Republican Science (aka, Creationism) on Display: A tour of the "Creation Museum"
The $27 million Creation Museum in Ohio is a fabulous testament to Republican science.
Here, you can gaze in wonder at displays of Adam and Eve's children, happily frolicking with friendly dinosaurs. You can learn how the earth was created in six days, a mere six thousand years ago. Enrich your mind, by learning how coal is formed in a few weeks, not over the course of millions of years.
I don't know about you - but, I don't mind being the laughing stock of the planet; a scientific backwater of the western world. All I can do, is praise Jesus for giving us this wonderful educational treasure:
.
The $27 million Creation Museum in Ohio is a fabulous testament to Republican science.
Here, you can gaze in wonder at displays of Adam and Eve's children, happily frolicking with friendly dinosaurs. You can learn how the earth was created in six days, a mere six thousand years ago. Enrich your mind, by learning how coal is formed in a few weeks, not over the course of millions of years.
I don't know about you - but, I don't mind being the laughing stock of the planet; a scientific backwater of the western world. All I can do, is praise Jesus for giving us this wonderful educational treasure:
Outside the museum scientists may assert that the universe is billions of years old, that fossils are the remains of animals living hundreds of millions of years ago, and that life’s diversity is the result of evolution by natural selection. But inside the museum the Earth is barely 6,000 years old, dinosaurs were created on the sixth day, and Jesus is the savior who will one day repair the trauma of man’s fall.
http://travel.nytimes.com/2007/05/24/arts/24crea.html
.
There were posters explaining just how coal could be formed in a few weeks as opposed to over millions of years, and how rapidly the biblical flood would cover the earth, drowning all but a handful of living creatures. The flood plays a big part in the museum's attempt to explain away what we see as millions of years of natural processes. There was also an explanation as to why, with only one progenitor family, it wasn't considered incest for Adam and Eve's children to marry each other. Apparently there was less sin back then, and therefore fewer mutations in their DNA. Evidently sin, and not two copies of the same recessive trait, gives rise to congenital birth defects.
http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/ars-takes-a-field-trip-the-creation-museum.ars