Romney on welfare (litterally)

so rune is being a sneaky dick and not talking about mitt, but rather mitt's grandfather when he was a child

what a dumb fucking thread

poor rune...sad sack
 
He didn't say it was Mitt, you assumed that it was.

right...so current events are about mitt's father when he was a child over 60 years ago

:rolleyes:

sometimes i think you're extremely dense tom. he knew exactly what he was doing when he created this troll thread.
 
what does "litterally" mean mr. 99% IQ?

and she does not even mention welfare or romney you dishonest hack.

[h=3]lit·er·al·ly/ˈlitərəlē/
[/h][TABLE="class: ts"]
[TR]
[TD]Adverb:[/TD]
[TD][TABLE="class: ts"]
[TR]
[TD]
  1. In a literal manner or sense; exactly: "the driver took it literally when asked to go straight over the traffic circle".
  2. Used to acknowledge that something is not literally true but is used for emphasis or to express strong feeling.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
 
right...so current events are about mitt's father when he was a child over 60 years ago

:rolleyes:

sometimes i think you're extremely dense tom. he knew exactly what he was doing when he created this troll thread.

Yes and you fell for it hook, line and sinker.
 
Last edited:
Did either George or Mitt ever say they were against welfare? Not to my knowledge. George and Mitt both expanded social services in their state. Say what you want, but both were sensible, compassionate governors of their respective States.
 
Typical idiot. His parents were on welfare. Dolt.

whose parents were on welfare? be specific.

btw...why is it you feel this is a current event? mitt's father was on welfare as a child over 60 years ago, yet, you posted this in current events. why?
 
whose parents were on welfare? be specific.

btw...why is it you feel this is a current event? mitt's father was on welfare as a child over 60 years ago, yet, you posted this in current events. why?

Because Mitt Romney is in the news, well he was until a few weeks ago.
 
Back
Top