NO ONE on either side of the political fence has logically of factually proven that Acorn got a FALSE NAME registered a vote in the 2008 election for Obama. Your "logic" in this instance is that "Well, he won with a good margin, so there must have been cheating".
:palm:
Carry on.
 
Lighten up Libby, hell it is all in fun

I'd buy that if I could get a decent debate based on facts and logic. Sure they'll be the occasional dust up because the topics hit home on personal level...but when I get condescending attitudes, personal attacks, and usage of supposition/conjecture as fact...it's hard to keep civil. A lot of topics here are serious...these boards can be used to blow off steam, get/give information and discuss topics. I remain civil until someone else does not. A lot of folk came over from the old AOL boards and brought along bad blood...I'll try to avoid them.

I'm willing to start anew if you are.
 

Bottom line: was there ANY proof that the number of ballots cast in the final tally of the 2008 election exceeded the number of legitimately registered voters in any state? Was there ANY proof that a FAKE name that was registered under Acorn actually was able to cast a vote?

To date: No Republican congressman or Senator has stated that people in their districts/consituency has valid proof of this.

All you've given me here is a collection of unsubstantiated accusations, opinions, supposition and conjecture.
 
I see, so Libby declares victory if he places you on ignore, LOL, sounds like the name fits him very well



Stop laughing and pay attention.....as I read above your response, the buffoon tries to deny what I wrote about him, and then goes right ahead and proves that what I said was true...that his main intent for calling me Libby because he thought being a liberal is insulting. If it were just a trade in nick names, then the "insult" part of would not have entered his tiny fevered brain. Southie is a liar, plain and simple...yet he's too dumb to keep from exposing his own lies.

I placed him and others on ignore because when they can't win a debate, they start lying about what previously transpired, repeat themselves, try to change the subject, and go on the personal attack. No sense in wasting time scrolling through that bullshit. When time has passed, I give them another chance at a civil debate. Time will tell.

If you want to swallow what Southie says, be my guest....other posters have had the same problem with him.
 
Back
Top