Targeting is implicit in bombing; ergo yes, you did say it.
You don't get to declare what is, and what is not a fact. If someone disagrees with you then your above statement is merely your argument which you must support.
Did you mean "fly over" instead of "jet escorts"?
Personally, I thought it was brilliant to have a B-2, the symbol of "Reagan's Defeat of the Soviet Union" greet Putin on American soil.
By holding negotiations while the war proceeds. Trump explained the need for this. Let me guess, you weren't paying attention, right?
Nope. Putin wants the war to end ... on his terms.
You are confused. You really should first find out what is going on.
At one point, yes. Then things changed. He explained all this. You weren't paying attention.
Correct. No ceasefire is desired, only an end to the war.
By Trump not bending to the will of Putin. Let me know if you have any other easy questions.
Says the guy who hasn't been paying attention.
Guess who doesn't know how oligarchies work.
First, "accompanying" is not the word you want to use there. Second, Putin doesn't get what he wants until the war is over. He wants the war over ... just with the territory he feels belongs to Russia
