So did anyone find his signature to compare it to yet?
LOL. Nice try.

You couldn't debunk or dismiss his logic and reason because it was supported with evidence.
You can't even debate him like a man.![]()
Um he believes the stories about Hunter. So I simply told him to do something about it if he feels so strongly about it instead of bitching about it in an anonymous board.
What is wrong with that?
What do you want him to do? Why can't you man up?
When they bring solid evidence, then I'll do something.
Why don't you accept the evidence?
In order to accept it, it'd have to be hard evidence.
What do you call hard evidence?
Let's start with the signature. Is there a signature that we can compare it to the signature on the recipt?
If the signatures match, will you do something? ... and what do you specifically mean by 'something"?
Informing people, for example.
If the signatures match, what will you tell people?
Nothing. As I have stated the signature is a good start in building up evidence. Still waiting for the signature.
A good prosecutor gathers as many evidence as possible.
Since you were lying about the receipt signature, what do you call hard evidence?