Religious affiliation of American scientists

[Dutch Uncle]

Hallucinations and screaming angrily in ALL CAPS are leading indicators for mental instability!

Agreed. It also indicates a person who is highly emotional, very negative and hates their lives while blaming others for their own problems.

This is the entire purpose of scapegoating and why wannabe dictators use it to rally their poorly educated, mentally unstable and very angry followers. It's an indicator that they are evil people, not Christians as they claim.

It's not a sin to put down evil people although, outside of a civil war, it might be illegal.

 

[Cypress]

Agreed. It also indicates a person who is highly emotional, very negative and hates their lives while blaming others for their own problems.

This is the entire purpose of scapegoating and why wannabe dictators use it to rally their poorly educated, mentally unstable and very angry followers. It's an indicator that they are evil people, not Christians as they claim.

It's not a sin to put down evil people although, outside of a civil war, it might be illegal.

Usually, white Christian nationalists only read material they agree with, which is why they always lose debates against prepared opponents, and then are left screaming angrily at their interlocutors in ALL CAPS rants,

 

[Cypress]

Science is not a buzzword or a placeholder.

When you don't investigate, study, or read about the history of science, you can end up with an 8th grader's understanding of science.

Neutrino and quark were originally placeholder terms for particles that were theoretically postulated, but for which there was no evidence of their existence.

Dark energy is a placeholder term for a process we currently do not understand and have no confirmed mechanistic/physical explanation for.

What is 'accelerating'??

It's a generic term which actually refers to the expansion and stretching of space itself.

The universe has no known boundaries.

No boundaries are needed if space has positive curvature. Space time just bends back on itself.

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

This is why I think your anger blinds you, domer78. There's science and there's philosophy. The fact you are so blind that you can't see the difference is why militant atheists like you and your little pud-pulling friend look stupid, ill-informed and have the maturity of 12-year-old boys.

In short, the scientific method requires conclusions to be repeatable and reproducible, philosophy is opinion. Being human, they are often interlinked.

Example: A scientist has a philosophy believing too many people are angry and stupid. Using the scientific , method, the scientist researches means of detecting stupid, overly emotional people invitro. The detection method needs to be repeatable and reproducible. Once detected, the scientist then, again, uses the scientific method to either cure the problem invitro or abort the misfortunate creature. The results are tested by researching if society becomes more intelligent and less emotional over time.

yes.

but Cypriot.......


authority figures uses opinions of off hour scientists, meaning they're not doing science, as science.



think about it, fuckstick.

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

When you don't investigate, study, or read about the history of science, you can end up with an 8th grader's understanding of science.

Neutrino and quark were originally placeholder terms for particles that were theoretically postulated, but for which there was no evidence of their existence.

Dark energy is a placeholder term for a process we currently do not understand and have no confirmed mechanistic/physical explanation for.

It's a generic term which actually refers to the expansion and stretching of space itself.

No boundaries are needed if space has positive curvature. Space time just bends back on itself.

yes.

which is why all this speculation is worthles naziism.

 

[gmark77]

No, that is completely wrong. Many worlds is not a placeholder. You clearly are not familiar with it.

Yes it is. It is a hypothetical solution to quantum issues.

 

[Cypress]

Yes it is. It is a hypothetical solution to quantum issues.

The Many Worlds interpretation was the subject of Hugh Everett's PhD physics dissertation, so that utterly undermines your claim that anything and everything that isn't testable is never, ever allowed in the field of science.

Many Worlds was literally a physics PhD dissertation.

So you finally agree with me that the profession of science includes hypotheses, thought experiments, scientific ideas and inferences, which may not be conventionally testable. They often act to stimulate discussion, provide insights, interpretation, and guidance.

 

[Into the Night]

You have a serious problem either with lying or hallucinations, don't you?
Screaming at me in ALL CAPS is another hallmark of mental illness.

Mantra 1d. Lame.

I explicitly went out my way to call WIMPs an idea to explain dark matter

You also said it was science, It isn't.

 

[Into the Night]

Mentally ill people only see what the whimsies let them see. Weird!

You oughtta know. There's a reason you're in your mental institution, Sybil.

 

[Into the Night]

Hallucinations and screaming angrily in ALL CAPS are leading indicators for mental instability!

Repetition fallacy (chanting). Mantra 1d. Lame. No argument presented.

 

[Into the Night]

Yes it is. It is a hypothetical solution to quantum issues.

What 'quantum issues'???

