I posted a clip from his speech on the floor. Is bac spending any time trashing Hillary for proposing and supporting an unconstitutional bill, one Paul opposed, to ban flag burning?
This idea that he supports a ban on flag burning is an outright lie and nothing more. It shows the lack of credibility and depth of consideration of his critics.
I understand that he doesn't support it even though he opposed it. It is the same thing Raengel did when all the (R)s started saying he was for the draft.
I just don't get it though. seems like he'd have better things to do.
Basically, he is attempting to give a lesson in the rule of law.
Your pretense of being fair and open minded is completely fake.
Although, as far as I recall it is the role of the Supreme Court to determine whether a bill violates the Constitution, not the role of individual congressmembers. Certainly, he can not vote for a bill he believes to be unconstitutional, but beyond that he shouldn't, if he opposes amending the Constitution, give the opponents of free speech a road map as to how to effectively ban flag burning.
Such anger. Such passion. I've never claimed to be anything, other than a liberal poster who has an opinon. I stand by everything I've written about ron paul. Most of it is verifiable, and concrete. The man has extremist positions from my perspetive. And I dare say, with regard to the perspective of 95% of all americans. I mean, supporting the elimination of public edcuation? You really don't think that's extremist?
Regardless, no need to make this personal, attempt to psychoanalyze people, or do armchair psychology.
John Edwards gets slammed all the time. And i can't recall every taking it deeply personally, or going ballistic on other posters. The reaction of you and the other ronbots is quite brownshirted. I can see why Ron Paul has so many supporters on the brown-shirted and neoconfederate rightwing - The White Conservative citizens council, Stormfront, KKK, David Duke, Christian Identity Movement. The thing that, throughout history, what has drawn rightwing authoritarians together, is a cult like worship of a leader. I'm not saying that you guys are a cult, but I've never seen the supporters of another candidate become such cheerleaders, and get so angry and hostile at criticism of their candidate.
Carry on though! Just calm down, and don't take it so personally. Lord knows, I've had to endure slams of John Edwards, Bill Clinton, and Al Gore. Slams of the worst variety.
Take a chill pill, and breathing excercises may help to calm you.
Appalling. Ron Paul advocates the complete dismantling of public education. This is Extremist.
Libertarian Party Platform
"Separation of education and State"
We advocate the complete separation of education and State. Government schools lead to the indoctrination of children and interfere with the free choice of individuals. Government ownership, operation, regulation, and subsidy of schools and colleges should be ended. We call for the repeal of the guarantees of tax-funded, government-provided education, which are found in most state constitutions.
http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Libertarian_Party_Education.htm
Ron Paul sits on the board of the Alliance for Seperation of Education and State, an organization that promotes the complete decoupling of public funding for education at all levels. Link provided earlier.
Although, as far as I recall it is the role of the Supreme Court to determine whether a bill violates the Constitution, not the role of individual congressmembers. Certainly, he can not vote for a bill he believes to be unconstitutional, but beyond that he shouldn't, if he opposes amending the Constitution, give the opponents of free speech a road map as to how to effectively ban flag burning.
Moreover, reading the bill in question it appears that the drafters made attempts to ensure that the bill is in fact constitutional by prohibiting flag burning within the confines of already unprotected speech such as so-called fighting words and conduct likely to incite imminent violence or lawlessness.
Appalling. Ron Paul advocates the complete dismantling of public education. This is Extremist.
Libertarian Party Platform
"Separation of education and State"
We advocate the complete separation of education and State. Government schools lead to the indoctrination of children and interfere with the free choice of individuals. Government ownership, operation, regulation, and subsidy of schools and colleges should be ended. We call for the repeal of the guarantees of tax-funded, government-provided education, which are found in most state constitutions.
http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Libertarian_Party_Education.htm
Ron Paul sits on the board of the Alliance for Seperation of Education and State, an organization that promotes the complete decoupling of public funding for education at all levels. Link provided earlier.
I never realized how much time his opposition dedicated to Dr. Paul. Maybe there's something there after all?
You think they do not know how to propose an amendment?
What I don't get is if Paul is so meaningless why do BAC, Darla et all spend so much time on him. I mean why waste so much energy {daily for gods sake} if you think he's not viable?
Apparently Ron Paul did, otherwise why bother with the dog and pony show?