Romney's campaign says its not a tax...

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
I dont have the cite, but did anyone else read this...?

Ill look for the link...

What do you think Dixie and Yurt?
 
Like he will if he becomes the president, Romney is following the right-wing crowd, not leading it. Very odd stuff. The normal way for this stuff to work is for the presidential candidate and his campaign to supply the talking points to the pundits, not for the presidential candidate to conform his talking points to what the pundits are saying.
 
Like he will if he becomes the president, Romney is following the right-wing crowd, not leading it. Very odd stuff. The normal way for this stuff to work is for the presidential candidate and his campaign to supply the talking points to the pundits, not for the presidential candidate to conform his talking points to what the pundits are saying.

Says the Obama worshiper who continually watches Dear Leader 'Lead from behind'
 
So, I see where he flipped on this after the fact, but what do you Romney guys think?
 
Well... I can see where he would say argumentatively that, because legitimately, it hasn't been a tax passed by Congress. Therefore, it is illegitimate as a tax, and not appropriate to call it one just yet. The court has ruled it MUST be a tax, but it wasn't passed as a tax by Congress... so what to do now? We can't call it a tax and we can't not call it a tax. Hence, there are two sides to the argument.
 
Well... I can see where he would say argumentatively that, because legitimately, it hasn't been a tax passed by Congress. Therefore, it is illegitimate as a tax, and not appropriate to call it one just yet. The court has ruled it MUST be a tax, but it wasn't passed as a tax by Congress... so what to do now? We can't call it a tax and we can't not call it a tax. Hence, there are two sides to the argument.

1) Do you belive that is what he was doing?

2) So now you have evolved from "the entire thing is a tax" to "There are two sides to the Argument."
 
1) Do you belive that is what he was doing?

2) So now you have evolved from "the entire thing is a tax" to "There are two sides to the Argument."

1) I don't know what he was doing, I didn't hear him.

2) No, I believe the SCOTUS ruled it has to be a tax to be constitutional. And I believe ANY argument has two sides, or it couldn't be an argument.
 
1) Do you belive that is what he was doing?

2) So now you have evolved from "the entire thing is a tax" to "There are two sides to the Argument."


So who is right ?.....Romney, Obama or the Supreme Court ?
 
have you heard of this thing called the 10th amendment? really neat little thing, that dude. check it out sometime if you have the chance!

1) How would the 10th change if it is a tax or not?

2) Have you ever heard of the 9th?
 
Back
Top