Rich people are greedy for giving away to charity!

Yes, they have brown skin. But that does not change the fact that the color of their skin is NOT why we attacked. It has nothing to do with that decision. If they were so eager to attack people because of brown skin, why not just attack Mexico. We could have attacked brown people and stopped illegal immigration at the same time. /sarcasm off

We DO have real immigration policies that allow people to come here legally Desh. But please, continue your racist behavior of focusing on their skin color.
If we were just going to attack "brown" people, considering "white" is far the minority across the planet, we'd be attacking about 80% of the planet.

Since "white" is such a minority, the likelihood that we'd be attacking "brown" any time we were in a fight is very high. It is unrealistic to place it off on that. And as I stated before, one of the "targets" currently in our sites is certainly as "white" as we are. Persians are not "brown".
 
Heres the FACTS.

Charity will never fix all that needs to be fixed to spurn the poor forward to make them add to our economy.
Helping the poor get to a point where they are adding to the economy instead of creating a drag on our system is GOOD economic policy as well as the decent thing to do.

Increasing the money we spend on education in this country is going to make a huge differance.When we make schools the hubs of their communitues by showing that at school is where people are going to connect their greater society and feel a sense that their country cares about them and wants to help them be invested in their countries future. This is how our kids will start taking a real interest in education. Schools as they exsist today are just one big place where they are treated like criminals. They are so big all the kids feel no connection to anyone on staff because no one has the time to get to know them personnally and understand their current needs. Prison is not condusive to learning and high schools today are very like them.

Interesting to see a New York City person's perspective on schools. Considering that Liberal NYC has pretty much done all you've asked and blown insane amounts of money on it's schools with terrible results:

"the city was spending some $13,600 per student, about $100 above the state average, which was already the highest in the nation, and more than $5,000 above the national average. In fact, between 1997 and 2004 alone, the city schools’ annual budget had increased more than $6 billion. "
http://www.hoover.org/publications/ednext/3219406.html

Clearly the answer is not more money, as Darla proves with being from New York and pronouncing it terrible, despite the fact that it takes in far more money than anywhere else in the country per capita.
No the answer is school choice, like vouchers.

Here is my own explanation and reasoning for why we do need vouchers:

The system works by granting a cheque to the parent of each child for say $4000 (remember it cost the government anywhere between $8000-$10000 dollars per child in the public education system). The parent then uses the cheque to choose or help choose the private school that they wish to send their child to.
Who benefits from this? Well, the child obviously first and foremost as the average child in a private school gets better grades and receives a higher income in later life. The parent benefits as they have choice and are not stuck with the same state controlled school, they also interact more directly with the school and teachers, rather than a huge bureaucracy. The teacher benefits because they have more freedom over what they teach and do not have the same frustrations that sap a public education system teacher's zest for teaching. Of course, all of us benefit too, because now it cost the government $4000 to educate their child rather than the ridiculous 8000-$10000 now needed.
Education Department figures show that the average private elementary school tuition in America is less than $2,500. The average tuition for all private schools, elementary and secondary, is $3,116, or less than half of the cost per pupil in the average public school, $6,857.
http://www.cato.org/pubs/briefs/bp-025.html

There is one loser of course and that is the teachers union, they stand to lose a lot of control, and obviously the Democrats need those union donations too.

This voucher system has across the board support: Lieberman is in favor of it, most blacks polled are in favor of it, most Republicans are in favor of it.

Still, how can we argue against choice? We have choice in the houses we buy, what we want for dinner, what website we want to visit, can we not have choice in something so important as our child's education?

The final nail in the coffin for the Democrats on education is this: Where do the Kennedy kids go for their education system? How about Chelsea Clinton and most Dem lawmakers children? They all go to private schools while their parents keep pushing and defending the public schools to the rest of us. They are hypocritical and prove it by the choices for their own children.

It is time for choice in education, now. Push your rep for this.
Here is the best link for describing vouchers:
http://www.cato.org/research/education/vouchers.html
 
It is your money give it away if you want to Chap.
Why should I have to pick up more slack just because you want to give money away ?
It is your decision and personal responsibility ;)






jk, mostly.
 
Interesting to see a New York City person's perspective on schools. Considering that Liberal NYC has pretty much done all you've asked and blown insane amounts of money on it's schools with terrible results:

"the city was spending some $13,600 per student, about $100 above the state average, which was already the highest in the nation, and more than $5,000 above the national average. In fact, between 1997 and 2004 alone, the city schools’ annual budget had increased more than $6 billion. "
http://www.hoover.org/publications/ednext/3219406.html

Clearly the answer is not more money, as Darla proves with being from New York and pronouncing it terrible, despite the fact that it takes in far more money than anywhere else in the country per capita.
No the answer is school choice, like vouchers.

Here is my own explanation and reasoning for why we do need vouchers:

The system works by granting a cheque to the parent of each child for say $4000 (remember it cost the government anywhere between $8000-$10000 dollars per child in the public education system). The parent then uses the cheque to choose or help choose the private school that they wish to send their child to.
Who benefits from this? Well, the child obviously first and foremost as the average child in a private school gets better grades and receives a higher income in later life. The parent benefits as they have choice and are not stuck with the same state controlled school, they also interact more directly with the school and teachers, rather than a huge bureaucracy. The teacher benefits because they have more freedom over what they teach and do not have the same frustrations that sap a public education system teacher's zest for teaching. Of course, all of us benefit too, because now it cost the government $4000 to educate their child rather than the ridiculous 8000-$10000 now needed.
Education Department figures show that the average private elementary school tuition in America is less than $2,500. The average tuition for all private schools, elementary and secondary, is $3,116, or less than half of the cost per pupil in the average public school, $6,857.
http://www.cato.org/pubs/briefs/bp-025.html

There is one loser of course and that is the teachers union, they stand to lose a lot of control, and obviously the Democrats need those union donations too.

This voucher system has across the board support: Lieberman is in favor of it, most blacks polled are in favor of it, most Republicans are in favor of it.

Still, how can we argue against choice? We have choice in the houses we buy, what we want for dinner, what website we want to visit, can we not have choice in something so important as our child's education?

The final nail in the coffin for the Democrats on education is this: Where do the Kennedy kids go for their education system? How about Chelsea Clinton and most Dem lawmakers children? They all go to private schools while their parents keep pushing and defending the public schools to the rest of us. They are hypocritical and prove it by the choices for their own children.

It is time for choice in education, now. Push your rep for this.
Here is the best link for describing vouchers:
http://www.cato.org/research/education/vouchers.html

Dano, I think you got them confused. Desh wrote that piece and she lives in Las Vegas. Not Darla, who is in NYC.
 
It is your money give it away if you want to Chap.
Why should I have to pick up more slack just because you want to give money away ?
It is your decision and personal responsibility ;)

well allot of charities count on donations. if they change the tax law they its a fact that the donations will go down in unicin with the change. that doesn't bode well for those non profits.
 
If we were just going to attack "brown" people, considering "white" is far the minority across the planet, we'd be attacking about 80% of the planet.

Since "white" is such a minority, the likelihood that we'd be attacking "brown" any time we were in a fight is very high. It is unrealistic to place it off on that. And as I stated before, one of the "targets" currently in our sites is certainly as "white" as we are. Persians are not "brown".

I agree. It is simply yet another attempt (this time by Desh) to paint all conservatives as racists.
 
Back
Top