Retirement: A third have less than $1,000 put away

what was it they were trying to do by extending and extending non compliance of the rules by the banks?

what were they accomplishing for the country by doing that?


why do every one of you REFUSE to answer this question if you are such grand experts of the economy like you claim?
 
With all due respect, it's your fault.

Arguing facts with Desh is an undertaking pre-destined for failure. You'd find more mental stimulation in putting your scrotum on an anvil and whacking it repeatedly with a ballpeen hammer.

SF has stated as much himself in the past; one wonders if he is just having a low day and feels compelled to debate a lunatic for sport. ;)
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagging_indicator#Lagging_indicators


Lagging indicators[edit]

Lagging indicators are indicators that usually change after the economy as a whole does. Typically the lag is a few quarters of a year. The unemployment rate is a lagging indicator: employment tends to increase two or three quarters after an upturn in the general economy[citation needed]. In finance, Bollinger bands are one of various lagging indicators in frequent use. In a performance measuring system, profit earned by a business is a lagging indicator as it reflects a historical performance; similarly, improved customer satisfaction is the result of initiatives taken in the past.[citation needed]

The Index of Lagging Indicators is published monthly by The Conference Board, a non-governmental organization, which determines the value of the index from seven components.

The Index tends to follow changes in the overall economy.

The components on the Conference Board's index are:
The average duration of unemployment (inverted)
The value of outstanding commercial and industrial loans
The change in the Consumer Price Index for services
The change in labour cost per unit of output
The ratio of manufacturing and trade inventories to sales
The ratio of consumer credit outstanding to personal income
The average prime rate charged by banks





There I was wrong about it according to this wiki source.



It seems it lags MORE since the last few decades.

do you accept that fact?
 
How does this idea you fought so hard to educate me properly on reflect your accusations about Obamas recovery efforts?
 
I admit I got confused with alternate theories.

I am not an economist



neither are you guys though.



I thank you for correcting me
 
Now how many times do I have to admit I was wrong about thingys claim before you will answer any questions of mine?
 
Now you kind educators please further inform me why the broker rules in GLBact were held back for 8 years by the Bush SEC?


please tell the the REAL reason they were held back if you feel my theories are wrong?


you have seen I will accept a good answer huh?

give me one if you don't want to hear my theory anymore
 
I ate crow guys



Now reward me for it.



see how that works.


give me the reason you claim they worked for nearly a decade to keep the broker rules in Gramm Leach Bliely act from being set on the banks?
 
Ok ok


Ill eat some more crow it that is what it takes.

Super was right and I got fooled by some alternate theories and though that jobs wasn't always lagging indicator.


I now accept ( do to reseaching the facts) that jobs are nearly always a lagging indicator.

I was wrong and super was right
 
Ok ok


Ill eat some more crow it that is what it takes.

Thingy had it right and I got fooled by some alternate theories and though that jobs wasn't always lagging indicator.


I now accept ( due to researching the facts) that jobs are nearly always a lagging indicator.

I was wrong and thingy was right
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagging_indicator#Lagging_indicators


Lagging indicators[edit]

Lagging indicators are indicators that usually change after the economy as a whole does. Typically the lag is a few quarters of a year. The unemployment rate is a lagging indicator: employment tends to increase two or three quarters after an upturn in the general economy[citation needed]. In finance, Bollinger bands are one of various lagging indicators in frequent use. In a performance measuring system, profit earned by a business is a lagging indicator as it reflects a historical performance; similarly, improved customer satisfaction is the result of initiatives taken in the past.[citation needed]

The Index of Lagging Indicators is published monthly by The Conference Board, a non-governmental organization, which determines the value of the index from seven components.

The Index tends to follow changes in the overall economy.

The components on the Conference Board's index are:
The average duration of unemployment (inverted)
The value of outstanding commercial and industrial loans
The change in the Consumer Price Index for services
The change in labour cost per unit of output
The ratio of manufacturing and trade inventories to sales
The ratio of consumer credit outstanding to personal income
The average prime rate charged by banks





There I was wrong about it according to this wiki source.



It seems it lags MORE since the last few decades.

do you accept that fact?

Dear fucking retard... why do you ask if we accept that? We have been explaining that very thing to you over and over and over again. You fucking idiot.
 
so you admit the increase in job recovery time in the case of recessions is NOT Obama fault?


can you get me a post where you admit that ?
 
Oh and BTW since you have proven your economic expertice in this debate please clarify for me why the Bush SEC fought so hard to keep the broker rules in Gramm leach bliely act from being in place.

why did they see the need ?
 
what was it they were protecting?

why did they feel the banks needed 8 years to comply with those rules?
 
so you admit the increase in job recovery time in the case of recessions is NOT Obama fault?


can you get me a post where you admit that ?

No you fucking retard. I stated that we have been trying to explain to you that an INCREASE in lag time does not mean there was no lag time. Which YOU kept saying. It is the responsibility of Congress and the President to promote policies that will help recovery. It CAN be their fault if they get in the way with bad policies, just as it can be their success if they implement good policies. They can also be successful by simply getting out of the way of recoveries.

Simply showing that lag times have increased does not eliminate their responsibility.
 
what was it they were protecting?

why did they feel the banks needed 8 years to comply with those rules?

They weren't protecting anything you fucking retard. You keep saying that, but you REFUSE to address which of the rules that have since been implemented would have stopped the downturn. The only thing that would have is to have not repealed Glass Steagall in the first place. The merger of retail and investment bank was the mistake.

A few rules on who has to register as a broker dealer was not the problem.
 
Back
Top