G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
Analysts reviewing what the Republican nominee said in what his campaign billed as a major foreign policy address weren’t impressed.
Foreign policy experts weren’t impressed. They say the speech was vague at best, and reflected some confusion of ideas.
“There’s absolutely nothing in this speech. This is a repackaging of language that has been a staple of Romney’s campaign since he threw his hat in the ring,” said James Lindsay of the Council on Foreign Relations.
“If Romney has a foreign policy strategy, he still has not told us what it is. The governor is very fond of saying hope is not a strategy, but that cuts both ways. He didn’t answer two key questions: what he would do differently and why we should expect what he would do to work.”
Foreign policy experts weren’t impressed. They say the speech was vague at best, and reflected some confusion of ideas.
“There’s absolutely nothing in this speech. This is a repackaging of language that has been a staple of Romney’s campaign since he threw his hat in the ring,” said James Lindsay of the Council on Foreign Relations.
“If Romney has a foreign policy strategy, he still has not told us what it is. The governor is very fond of saying hope is not a strategy, but that cuts both ways. He didn’t answer two key questions: what he would do differently and why we should expect what he would do to work.”