charver
You lookin' at my pint?
Queers are much more likely to have sex in public; in parks, highway rest areas and public bathrooms. Its disgusting.
Do you get a lot of that in the Yadkin Valley?
Queers are much more likely to have sex in public; in parks, highway rest areas and public bathrooms. Its disgusting.
obviously I am not the one bringing their sex lives into the courtroom....they are.....don't try to pretend it is me that is not keeping it private....
actually with DADT, they are only kicked out of the military if they choose to take it out of the bedroom....keeping it in the bedroom causes no problems
I agree, for the most part. There are places where greater displays are perfectly acceptable. For instance, if you went into a night club and started bitching about some guy feeling on his girl or kissing her passionately, then you would be out of order. But, nobody really wants to see that on the street.
But the homophobes don't want them to even have a peck, hug or hold hands. They want them back in the closet and this "privacy of your own bedroom" argument is often used for that.
actually with DADT, they are only kicked out of the military if they choose to take it out of the bedroom....keeping it in the bedroom causes no problems
I think what they do in the bedroom is a red herring. Wouldn't people still oppose gay marriage, even if gays didn't have sex and merely connected emotionally?
I suppose you could come to that conclusion.....if you were willing to ignore what actually happened......there were no contracts to ignore until gays went into court seeking to gain legitimacy for contracts that were not recognized under the law......but you just go ahead and paint your picture any way you want, we expect it of you......Of course, you are. You want the courts to ignore their contracts because you don't like what they do in the bedroom.
not under Don't Ask, Don't tell......BS. If anyone finds out they are gay, they are kicked out.
going to court demanding that everyone recognize that their relationship is the equivalent of marriage is more than an invitation.....But being openly gay is not an invitation to their bedrooms anymore than being openly hetero is.
Straight men & women are not forced out of the military for admitting that they have sex with their partner. But gays are. It doesn't require details or graphic comments, just an admission.
it requires not keeping it private, which if I am not mistaken, would be the opposite of private.....
This is because many people who oppose gay marriage cannot separate gay sex from the issue. Its a "gross factor" to them.
Prove this statement or you are just full of shit. By prove it, I mean with statistical facts arrived at by someone other than you. A real sex study. I have been in 3 relationships with women that LOVED public sex. My first wife and I had sex in the back of a station wagon in a mall parking lot. I had a German girl friend that wanted to have sex outdoors ALL THE TIME. We had sex in parks, at lakes, in pools, and even in a stalled elevator. My current wife and I have had sex in a computer closet in an office, in a pool, on a balcony at a club. So I don't believe that gays are any more likely to have public sex than breeders.Queers are much more likely to have sex in public; in parks, highway rest areas and public bathrooms. Its disgusting.
I didn't realize the idea of "don't ask" and "don't tell" were that complicated.....I mean, the goal is to keep it within the privacy of the bedroom, right?.....I guess the definition of "keeping it private" is the question. Does that mean keeping it a secret, or just not making a big deal of it or discussing the details?
If a soldier talks about taking his girlfriend out for dinner and dancing, or if he talks about taking his boyfriend out for dinner and dancing, gets two very different responses. Neither would be what I would consider not keeping their sex life private. But one could get someone kicked out and one would not.
Also, if I put a picture of my girlfriend in my locker with "I love you" from her written on it, that is not sharing what happens in my bedroom. But if a man puts up a picture of his boyfriend with similar sentiments written on it, there are serious consequences. Despite the fact that both show emotional connection not sex.
I suppose you could come to that conclusion.....if you were willing to ignore what actually happened......there were no contracts to ignore until gays went into court seeking to gain legitimacy for contracts that were not recognized under the law......but you just go ahead and paint your picture any way you want, we expect it of you......
not under Don't Ask, Don't tell......
going to court demanding that everyone recognize that their relationship is the equivalent of marriage is more than an invitation.....
Nooooooo........As I've mentioned before, if someone is accused of being gay, they can still be kicked out. That means if I, a NCO, see a guy leave your barracks room, I can accuse you of homosexuality and have you kicked out. It doesn't matter if you actually are or not, you can still be tried and either put in the brig or kicked out.actually with DADT, they are only kicked out of the military if they choose to take it out of the bedroom....keeping it in the bedroom causes no problems
You're trolling SocTeaser. Everyone knows perverts, yourself included, like to have sex in public, and up the ass. I'll not entertain your perversions by citing "real sex studies".Prove this statement or you are just full of shit. By prove it, I mean with statistical facts arrived at by someone other than you. A real sex study. I have been in 3 relationships with women that LOVED public sex. My first wife and I had sex in the back of a station wagon in a mall parking lot. I had a German girl friend that wanted to have sex outdoors ALL THE TIME. We had sex in parks, at lakes, in pools, and even in a stalled elevator. My current wife and I have had sex in a computer closet in an office, in a pool, on a balcony at a club. So I don't believe that gays are any more likely to have public sex than breeders.
No. I was referring to Massachusetts, the Gay State, formerly the Bay State. And of course San Fran Sicko, and lots of other places where the land peters out into the ocean.Do you get a lot of that in the Yadkin Valley?
so the point we were discussing was that it was they gays who took the issue out of the bedroom and into the courtroom......apparently you have chosen to deny that while simultaneously providing me with the date they did it.......nice move....Yeah, the status quo denied homosexuals the right to marry. So? And in the 1993 Hawaii case the courts ruled against the state.
wtf....I didn't attack you anywhere...I am married. That simple statement is not an invitation to my bedroom and does not justify an attack on me because you wish to fantasize about what happens there. That's all you.
You just want to keep them in the closet and stomp on them if they complain, so you have constructed this illogical argument where being openly gay is equivalent to forcing you to watch their sex acts.
No. I was referring to Massachusetts, the Gay State, formerly the Bay State. And of course San Fran Sicko, and lots of other places where the land peters out into the ocean.