No man is perfect.
But, I don't see John Lennon as being overly or overtly "Flawed"!
Perhaps the OP would like to expand on that.
See my above response to Banana Loon.
No man is perfect.
But, I don't see John Lennon as being overly or overtly "Flawed"!
Perhaps the OP would like to expand on that.
No man is perfect.
But, I don't see John Lennon as being overly or overtly "Flawed"!
Perhaps the OP would like to expand on that.
EJ just seems to be a dick
I loved his early music which depended on another mans lyrics
hes done a coulpe of great songs since then but I cant help but feel he is a dick in real life
EJ just seems to be a dick
I loved his early music which depended on another mans lyrics
hes done a coulpe of great songs since then but I cant help but feel he is a dick in real life
Elton John being a concert pianist at the age of 10 certainly did not hurt his musical career.
As he certainly had his share of Top 40 hits, record sales, and memorable hits to last us all a life time, and earned his way into the Rock & Roll Hall of fame.
When Elton John said of John Lennon that he was "Flawed" has to be taken with a little grain of salt.
The world blamed John Lennon and his marriage to Yoko wrongly, in the breakup of the Beatles. And I think Elton John may have wrongly been referring to that by jumping on that easy bandwagon.
Let's not forget that it was George Harrison that said, "I've had it" and walked out- and for good reasons. With Ringo following him out the door!
he just seems so full of himself
fame does that to some people
Just like the portion of the article you posted said.... "Lennon glared back. 'It's only a bloody song,' he said."
I never claimed he was a perfect human being and I'm fairly certain that he had no illusions about himself either. I said right there in the OP that he was a flawed human being, which is what we all are.
You, more than most.
And it's only petty, jealous little nobodies like you and the bitchy, gossipy Britfag who wrote the book you derive your simplistic thoughts and opinions from, who twist and squirm around trying to apply logic to art. Something that does not lend itself logic.
Lennon was a songwriter. He took ideas and crafted songs around those ideas. Imagine was such a song. An idealistically fanciful idea around which he wrote an idealistically fanciful song. Now, small minded little assholes like you and your Britfag hero "author" try to parse every single word, syllable and punctuation mark in an effort to root out examples of hypocrisy that you've already decided exists there.
As for Elton John, why would you quote another ostentatiously wealthy celebrity who is known for his flashy excess, to criticize Lennon for his wealth?
I just don't get the same enjoyment from his music than when he had Bernie Taupin writing his lyrics
it has a completely different feel
and even his music seems more pedestrian
when he was young and concentrated on just his music
his music was better
his music left me
some people don't get MORE creative as they age
some spend out what creative ability they have and bottom out
hes richer than hell
but his talent has faded