Recent Gallup poll has acceptance of gay relations above 50%

  • Thread starter Thread starter WinterBorn
  • Start date Start date
charver said:
Yes, they get everywhere nowadays.

You won't believe this but i saw one on television the other day "talking", but you could tell by the look on his face that he just wanted to have sex right there and then, with children watching and everything.
Click to expand...

Funniest post of the day!!
 
Southern Man said:
You're trolling SocTeaser. Everyone knows perverts, yourself included, like to have sex in public, and up the ass. I'll not entertain your perversions by citing "real sex studies".
Click to expand...
Because there are none. You make shit up and then when called on it fail to prove a single word that drops from your lips like so much shit. You are the most disingenuous debater on this site. I would encourage everyone that knows this to put you on ignore so that ALL you can do is listen to ID and USA tell you what a genius you are. Isolate you from all debate because you don't debate.
 
Socrtease said:
Because there are none. You make shit up and then when called on it fail to prove a single word that drops from your lips like so much shit. You are the most disingenuous debater on this site. I would encourage everyone that knows this to put you on ignore so that ALL you can do is listen to ID and USA tell you what a genius you are. Isolate you from all debate because you don't debate.
Click to expand...
I'm going by my memory of newspaper reports of queers in the rest areas along Rte 3 between Boston and Nashua NH, and in Boston Common when I worked nearby, and down in P-Town MA, and the fact that I've never read anything like that happening widespread with heterosexual folk. This is backed up by common sense that only perverts like you have sex in public, which you freely admit, and the fact that queers are by definition perverts.

So sorry pal but I won't entertain you with your obvious troll. Go lick some bung if you want to get off on that.
 
Southern Man said:
I'm going by my memory of newspaper reports of queers in the rest areas along Rte 3 between Boston and Nashua NH, and in Boston Common when I worked nearby, and down in P-Town MA, and the fact that I've never read anything like that happening widespread with heterosexual folk. This is backed up by common sense that only perverts like you have sex in public, which you freely admit, and the fact that queers are by definition perverts.

So sorry pal but I won't entertain you with your obvious troll. Go lick some bung if you want to get off on that.
Click to expand...
A lie.
 
Socrtease said:
Because there are none. You make shit up and then when called on it fail to prove a single word that drops from your lips like so much shit. You are the most disingenuous debater on this site. I would encourage everyone that knows this to put you on ignore so that ALL you can do is listen to ID and USA tell you what a genius you are. Isolate you from all debate because you don't debate.
Click to expand...

Well ID cited some pretty voluminous references. Being from the Northern California area, fairly close to SF, and having several gay friends, I can tell you that it is very common practice in public restrooms, public buildings, in parks etc for men to engage in sexual acts with other men. Not all would identify themselves as gay, but rather enjoy anal sex from time to time, or a blow job. I don't think men are too particular about how they get a blow job.

We had a huge sting operation many years ago at a bathroom in a local park in the center of a town arresting guys having public sex. San Francisco is riddled with "peephole rooms" where guys can go and errr... "relieve the tensions" of the day.

My friend since the 5th grade, black and gay, tells me the men who come on to him the most and who want to have "discreet" sex with him are men who are by all intents and purposes very macho, married, and the last person you or I would ever imagine remotely close to gay.
 
charver said:
Yes, they get everywhere nowadays.

You won't believe this but i saw one on television the other day "talking", but you could tell by the look on his face that he just wanted to have sex right there and then, with children watching and everything.
Click to expand...
Now I think you are just Anthropomorphizing! I mean, "talking"... please. When have you ever seen one that wasn't obviously wanting to have sex?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
so the point we were discussing was that it was they gays who took the issue out of the bedroom and into the courtroom......apparently you have chosen to deny that while simultaneously providing me with the date they did it.......nice move....
Click to expand...

To fight against discrimination against them based upon their bedroom behavior.

PostmodernProphet said:
wtf....I didn't attack you anywhere...
Click to expand...

I did not say you did. You are arguing that claiming your relationship is like or is a marriage is bringing sex out of the bedroom and into the public. It is not.

I can say I am married without inviting your invasion of my bedroom, as can homosexuals.

PostmodernProphet said:
so, your approach to winning this argument is to pretend that complaining that gays take to court to demand acceptance is the equivalent of voyeurism?.....here's a clue....it's a stupid argument and isn't going to win any debates.....
Click to expand...

What a fucking retard. The point is, that YOU are claiming that asking for equality before the law is the equivalent to exhibitionism. It is not. No one is demanding that you imagine what happens in their bedroom because they tell you they are gay or straight. You are the weirdo taking it as an invitation to fantasize about their sex lives, yet you argue that your discomfort over those fantasies justifies discrimination and the persecution of homosexuals. It does not. You were not invited into their bedrooms.

You want them to hide and keep their mouths shut about the discrimination you support.

You use the "privacy of the bedroom" argument to justify your nonsense and you do so in a way biased against homosexuals.
 
Damocles said:
Now I think you are just Anthropomorphizing! I mean, "talking"... please. When have you ever seen one that wasn't obviously wanting to have sex?
Click to expand...
This brings up a theory I heard one time about gay guys: Males tend to be think about sex more than women, and think about it hundreds of times per day. (As a male myself, I can attest to that.) When faced with a naturally lower sex drive of a compatible female, they feel cheated. So they hook up with a guy instead, who has an equivalent sex drive.
 
Southern Man said:
This brings up a theory I heard one time about gay guys: Males tend to be think about sex more than women, and think about it hundreds of times per day. (As a male myself, I can attest to that.) When faced with a naturally lower sex drive of a compatible female, they feel cheated. So they hook up with a guy instead, who has an equivalent sex drive.
Click to expand...

So men become gay because they are horny?

:rofl:
 
RStringfield said:
I did not say you did. You are arguing that claiming your relationship is like or is a marriage is bringing sex out of the bedroom and into the public. It is not.
Click to expand...

obviously, taking it INTO the courtroom is taking it OUT OF the bedroom.....as we have already established, it was the gays who took it into the courtroom, not the straights...

I can say I am married without inviting your invasion of my bedroom, as can homosexuals.
Click to expand...
\

sure you can, but when you go to the courtroom to try to force me to pay attention to your claims of being married, it isn't me who has taken action.....

What a fucking retard. The point is, that YOU are claiming that asking for equality before the law is the equivalent to exhibitionism. It is not. No one is demanding that you imagine what happens in their bedroom because they tell you they are gay or straight. You are the weirdo taking it as an invitation to fantasize about their sex lives, yet you argue that your discomfort over those fantasies justifies discrimination and the persecution of homosexuals. It does not. You were not invited into their bedrooms.

You want them to hide and keep their mouths shut about the discrimination you support.

You use the "privacy of the bedroom" argument to justify your nonsense and you do so in a way biased against homosexuals.
Click to expand...

silly child....I raise a legitimate argument about it being gays that brought this issue out of "privacy" and all you can argue is that my reaction is due to fantasizing?.....now we can all see what liberals resort to when they have no valid arguments......go play in the street with your little brother till mom calls you for dinner....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top