REPUBLICAN CHICKS ARE HOT, DEMOCRAT CHICKS ARE NOT !

[BattleofHodow]

"Democratic male politicians were perceived as more masculine looking than their Republican colleagues."

Is that why you are so angry?

The Far Right are usually more muscular, tough & masculine.

Like in Europe with Far Right Hooligans, especially in Eastern Europe.

 

[Nomad]

No it's you.

I spoke to her. I wouldn't let that fucking nasty bitch talk to me. She knew the consequences of doing so.

I found this old pic of your mom and dad shortly after they first met.

I think this was when she told him he had gotten her pregnant with you.

 

[Dachshund]

The Far Right are usually more muscular, tough & masculine.

Like in Europe with Far Right Hooligans, especially in Eastern Europe.



Roman,



You are referring to male thugs. Male thugs are not necessarily politicos. ( For example,take the gang of "bovver boys" in the cult Sci-Fi film "A Clockwork Orange) True, they often seem tend often seem to identify with with extreme right political causes, but many of them are just morons like English soccer hooligans were in the bad old days. Many of them have no genuine political convictions, they are are simply antisocial personalities who are predisposed to violence. The bellicose rhetoric of politicians representing the far right in Eastern Europe, for example, gives many young thugs the excuse they need to organise into violent gangs and attack groups of leftists.





Remember , also, that the overwhelming majority of the violent crime and property crime that was committed during the months of race rioting in the US earlier this year in Democrat cities like Portland, Minneapolis, New York City, Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles, Memphis and Atlanta amongst others, was chiefly caused by extreme leftist organisations This rioting ultimately resulted in: 25 homicides ( all gunshot); 400 police officers injured by rioters ( and two officers killed); a large number of demonstrators and civilians; injured (many seriously; approximately 14,000 arrests for a range of offences including assault, grievous bodily harm, looting, arson, destruction of state and private property, etc.






As mentioned, these riots in the United states were orchestrated by "Black Lives Matter" who are a revolutionary, Marxist/ ( and Black Supremacist) political organisation, and "ANTIFA" who are a socialist paramilitary division (affiliated with the current Democratic Party) Both groups were well funded. Billionaire investor, "philanthropist" George Soros is a well -known supporter of progressive and liberal political causes. In the first three months of 2020, he pumped 28.3 million dollars into the Democrats election campaign. In January and February he donated millions to the main super PAC planning to help then presumptive Presidential nominee Joe Biden and Democratic Senate candidates. He also donated $2 million to "Supermajority" , a PAC, co-founded by former Planned Parenthood leader Cecile Richards and "Black Lives Matter" activist Alizia Garza (NB: a PAC or "Political Action Committee" is simply a group that is set up to raise money to elect and defeat candidates contesting an election for political office). Aliiza Garza and the other two co-founder of "Black Lives Matter" are radical Marxist revolutionaries, whose goal is to destroy America as leader of the free Western world (and raze Western civilisation in its entirety to the ground).





So George Soros, has given money to "Black Lives Matter" and probably "ANTIFA". At least, I would personally bet money that he has; through this is an controversial matter and the American left shriek in outraged indignation that there is no evidence that Soros has funded "ANITIFA". Well, it seems to there are 1000's of ways to "skin a cat" when it comes to getting away with illegally moving large sums of money from a source X to a recipient Y in 2020. If there is no evidence that George Soros has donated money to "ANTIFA", that does not necessarily mean he has not done so. "ANTIFA" are precisely the kind of organisation Soros has demonstrated a (generous) affinity for in the past. And, of course, as I just mentioned (above) he donated $2 million to the "Supermajority" PAC in 2020 which was co-founded by "BLM" 's Alizia Garza.





Finally, here an interesting video-clip of well known US Republican, Newt Gingrich, being unceremoniously shut-down by a mainstream news media station for saying that George Soros is a crook (it's funny )

 

[Dachshund]

TL; DR

"A paragraph is a collection of related sentences dealing with a single topic. Learning to write good paragraphs will help you as a writer stay on track during your drafting and revision stages. Good paragraphing also greatly assists your readers in following a piece of writing. You can have fantastic ideas, but if those ideas aren't presented in an organized fashion, you will lose your readers (and fail to achieve your goals in writing)."

https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/paragraphs_and_paragraphing/index.html

You are right. Thank you for reminding me to watch my "grammar and syntax". I mainly use this forum as a kind of cyber - "writing pad" to practice my written English skills. "POLITICS" is very broad rubric, so I can fit just about any subject matter to interests me under it. I do not expect many people at all will read what I write. But sometimes people do and sometimes they have useful feedback (like yourself) Also there is minimal censorship on this forum which I think is wonderful. (Thank you whoever on JPP Staff is responsisible for this policy. It amazes me to think that there are a lot of passages in Shakespeare that are extremely salacious, extremely rude and violently insulting, and if these lines were rewritten in a post on most internet chat forum (without acknowledging that they were quotations from Shakespeare), then the poster would be banned permanently (!) (PC has no sense of humour - that's what I hate the most about it).

