Rioting looting behavior

You grasp at straws.

Our elections are not decided in the Supreme People's Court, nor by floods of money. Yours are.

Yet you sneer at China?

I laugh.
of course your elections don't have to be decided in the courts....they are decided in the Communist Party leaders dining room, over expensive wine and food that, like freedom, the Chinese people will never be permitted to taste....
 
Of course they have free elections in China. They are free to elect anyone on the ballot, and you must be a party member in order to be on the ballot.

In other words, its a free election like Saddam had elections.

Please name any instance where someone not 'on a ballot' in USA was elected to government office.

You cannot?

How intriguing. Yet you pretend it is otherwise to denigrate a great nation you know vitually nothing of.
 
Please name any instance where someone not 'on a ballot' in USA was elected to government office.

You cannot?

How intriguing. Yet you pretend it is otherwise to denigrate a great nation you know vitually nothing of.

The point is that the only people on the ballots in China are communist party members. The party decides who is on the ballot.

To claim that this is the same as a free election is ridiculous, and you know it.
 
Your elections are free? Now you are making mockery!

I have been mocking you from the beginning. But it does not change the fact that our elections are free and China's are simply a pretend election orchestrated by the party leaders.
 
I have been mocking you from the beginning. But it does not change the fact that our elections are free and China's are simply a pretend election orchestrated by the party leaders.

We would rather keep our system, which is working, than having show-piece multi-party democracy like many countries in the world.

For China, cultural and economic independence is much more important and needed than empty ideology.

We see parties bicker over petty differences, point their fingers at each other for faults, and get nothing done. Once another party is in charge, the first thing they do is to suspend and roll back all changes done by the previous regardless of the effect.

In the economic crisis, we see parties blaming each other for policies they set irresponsibly ages past that no one bothered to correct. We see parties hurried to the rescue of enterprises that invest heavily in the political business, leaving common individuals out.

We reject your notions. This is our right.

Will USA stop attempting to export it's failed political system?
 
We would rather keep our system, which is working, than having show-piece multi-party democracy like many countries in the world.

For China, cultural and economic independence is much more important and needed than empty ideology.

We see parties bicker over petty differences, point their fingers at each other for faults, and get nothing done. Once another party is in charge, the first thing they do is to suspend and roll back all changes done by the previous regardless of the effect.

In the economic crisis, we see parties blaming each other for policies they set irresponsibly ages past that no one bothered to correct. We see parties hurried to the rescue of enterprises that invest heavily in the political business, leaving common individuals out.

We reject your notions. This is our right.

Will USA stop attempting to export it's failed political system?

Promoting freedom and the rights of all people is one of our best exports.
 
Best in what sense?

This export in unwanted in many places, it seems. If people want to copy USA cannot they do so?

Why do you feel authorized to dictate to other nations how they should be governed?

Unwanted? By whom?

When a gov't subjugates its people and kills or imprisons those who disagree, they also dislike it when their people want to choose its leaders.
 
Unwanted? By whom?

When a gov't subjugates its people and kills or imprisons those who disagree, they also dislike it when their people want to choose its leaders.

This is called reactionary. This describes USA policy of imposing your vision of governance on those who reject it.

Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan.
 
This is called reactionary. This describes USA policy of imposing your vision of governance on those who reject it.

Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan.

Korea and Vietnam do not fit your description. Both governments requested our help in defending against an invasion by enemies backed by China.

In both those situations the USA backed the defenders and China backed the aggressors. If you are going to make disparaging remarks about the US's supposed policy of imposing our vision on others, you shouldn't use examples which include invasions by China designed to subjugate other nations.
 
Korea and Vietnam do not fit your description. Both governments requested our help in defending against an invasion by enemies backed by China.

In both those situations the USA backed the defenders and China backed the aggressors. If you are going to make disparaging remarks about the US's supposed policy of imposing our vision on others, you shouldn't use examples which include invasions by China designed to subjugate other nations.

Governments? Corrupt reactionary governments universally acknowledged as USA puppets. The people rose and resisted your aggression in both cases.
 
Governments? Corrupt reactionary governments universally acknowledged as USA puppets. The people rose and resisted your aggression in both cases.

What? Are you saying that the people of North Korea rose to protest the US aggression over South Korea?

Are you actually claiming that China was not trying to make both nations communist, whether they wanted it or not?
 
What? Are you saying that the people of North Korea rose to protest the US aggression over South Korea?

Are you actually claiming that China was not trying to make both nations communist, whether they wanted it or not?

I do not say it, history does.

Educate yourself. The USA invaded and occupied south of 38th parallel after expusion of Japanese imperialists.

Self-government of indigenous Koreans was therefore stymied by USA, who as normal were there 'to help'.

This was intolerable. Koreans who attempted to restore the autonomy of Koreans below the 38th parallel were then attacked by USA and so-called UN 'coaltion' (this begins to sound familiar).
 
Please name any instance where someone not 'on a ballot' in USA was elected to government office.

You cannot?

How intriguing. Yet you pretend it is otherwise to denigrate a great nation you know vitually nothing of.

lol, yellow.....novel approach, we have at least TWO choices on our ballots.....you should try it sometime.....
 
Back
Top