Plenty of people that claim they don't have the money to feed, house, and/or clothe themselves and their kids, as evidenced by their use of social welfare programs, seems to have enough money to buy booze, cigarettes, and lottery tickets.
Republicans will lose on abortion
- Thread starter BRUTALITOPS
- Start date
Plenty of people that claim they don't have the money to feed, house, and/or clothe themselves and their kids, as evidenced by their use of social welfare programs, seems to have enough money to buy booze, cigarettes, and lottery tickets.
Those claiming they're pro choice should run on what they are, pro abortion, and quit lying about what they truly believe.
The DNC wants Bernie supporters but they don't want Bernie himself. They like his ideas but don't want the label of "Socialist" attached to them.
Guess it depends on whether they getting what they want vs. being expected to do what they should.
My country suffers every day someone like you that is pro abortion doesn't perform a retroactive one on himself.
It's evidence by their magical ability to buy beer, cigarettes, and lottery tickets while being unable to provide to themselves needs such as food, clothing, and shelter.
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
The answer is "no," only because society won't let them. We're not quite that evolved yet.
Isn't that the same thing as a lefty claiming to be pro choice when they're really pro abortion?
Wouldn't someone claiming to be pro-CHOICE support things like school choice or the choice to have opted out of SS and invest privately?
Late stage liberalism is working on that.
Last Tuesday, they voted down motions to advance two bills that nearly any American would support. The Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, introduced by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), would outlaw elective abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, a point when many unborn children can likely feel pain. The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, introduced by Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.), would mandate a standard of medical care for infants who are born alive after surviving abortions.
Neither measure is radical — the Born-Alive Act doesn’t even touch the subject of abortion. It merely prevents infanticide, while the Pain-Capable Act only matters in states that don’t already have a 20-week limit.
Leftists are near-unanimous in their support of one of the most extreme abortion industries in the world. This radical abortion agenda has been set by groups like Planned Parenthood, which has increasingly shown its true focus: abortion advocacy, not women’s health. The group is a political juggernaut that spent $40 million in 2016 to elect politicians to protect the abortion industry. Under their influence, even “moderate” DEMOCRATS support the status quo instead of standing up for the 88 percent of Americans who support limits on elective abortion.
The failure of the Born-Alive bill is even more shocking. After states like New York passed bills allowing abortion until the moment of birth, and Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam endorsed infanticide, it became clear that living, breathing children were in grave danger.
Bizarrely, no current federal law ensures that doctors provide abortion survivors medical care. Obviously, Americans support this common-sense measure. In a national poll conducted last year by Heritage Action for America, the organization I help lead, 76 percent of respondents supported requiring doctors to provide medical care to these survivors — only 10 percent opposed it. Yet all but three Democrats opposed the bill on Tuesday, distancing themselves further from their constituents.
https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/485775-democrats-extreme-abortion-push
It's why the pro CHOICE claims are meaningless and pro ABORTION is realistic.
what part was false
biological programming, not altruism