RED are subsidized by BLUE states , Red states have the highest criminal rate, highest murder rate, worst place raise a family, they are the fattest and dumbest, have the highest divorce rate, highest welfare, highest food subsidy , highest hate crimes and hate crime killings, highest number of people on unemployment , worst places for income. and in all terms about the economy electing a right wing president is a total disaster , they are terrible for the economy. You have to be totally anti American to support the hate party. They exist for one reason to transfer every dime of new wealth in this country to the top, so how stupid does it make a right winger if they aren't a 1%er.
Right wing states are hell holes.
- Thread starter jbander
- Start date
SmarterthanYou
rebel
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
name a red state where people shit on the streets like they do in San Francisco.....
SmarterthanYou
rebel
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
None of this is true.
Let's start with the idea red states subsidize blue. When you remove all federal funding for things that are immobile like national parks and such, defense which is based on location need, not the state or population, and other activities not directly associated with a state's functions and population this reverses. For example, red states get the overwhelming amount of social-welfare money handed out.
The large populations in many red states dilute this when it is taken against population as a whole.
Divorce rates don't particularly favor one type of state over another and appear to be far more regional than politically based
-1.png?width=940&name=Rates%20of%20Divorce%20(Women)-1.png)
If red states are such great places to live, why are people fleeing them in mass?
So, your rant is either fiction or fantasy, take your choice.
Stringfellow Hawk
Member
actually blue leadership cities have the highest crime rates. Take the metro areas out and we look like angels. As Guns and Roses would say: "welcome to the jungle"
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
The majority of crime ridden cities are red, but there are blue ones that are dangerous too...
https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/blog/top100dangerous-2019
https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/blog/top100dangerous-2019
What a pile of lie filled bullshit. It's the BLUE city urban shitholes within those states that have the highest crime rates. I wish you could be less stupid. Really I do.
Not ONE of those cities listed are red. I am not sure if you are confused or mistaken.
BattleofHodow
New member
The majority of crime ridden cities are red, but there are blue ones that are dangerous too...
https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/blog/top100dangerous-2019
St. Louis is off the charts for homicide.
About as high as the highest homicide nations on the planet
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
I meant blue. I get confused by that. Red is after all the color of Communists, Leftists, and by extension, Democrats...
BattleofHodow
New member
What a pile of lie filled bullshit. It's the BLUE city urban shitholes within those states that have the highest crime rates. I wish you could be less stupid. Really I do.
It's the same across the USA.
It's dangerous where the Nuggas live.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Where is this happening?
I thought so. But remember we are dealing with morons so they are already confused enough.
Hard to invalidate the fact that when comparing federal tax dollars collected to federal money received, Red States get back more money from the Federal Gov’t than do Blue States. No matter how one wants to reframe the statistics, the Blue States pay more and get less in return, and the opposite hold true for Red States
As far as “shitholes,” no matter how one wants to phrase it, in most categories usually judged as negative, the majority of Red States fall at the top of the lists, while again, the opposite holds true for Blue States that have all those supposedly urban “shitholes”
And lastly, America, and its’ history, isn’t defined by its rural landscapes, few if any come here to visit the fields of Indiana, Kansas, nor Mississippi
As far as “shitholes,” no matter how one wants to phrase it, in most categories usually judged as negative, the majority of Red States fall at the top of the lists, while again, the opposite holds true for Blue States that have all those supposedly urban “shitholes”
And lastly, America, and its’ history, isn’t defined by its rural landscapes, few if any come here to visit the fields of Indiana, Kansas, nor Mississippi
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Until, as I pointed out, you remove expenses that aren't based on population or discretionary. States don't get to choose how much military spending goes to their state. Nor can they choose how much spending for federal land and things like national parks go to them. So simply using how much money a state pays in as federal tax versus the total federal spending in return is a meaningless figure.
AProudLefty
Adorable how loser is screeching for attention. :)
All of them.
You sir/madam/alphabet are a troll.