Results of Thread Ban Poll

I'd guess I'm an orbiter, I'd have voted for it, though haven't ever used it. That I know of, I've been banned on one thread. No harm done. ;)
I think it was Howie and I'd never comment on most of his posts in the first place.

He's banned so often these days it's not like you'd have a chance anyway.
 
I'd guess I'm an orbiter, I'd have voted for it, though haven't ever used it. That I know of, I've been banned on one thread. No harm done. ;)
I think it was Howie and I'd never comment on most of his posts in the first place.

Now you never have to worry about him; because he's been PERMABANNED. :)
 
the irony of which I am sure is lost on her.

If you mean a simple majority can destroy individual rights, you are closer to fascism, surely? And OH don't the rightist love banning people - the Nazi apple doesn't fall far from the tree, does it? Long live the Inquisition!
 
If you mean a simple majority can destroy individual rights, you are closer to fascism, surely? And OH don't the rightist love banning people - the Nazi apple doesn't fall far from the tree, does it? Long live the Inquisition!

Oh the Nazi reference. If I am not mistaken, someone here once said that the Nazi reference is the last refuge of someone who no longer has an argument to make.

BTW, weren't Nazi's socialists?
 
If you mean a simple majority can destroy individual rights, you are closer to fascism, surely?


When Senate Democrats invoked the “nuclear option”, they immediately did one thing: made this president — and future ones — much more powerful.

Consider: Nominations for executive branch positions — including Cabinet jobs — as well as all non-Supreme Court judicial nominations now need only 51 votes (rather than 60) to end debate...



http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/if-the-senate-democrats-had-gone-nuclear-last-year-who-would-be-secretary-of-state/2013/11/24/4273b4a0-5524-11e3-ba82-16ed03681809_story.html
 
Back
Top