 

[Into the Night]

The Many Worlds interpretation was the subject of Hugh Everett's PhD physics dissertation, so that utterly undermines your claim that anything and everything that isn't testable is never, ever allowed in the field of science.

Religion is not science.

Many Worlds was literally a physics PhD dissertation.

Religion is not science.

So you finally agree with me that the profession of science includes hypotheses, thought experiments, scientific ideas and inferences, which may not be conventionally testable. They often act to stimulate discussion, provide insights, interpretation, and guidance.

Science is not a profession. There is no theory of science that is not testable. Repetition fallacy (chanting).

 

[Cypress]

What 'quantum issues'???

He doesn't know, it just sounded good to write it.

Hugh Everett wrote his PhD on the Many World's interpretation because many physicists were never satisfied with the Copenhagen interpretation, and Hugh Everett thought a more logical way to look at the wave function is that it doesn't collapse when a measurement is made, it becomes entangled and splits into all possible outcomes.

 

[Cypress]

Religion is not science!

Religion is not science!

The many worlds interpretation is seriously being considered by world class physicists, none of whom call it a religion.

Schroedinger's cat, Einstein's elevator, Maxwell's demon are all classic scientific thought experiments, which are not conventionally testable, but are famous to students of science because of the scientific insights and inferences they inspired.

Your relentless claim that anything and everything which isn't testable never, ever belongs in the field of science just doesn't pass the laugh test.

 

[gmark77]

The Many Worlds interpretation was the subject of Hugh Everett's PhD physics dissertation, so that utterly undermines your claim that anything and everything that isn't testable is never, ever allowed in the field of science.

Many Worlds was literally a physics PhD dissertation.

So you finally agree with me that the profession of science includes hypotheses, thought experiments, scientific ideas and inferences, which may not be conventionally testable. They often act to stimulate discussion, provide insights, interpretation, and guidance.

Wish you had ever taken a science class.

 

[Into the Night]

When you don't investigate, study, or read about the history of science, you can end up with an 8th grader's understanding of science.

I know the history of many theories of science. You have no clue.

Neutrino and quark were originally placeholder terms for particles that were theoretically postulated, but for which there was no evidence of their existence.

Science is not a neutrino. Science is not a quark. There is evidence for their existence.

Dark energy is a placeholder term for a process we currently do not understand and have no confirmed mechanistic/physical explanation for.

Science is not 'dark energy'. 'Dark energy' is not a process. Science is not religion.

It's a generic term which actually refers to the expansion and stretching of space itself.

What is 'expanding'? The Universe has no known boundaries.

No boundaries are needed

Yes. Boundaries are needed if you are going to talk about 'expanding' or 'stretching' the Universe.

if space has positive curvature.

Space is not a curve.

Space time just bends back on itself.

Space is not a curve. Time is not a curve.

Buzzword fallacies.

 

[Into the Night]

He doesn't know,

Neither do you.

it just sounded good to write it.

Which is what YOU try to do. Kettle fallacy.

Hugh Everett wrote his PhD on the Many World's interpretation because many physicists were never satisfied with the Copenhagen interpretation, and Hugh Everett thought a more logical way to look at the wave function is that it doesn't collapse when a measurement is made, it becomes entangled and splits into all possible outcomes.

Buzzword fallacy. Gibberish. Try English. It works better.

 

[Cypress]

In short, the scientific method requires conclusions to be repeatable and reproducible, philosophy is opinion. Being human, they are often interlinked.

Einstein famously brought philosophical thinking to science. He is universally considered one of history's greatest philosophers of science.

The Einstein-Niels Bohr debates famously broached the philosophical implications of quantum mechanics, and considered whether to consider the Copenhagen interpretation as being epistemological or ontological.

 

[Into the Night]

The many worlds interpretation is seriously being considered by world class physicists, none of whom call it a religion.

Science is not religion. Science isn't a 'world class physicist'. Courtier fallacy.

Schroedinger's cat,

Not science.

Einstein's elevator,

Not science.

Maxwell's demon are all classic scientific thought experiments,

Science isn't thought experiments.

which are not conventionally testable,

A theory of science MUST be falsifiable. That also means it MUST be testable.

but are famous to students of science because of the scientific insights and inferences they inspired.

Science isn't a student. Science isn't a religion.

Your relentless claim that anything and everything which isn't testable never, ever belongs in the field of science just doesn't pass the laugh test.

Science isn't an insult or an argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Wish you had ever taken a science class.

He didn't. Science isn't a class.