Reality: Homosexual Marriage

USFREEDOM911 said:
You're not being forced to do so; but if you plan ahead, it will allow you to be better prepared.
Plus if you're prepared, it might save you from needing professional help when the Supreme Court rules that same sex marriages are legal and that they are to be recognized; in every State.
Click to expand...

not likely to happen, unless one of the conservative judges drops dead from a heart attack before Obama gets replaced......
 
Southern Man said:
The federal government isn't instituting marriage licenses. Marriage is in accordance with State constitutions, and depending on the State, they may choose to recognize a theological basis or not.

HIV is merely one of the problems with queers, Damo. The main issue that I have with queer marriage is that it forces society to lie to children and claim that it is normal moral natural and healthy.
Click to expand...

The federal gov't doesn't instituting marriage licences. But it does offer hundreds of benefits to married couples. Recognizing a theological basis is unconstitutional. but, for the sake of argument, lets suppose it is acceptable. What religion do you use for the theological basis?

No one is forcing you to lie to children about anything. You can tell your children anything you want about homosexuality. But the fact is that being normal, moral, natural and/or healthy has nothing to do with marriage. And until you apply those standards to heterosexual marriages, it is just bigotry sanctioned by the gov't.
 
Southern Man said:
Not only is the gay rights movement upfront in its desire to legitimize sex with children, but whether indexed by population reports of molestation, pedophile convictions, or teacher-pupil assaults, there is a strong, disproportionate association between child molestation and homosexuality. ... The assertion by gay leaders and the American Psychological Association that a homosexual is less likely than a heterosexual to molest children is patently false.

http://www.familyresearchinst.org/2009/02/child-molestation-and-homosexuality-2/
Click to expand...

Not relevant to the discussion. Allowing civil unions or marriages between gays will not change the number of gays. Pedophilia will still be illegal. Pedophiles will still be prosecuted.

This is pandering to fear. A red herring is just another logical fallacy.
 
Southern Man said:
So your link was an ad hom. Awesome fail on your part.

Bisexuals aren't queers? You're nuts.
Click to expand...

Do you even know what the hell "ad hom" means? Where does my link show an attempt to undermine the author's character instead of addressing the argument?
Wasnt your argument about how it is most likely Peds were homosexuals? My link addresses the flaws in composing the faulty information that was used by YOU and the Author to come to that conclusion in your link. So the only Awesome FAILURE is your own flimsy response. I am starting to see that signature line located at the bottom of my post is beginning to apply to you Southern Man as it already has applied to Southern Woman.

Please try and keep up and do better next time.
 
Last edited:
Southern Man said:
Bisexuals aren't queers? You're nuts.
Click to expand...

MY LINK Does not state that-----DOE IT? I know reading comprehension may be difficult for you but the link was pointing out that just because people were classified as Bi-sexuals , that did not automatically make them also likely to molest children. The Author in your link automatically included bisexuals in that category as a part of his findings.

My link countered with-


Quote:
The distinction between a victim's gender and a perpetrator's sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don't really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children – boys, girls, or children of both sexes


AGAIN Please try and keep up and do better next time.
 
Southern Man said:
Are you chocking your chicken thinking about shit like that? :eek:
Click to expand...

Why would you have to block your chicken, to stop it from rolling??

IS0266IX0.jpg
 
WinterBorn said:
The federal gov't doesn't instituting marriage licences. But it does offer hundreds of benefits to married couples. Recognizing a theological basis is unconstitutional. but, for the sake of argument, lets suppose it is acceptable. What religion do you use for the theological basis?

No one is forcing you to lie to children about anything. You can tell your children anything you want about homosexuality. But the fact is that being normal, moral, natural and/or healthy has nothing to do with marriage. And until you apply those standards to heterosexual marriages, it is just bigotry sanctioned by the gov't.
Click to expand...

I can see the conversation now:

"Daddy, why are those two guys holding hands??"
"Because they're immoral non-christians who are damned to hell for eterenity; since they're gay and living a lie by trying to make everyone believe they're in love, like hetrosexual people do."

"Daddy, why does that man's wife have a black eye?"
"Because he slaps her around and beats her up, but that's OK; because they were married in a Church and plus, she probably deserved it for not doing as she was told."
 
Southern Chicken said:
Do you even know what the hell "ad hom" means? Where does my link show an attempt to undermine the author's character instead of addressing the argument?
Wasnt your argument about how it is most likely Peds were homosexuals? My link addresses the flaws in composing the faulty information that was used by YOU and the Author to come to that conclusion in your link. So the only Awesome FAILURE is your own flimsy response. I am starting to see that signature line located at the bottom of my post is beginning to apply to you Southern Man as it already has applied to Southern Woman.

Please try and keep up and do better next time.
Click to expand...

Dude, bisexuals are also queers. Please try and keep up and do better next time.
 
Southern Man said:
The data clearly shows that a queer is more likely to poke a kid than a heterosexual person. Do you deny this?
Click to expand...

Only the data compiled by those that have an agenda to denigrate homosexuals.

Unless you're saying that Priests are homosexuals; but then, that would be wrong also, because they're just pedophiles.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top