Maze
Wie boter op zijn hoofd heeft, moet uit de zon bli
Red Hats, Dead Conscience: How MAGA Learned to Love the Smell of Child Predators
The MAGA moral compass has been sold for the price of a cheap red hat and the rush of watching decency bleed out in the gutter.
jillybeanmonet.substack.com
The MAGA moral compass has been sold for the price of a cheap red hat and the rush of watching decency bleed out in the gutter.
This is not politics. This is not patriotism. It is a cult’s cold-blooded pact to protect its idol at any cost, even when the stench of depravity hangs heavy in the air around him. They will spit venom at strangers for far less, but when suspicion lingers near their own leader, suspicion tethered to one of the most vile predators of our time, they pull the shutters closed and call it loyalty. What they call loyalty is cowardice disguised as conviction, a betrayal so profound it rots the very idea of a shared moral code. The children they claim to defend are abandoned without ceremony the moment their safety becomes politically inconvenient. In that betrayal, they tell us everything we need to know about who they are.
Tribal Morality in Its Purest, Ugliest Form
Here, morality is conditional. It is a rationed resource doled out only when it damages the enemy. Epstein’s crimes, grotesque beyond the limits of language, vanish from relevance the second they brush against the man in the hat. Not one question, not one flicker of doubt is allowed to pierce the tribal armour. The faithful do not even allow themselves to feel the unease that any human being with a functioning conscience would recognise.The faintest suggestion of proximity to such depravity should be enough to provoke alarm. Instead, allegiance to the hat outweighs allegiance to the innocent. In their hierarchy, the safety of children is negotiable. Their outrage can be summoned instantly when the accused is a Democrat, but it evaporates into silence when the same accusations drift toward their leader. That silence is not passive. It is a choice. It is a deliberate act of complicity wrapped in the comfort of group loyalty.
When the question is raised, they drag the conversation into the sewage pit of whataboutism. “What about this Democrat? What about that celebrity?” The aim is to drown the accusation until it cannot breathe. It is sabotage. It is the calculated destruction of truth itself. In this movement, defending the leader matters more than defending the innocent, and there is no clearer evidence of moral collapse than that.
Sanctifying the Untouchable
Questioning the leader is forbidden. Even the gentlest probe into his past is treated as treason. He is canonised, his history locked away and guarded not with evidence but with rage. Suggest that even the optics of his association with Epstein deserve examination, and you will be branded a liar, a traitor, or worse.Against their rivals, gossip is holy writ. Anonymous posts, manipulated images, wild conjecture, these are embraced as divine revelations. When the shadow falls across their own, rumour becomes an injustice and suspicion becomes sacrilege. The hypocrisy is not hidden. It is displayed with pride, as if daring anyone to call it out.
This is not justice. It is theatre for the faithful, a morality play staged over the corpse of principle. It is designed to condition them into one unwavering belief: the leader must never be touched. In clinging to that belief, they do more than abandon moral law. They erase it. A society that cannot question power will inevitably serve it, even when that power shares a table with the monstrous.
The Hat as a Talisman Against Accountability
The red hat is no mere campaign emblem. It is a shield against consequence. Wear it, and every accusation is “fake news,” every question is a “dead horse,” every moral concern is a “smear.” It is a visible declaration that the rules of decency apply only to the other side.Its magic is not forged from truth, but from the collective refusal to face it. Millions wear it as armour against the unbearable possibility that they chose poorly. They are not defending the man from guilt. They are defending themselves from shame. In doing so, they send a darker message: morality is not absolute. It is conditional on allegiance. This broken standard invites every predator, opportunist, and abuser to cloak themselves in the same colours, secure in the knowledge that loyalty will buy them immunity. It is not just the leader they protect. It is a system where wrongdoing is excused so long as it wears the right hat.
A Cult Will Burn the World to Avoid Saying “We Were Wrong”
They would watch the foundations of democracy crack before they utter those words. Admitting that their leader’s path crossed too easily with a predator like Epstein would not only tarnish him, it would indict them for defending him in the face of every warning. That truth would shatter their identity, so they do what cowards have always done. They destroy the question before it can be answered.They curse those who ask it. They flood the air with noise until truth suffocates. They sacrifice the safety of the vulnerable to protect the pride of the powerful. Epstein’s crimes are among the most revolting in modern memory, and yet this movement has chosen to treat even the faintest association as irrelevant. That choice is a declaration of war on morality itself.
What they cannot see, or will not admit, is that history will not remember them as patriots. It will remember them as accomplices, their silence indistinguishable from consent, their loyalty indistinguishable from rot. When the reckoning comes, it will not be gentle. It will name them for what they were: the willing protectors of a power that stood in the shadow of evil and pretended not to notice.
If this movement will not hold its own to account, then the rest of us must. No more deference to their delusions. No more pretending that “both sides” share the same moral ground. The line is drawn where the safety of children meets the arrogance of unchecked power, and they have chosen the wrong side of it. The time for hoping they will come to their senses is over. They will not. This is a fight for the soul of decency itself, and every one of us who can still feel outrage has a duty to wield it like a weapon. If they will not drink from the river of truth, then we must flood their streets with it until the very ground beneath them turns to mud.