Registration WILL lead to CONFISCATION. Don't trust the takers.

Banning assault weapons, is not "banning guns" though. Some cars have been banned too. Ever heard of the Pinto?

People on this board can't "threaten" to ban anything. They can only voice their own ideas.

Cars and car manufacturing are strictly regulated because of how dangerous they can be.
 
It has already been stated why it is a poor analogy.

1) No one is threatening to ban cars. No one is threatening to ban voting. People ARE threatening to ban guns

2) Registering cars has a purpose. Registering to vote has a purpose. Registering guns does NOT have a purpose

Hopefully this sinks in this time.

The OP is about Canada and Grind's trying to say what happened in Canada WILL happen in the US. But there is no legal right to gun ownership in Canada. There's nothing in their Constitution about the right to bear arms. My point is that you have to compare apples to apples. Find another country with the right to bear arms, learn if the people have to register guns, and then see if it led to confiscation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms
 
The OP is about Canada and Grind's trying to say what happened in Canada WILL happen in the US. But there is no legal right to gun ownership in Canada. There's nothing in their Constitution about the right to bear arms. My point is that you have to compare apples to apples. Find another country with the right to bear arms, learn if the people have to register guns, and then see if it led to confiscation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms

Why when it has happened HERE ALREADY?
pPsV6S3.jpg
 
I never said differently, I simply belive some types of weapons and clips, like some type of cars, should not be manufactured.

And because you believe that you can throw away 2 of the 10 Rights enumerated in the constitution?
 
The above is emotive, paranoid nonsense. Many want to ban assault weapons, and have for MANY years prior to Sandy Hook. Your first & second statements taken together are just false - you enjoy making false statements and presenting them as fact.

They are not false statements. Obviously you are too ignorant to comprehend without elaboration. The renewed effort and very vocalized proponents of banning assault weapons is due to a knee jerk reaction to Sandy Hook. Is that better for you?

Because those are false, #3 is completely unfounded. Innocent people are killed by handguns every day. Your paranoia is nothing but slippery slope fearmongering taken to the extreme.

Nonsense. None of those are false. We already have cities that have already banned hand guns Lorax. If you ban the clip size and weapons you want now and another tragedy takes place with a different type of weapon you actually expect us to believe you wont then go after the weapon used in the next tragedy? You are saying that you will realize banning weapons doesn't do anything at that point?
 
Why? If it's the will of the people, you'll just have to deal.

LMAO @ 'the will of the people'...

So if we fear monger the ever living crap out of people on something and convince them to vote our way no matter what the topic it is something you will just 'deal with'???
 
Back
Top