I think if there was evidence that Trump was a "client" that Garland would have absolutely used it to prosecute him, and that deep staters in the FBI would have ensured that it would reach his desk, even if it was sketchy.
Republicans Block Vote to Release Epstein Files
- Thread starter 鬼百合
- Start date
鬼百合
Let It Burn!
鬼百合
Let It Burn!
I think they didn't because there are also Democrats on the list.
Not a surprise, obviously they got the call from Maralago
Republicans block vote to release Epstein files
Republican lawmakers have blocked a move that could have forced President Donald Trump's administration to release the files on Jeffrey Epstein's investigation.www.newsweek.com
Republican lawmakers have blocked a move that could have forced President Donald Trump's administration to release the files on the sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's death and investigation.
All but one of the GOP members of the House Rules Committee voted against a Democrat amendment that would have allowed Congress to vote on whether the files should be made public or not.
The amendment, which was first put forward by Californian Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna, was voted down 5 to 7 on Monday evening.
Yeah, I thought he’d prosecute Trump immediately, and that didn’t happen.
鬼百合
Let It Burn!
Why did that woman say she had the client list on her desk then?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Not if they were protecting Slick Willie and other Democrats. You know, the same reason Pedo Don ordered the list burned; to protect high up Republicans.
Do you think there was an actual list or just a little black phone book and videos?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
I think there could easily be a list of visitors. A log or “party invitee” list.
As for videos, no doubt there are “party videos”. They don’t have to show sex, just rich and powerful men laughing and drinking with Jeffrey and Ghislaine’s sex slaves.
I wonder what’s on his computer as well.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
A lot of this would have been late 80s and through the 90s. I’m guessing mostly videotape.
So your defense of trump is predicated on the existence of a "deep state." If there is no "deep state" out to get trump, then you would have to admit he is probably guilty?
The fact is that trump has put a lot of work into having plausible deniability. That does not prove him guilty, but it does make you think why it is so important that he not take responsibility for the children he gave Epstein... And why did he give children to Epstein?
"Defense"? Please.
It is a good thing then that trump was there first, and able to make copies of everything. trump can simply release his copies and prove his story... We can all wait... And wait... And wait...
Do you think it was in the server room at mar-a-lardo where trump had the pool water emptied into? That was an odd thing to do with pool water.