Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
The parties tend to use their knowledge to select areas that make up districts that are "sure things" for them and try to use that same power to reduce such districts for the other party while they are in power.
What Watermark is trying for is a system that has no "sure things" because the districts would be selected more randomly.
Then what's the point in winning elections? Why not just have the Federal government manage our voting to so that it's fair and randomly distributed? We can have elections where it will always be 50% Democrats and 50% Republicans.
Naaa what Water's suggesting is not only naive, it doesn't make political sense.