Religious affiliation of American scientists

Cypress said:
ftfy....were one of the belligerent interlocutors who kept insisting to me that anything that isn't testable is never, ever allowed in the field of science.
Click to expand...
If it isn't testable, it is not a theory of science.
Cypress said:
You could have just accepted that I was correct.
Click to expand...
You aren't.
Cypress said:
Instead, it was your fault (along w/your friends ITN and Fredy Figbottom) that I even had to bring up minutia like string theory,
Click to expand...
String theory is not a theory of science. Religion is not science.
Cypress said:
the Copenhagen Interpretation, NielsBohr, Schrodingers Cat.
Click to expand...
Nothing to do with string theory. Pivot fallacy, Buzzword fallacies. Schrodinger's cat is not a theory of science. It has nothing to do with the Bohr model either.
 
gmark77 said:
:cuss:we would have let little Cypress say whatever the fuck he wants to say!:village:
Click to expand...
ftfy, If you, and your friends Fredy Figbottom and ITN had either admitted I was correct, or just kept your mouth shut, you would have never seen me bring up string theory and the Copenhagen Interpretation.

It's entirely your fault that scientific minutia was brought up in this thread. And it's directly the result of scientific illiterates relentlessly insisting that anything and everything that isn't testable is never, ever allowed in the scientific endeavor.
 
Cypress said:
Yes, in part due to 1960s and 1970s Civil Rights laws. I think before that, Jews, Catholics, Muslims could be highly discriminated against in employment.
Click to expand...
Xenophobia, in part, is a survival trait.

IMO, all human beings are born with a bias against "the different". That doesn't make it okay, just understandable.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Xenophobia, in part, is a survival trait.

IMO, all human beings are born with a bias against "the different". That doesn't make it okay, just understandable.
Click to expand...
I don't think I can agree with that, I know as a kid in the 50's ,anti black was drummed into us,I was scared of Blacks clear till I actually met some black people! Then I found they were just like us,except had more pigment!
 
Margot said:
I don't think I can agree with that, I know as a kid in the 50's ,anti black was drummed into us,I was scared of Blacks clear till I actually met some black people! Then I found they were just like us,except had more pigment!
Click to expand...
How does that disagree with my post?

Agreed bias about skin pigment is silly.
 
Cypress said:
ftfy, If you, and your friends Fredy Figbottom and ITN had either admitted I was correct,
Click to expand...
Why? You are not correct.
Cypress said:
or just kept your mouth shut, you would have never seen me bring up string theory and the Copenhagen Interpretation.
Click to expand...
Religion is not science, Cyborg.
Cypress said:
It's entirely your fault that scientific minutia
Click to expand...
Religion is not science.
Cypress said:
was brought up in this thread. And it's directly the result of scientific illiterates
Click to expand...
You can't blame your problem on anybody else, Cyborg.
Cypress said:
relentlessly insisting that anything and everything that isn't testable is never, ever allowed in the scientific endeavor.
Click to expand...
Science is not an endeavor.

A theory of science must be falsifiable. That means it MUST be testable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top