 

[cancel2 2022]

You are right. Thank you for reminding me to watch my "grammar and syntax". I mainly use this forum as a kind of cyber - "writing pad" to practice my written English skills. "POLITICS" is very broad rubric, so I can fit just about any subject matter to interests me under it. I do not expect many people at all will read what I write. But sometimes people do and sometimes they have useful feedback (like yourself) Also there is minimal censorship on this forum which I think is wonderful. (Thank you whoever on JPP Staff is responsisible for this policy. It amazes me to think that there are a lot of passages in Shakespeare that are extremely salacious, extremely rude and violently insulting, and if these lines were rewritten in a post on most internet chat forum (without acknowledging that they were quotations from Shakespeare), then the poster would be banned permanently (!) (PC has no sense of humour - that's what I hate the most about it).

You can thank the site owner Damocles for the relaxed rules.

 

[Bulletbob]

Don't take my word for it, it backed by mainstream scientific research.




A research team at UCLA headed up by psychology and communications Professor, Dr Kerri Johnson, has come up with a remarkable insight into female beauty and political orientation that they call the "Bachmann Effect."



Dr Johnson and her team scanned photographs of the faces of Republican and Democrat female politicians into a computer program called "FaceGen" which matched each politician's face to a set of stereotypically feminine facial features. It seems to me that the most "stereotypically feminine" facial features are the type of facial features found on the world's most beautiful women. And there is very little disagreement among straight men (and women for that matter) about whether or not a particular woman is rightly called a great beauty. Very few normal, heterosexual men would not have said that women like: Bridgette Bardot; Raquel Welsh; Angelina Jolie; Princess Diana; Sophia Loren Brit Ekland; Audrey Hepburn and Marilyn Monroe were extremely beautiful women (or, in PC lingo, that they were stereotypically feminine to a high degree This strongly suggests that feminie beauty is a REAL objective quality that can be investigated using an empirical scientific methodology, which is precisely what Professor Johnson and her research team at UCLA did.




The research found that the female Republican politicians scored, on average, far higher ratings in terms stereotypically feminine facial features than the female Democrat politicians, and that the difference was not caused by chance. To put it bluntly they were saying that Republican chicks, are on average, more likely to be "HOTTIES", while Democrat Chicks are considerably more likely to be "NOTTIES".The research team at UCLA, as I mentioned above called this the "Bachmann Effect" after Michele Bachmann who was a firey, hard-right Republican Congresswoman was, undeniably, a beautiful woman. In the video-clip below she is middle-aged (52 -years -old) through clearly still a very attractive lady...

(BTW, note how what Bahmann says in the video (above) - shot in 2008 - was eerily prophetic. Obama, as she says was an EXTREME leftist who held deeply anti - American views. He was the proverbial "wolf in sheep's clothing". Obama ultimately demonstrated his contempt for America and the Constitution by orchestrating "OBAMAGATE" - the greatest crime in the history of American politics. Bachmann was right, unfortunately no one took her warnings seriously).





At the other end of the spectrum we have leftist horrors like Democrat Congresswoman Rosa Delaurio, below...


I just discovered that I am only allowed to include one video per post, so please google an image, of Delaurio, or a You Tube video to see what I mean.



Then, for example, the corrupt, loud-mouthed, hard - left Democrat, Maxine Waters



(Likewise google up an image, or even better a You Tube Video, the experience the terror for yourself)



And I have to include Rosie O'Donnell who is the ugly, "woke" Democrat woman par excellence (She actually frightens me like a big butt-ugly spider or snake would. I think if ever I had the misfortune to see her nude the shock would cause a fatal cardiac arrest).



(Once again, just tap up an image of her on Google, or a video on You Tube, and you can confirm what I say for yourself)



Here's one final example, Democrat politician and pulp pornography fiction author, the delightful Stacey Abrams...




(Call up a You Tube video, to check her out)



Interestingly, the Democrat hard-liners above are not just physically ugly, they also (interestingly) all have ugly MINDS. They are all "bitter and twisted", all full of anger, "ressentiment" and raw hatred. They do not speak, they SNARL and SPIT like rabid dogs. They are all seeking bloody revenge for some kind of great injustice: racism, discrimination against the LGBTQI "community", reparations for the descendants of 17th and 18th century American Negro slaves, the implementation quotas in the workplace for women and minority groups in order to achieve equity (that is, equality of outcome). Nothing hopeful or positive ever comes out of their mouths, just pure (moral) negativity - pure "badness."






So, as you see, if you have taken a moment to call up an image or video-clip of the individuals above, the further left a female politician is on the political spectrum, the butt-uglier she is. While the converse applies for Republican female politicos like Kayleigh McEnany who is a conservative and a staunch advocate of Trumpism. Note how she is - , consistent with the "Bachmann Effect", - a very beautiful ( and an extremely polite and graceful) woman.






Dachshund

we do have better women and so many democrat women have cocks these days it kinda explains why democrats like them so much

 

[cloud9]

need some example photos. how about a composite photo?