Romney turning blue

cawacko

Well-known member
I think this article is weak. Should people only live near people who vote like them? I don't understand this mentality. Is that the only thing we have in common as humans? And if you live in a 'swing state' or one that has voted both blue and red should you move out when your state votes opposite of how you do? And is diversity of thought a negative thing now?


Mitt Romney turns blue

Of course Mitt Romney wants to settle in a blue state.

According to the Boston Globe, Mitt and Ann Romney will likely move into their home in La Jolla, the San Diego suburb that is sometimes called "where the money meets the sea."

But it is also in La Jolla where the local Democratic councilwoman was just re-elected, giving the San Diego City Council a 5-4 Democratic majority.

And it is in La Jolla where the longtime Republican congressman was just beaten by a Democrat.

And it is in La Jolla where, according to the New York Times, there are six gay households within a three-block radius of the Romneys' $12 million home.

This is not to mention that La Jolla is part of the bluest of blue states, California, where Republican registration just fell below 30 percent, and where voters said "yes" to a tax increase on people just like the Romneys.

So what gives? If you are the Romneys, then why not settle in a red state where people love you? What's wrong with Alabama, Mississippi or even Utah? Simply put, when it comes down to it, Mitt and Ann Romney seem to want the same things that so many others seek in California living: a tolerant, open, environmentally beautiful place to live that we're not afraid to pay for. They would rather be close to gourmet pizza than Chick-fil-A.

And, in fact, the Romneys fall right in line with the work that has been done by sociologists such as Richard Florida, who has developed a cottage industry by studying what he calls "the creative class."

He has written extensively that successful, bright creative professionals - perhaps 30 percent of the American workforce - are the ones driving America's new economy. At the top of Florida's list of "creativity rankings" is, of course, San Francisco. That's followed by Austin, Texas, and then San Diego (including La Jolla).

Washington Monthly magazine summed up Florida's work with the headline "Why Cities Without Gays and Rock Bands Are Losing the Economic Development Race."

Contrast that to a place like Imperial County, in the southeast corner of California. It has the state's highest unemployment rate, at 28.1 percent, and yet officials there had the time, money and energy to file a legal brief in favor of Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage. They have their priorities.

Citizens there probably would love to experience the kind of boom that Silicon Valley techies have brought to the Bay Area. But it took a creative, open environment for Silicon Valley to grow - the same kind of open environment - full of eccentricities and inventiveness - that once gave California the image as The Land of Fruits and Nuts.

Much has been written about why Silicon Valley could only have happened in Northern California. Many think you can draw a direct line to the valley from the original, crazed gold miners, through the wild days of the Barbary Coast, to the beatniks of the 1950s, the hippies of the '60s, the San Francisco music scene and gay liberation.

And you can continue to draw that creative line right to Hewlett-Packard, Lucasfilm, Pixar, Facebook and the new Big Three: Google, Apple and Yahoo. These are companies that began with an idea and found respect and cash for them here - unlike a place like Boston, where your grandfather had to be from there to get venture capital.

There is a culture of creativity in California that is in our DNA.

Certainly the Romneys know that at some level, and they're bound to enjoy it as they settle into the home they've named Fin de la Senda.

Incidentally, that roughly translates as "the end of the road."



http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/openforum/article/Mitt-Romney-turns-blue-4051525.php
 
Romney's reasoning is simple. At the State level, he is a liberal, and for good reason: Blue States are typically much better places to live than Red States. Even CA with all of its problems is an infinitely better place to live than Alabama or Mississippi.

At the federal level, I lean right, but I'm a liberal on State issues. I don't think I'd ever want to live in a Red State.
 
Oh come on we can't have some necom bombasity about loney Cali and how shitty its economy.
Wait maybe Romney knows better than superfreak!
 
Romney's reasoning is simple. At the State level, he is a liberal, and for good reason: Blue States are typically much better places to live than Red States. Even CA with all of its problems is an infinitely better place to live than Alabama or Mississippi.

At the federal level, I lean right, but I'm a liberal on State issues. I don't think I'd ever want to live in a Red State.

Define better.
 
Romney's reasoning is simple. At the State level, he is a liberal, and for good reason: Blue States are typically much better places to live than Red States. Even CA with all of its problems is an infinitely better place to live than Alabama or Mississippi.

At the federal level, I lean right, but I'm a liberal on State issues. I don't think I'd ever want to live in a Red State.

How do you definite a blue state like Wisconsin with a Republican Governor and a Republican Legislature? Or a blue (sometimes red) state like Florida with a Republican Governor? Do you move each time the Governor or Legislature changes hands into control you don't like?
 
I'd rather have AIDS than live in Cali.

test___t607.JPG
 
How do you definite a blue state like Wisconsin with a Republican Governor and a Republican Legislature? Or a blue (sometimes red) state like Florida with a Republican Governor? Do you move each time the Governor or Legislature changes hands into control you don't like?

Have any of those Republican governors/legislatures succeeded in transforming their Blue states into Red states?
 
Have any of those Republican governors/legislatures succeeded in transforming their Blue states into Red states?

I'm sure there are. Off the top of my head Indiana is one. North Carolina may be another but not sure. Not trying to be an ass but I have no real desire to look that up.
 
LOL, I live in southern fucking Mississippi. I have it way, way worse than Romney would. La Jolla is a wonderland of diversity compared to this place.
 
I'm sure there are. Off the top of my head Indiana is one. North Carolina may be another but not sure. Not trying to be an ass but I have no real desire to look that up.

Indiana's move to blue in 2008 was a very limited circumstance. North Carolina was still a swing state in 2012, and bears little resemblance to what occurred there. The thing about NC is that there are a great deal of hardcore liberal, a great deal of hardcore conservatives, and very little swing voters in between. That makes it somewhat of an odd swing state, an inelastic one. This is in contrast to New Hampshire, where there are a great deal of people who may go one way or the other in any election.

Here's an article on what happened in Indiana:

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytime...le-as-battleground-indiana-exits-stage-right/

It has nothing to do with a Republican governor turning them red. Indiana has always been a strongly red state, Obama was just able to wildly overachieve there due to a number of particular factors that didn't reoccur in 2012.
 
I'm sure there are. Off the top of my head Indiana is one. North Carolina may be another but not sure. Not trying to be an ass but I have no real desire to look that up.

Neither Indiana nor NC are blue states. Hell, they can barely be considered swing states.
 
Back
Top