PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I guess I just avoided reading the posts of idiots who didn't know how to talk......
Right to bear arms!
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
I guess I just avoided reading the posts of idiots who didn't know how to talk......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
yes.......
Of course you have had to qualify your first statements on the issue. The only dumbfucks are morons like yourself. Grow-up gulper.
Qualify? lol
No, moron. I've had to EXPLAIN the obvious to you simpletons time and again.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
...
You said there were NO laws requiring carrying an ID. You admitted that when driving, by law, you have to have an ID called a driver's license. Do you even know what NO means?
You couldn't kick your own ass figuratively or literally.
Serious question. Are you another one of the dumb, low IQ blacks?
^Lying asshole that, when proven wrong, doesn't have the guts to admit it.
How do you avoid your own posts, dullard?
I also posted a link for him to show that in 25 states you are required to have an ID. That if you are acting in a manner that is suspicious in these 25 states and are asked to produce an ID you can be charged. Then he changed his position to "if I'm not doing ANYTHING suspicious" blah blah blah. The guy is a flamethrower, nothing of substance.
Last edited:
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
????.....why would I read my own posts?......I already know what they say........
Probable cause is a whole different matter, idiot.
I would LOVE to see the verdict of a case where someone was charged for not having an ID when there is no probable cause. Can you say "lawsuit"?
lol
Then you realize what a fucking moron you are? Nope. No chance of that.
The best a cunt like you can do is change the content of another's post. Sad desperation when you can't refute the original content, dullard.
Yes, gulper, we already no your back peddled responses AFTER being shown your big mouthed ignorance.
Woman saves lives with her concealed gun, may end up being charged for violating "gun free zone policy".
http://thebostontribune.com/woman-w...ives-after-stopping-department-store-shooter/
http://thebostontribune.com/woman-w...ives-after-stopping-department-store-shooter/
From your source, douchebag.
"At any time, police may approach a person and ask questions. The person approached is not required to identify himself or answer any other questions, and may leave at any time"
Better reread your own citation, asswipe. From your source, douchebag.
"At any time, police may approach a person and ask questions. The person approached is not required to identify himself or answer any other questions, and may leave at any time"
"Five states’ laws (Arizona, Indiana, Louisiana, Nevada, and Ohio) explicitly impose an obligation to provide identifying information.
Fourteen states grant police authority to ask questions, with varying wording, but do not explicitly impose an obligation to respond:
In Montana, police “may request” identifying information;
In 12 states (Alabama, Delaware, Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Utah, Wisconsin), police “may demand” identifying information;
In Colorado, police “may require” identifying information of a person.
Identifying information varies, but typically includes
Name, address, and an explanation of the person’s actions;
In some cases it also includes the person’s intended destination, the person’s date of birth (Indiana and Ohio), or written identification if available (Colorado).
Arizona’s law, apparently written specifically to codify the holding in Hiibel, requires a person’s “true full name”.
Nevada’s law, which requires a person to “identify himself or herself”, apparently requires only that the person state his or her name.
In five states (Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island), failure to identify oneself is one factor to be considered in a decision to arrest. In all but Rhode Island, the consideration arises in the context of loitering or prowling.
Seven states (Arizona, Florida, Indiana, Louisiana, New Mexico, Ohio, and Vermont) explicitly impose a criminal penalty for noncompliance with the obligation to identify oneself.
Virginia makes it a nonjailable misdemeanor to refuse to identify oneself to a conservator of the peace when one is at the scene of a breach of the peace witnessed by that conservator."
Notice, that not once is "identifying oneself" indicate having an ID.
"Despite the questionable legal status of Arizona's immigration laws, there is no place in the nation where simply being in public without ID is illegal.
However, there are several states in which it is an arrestable offense if you refuse to identify yourself to police. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that these kinds of laws can be legal, as long as the officers had reasonable suspicion to detain you in the first place.
In states with these laws, like Arizona and Nevada, you may be required to give police your full legal name. But you don't have to answer any other questions, and you shouldn't need any form of identification."
http://blogs.findlaw.com/law_and_life/2014/02/do-you-have-to-carry-id-with-you-at-all-times.html