"Russia Gate" Is Now "Obama Gate".....will lead to deep state arrests (including Obama)

[ThatOwlWoman]

They were made up though. Plenty of evidence for this. A good article on the subject by someone who's been following the story for quite some time now, Aaron Mate, published this past Tuesday on his substack:

US intel hid high-level doubts about "Russian interference", docs reveal

The NSA and FBI expressed "low confidence" that Russia hacked and leaked DNC emails to help Trump, documents show. US intelligence leaders concealed this dissent and told a different story.

substack.com

Sorry, but "they" were not "made up," any more than viruses are fictional.

 

[Scott]

When it comes to the war in Ukraine, I certainly think that the west, lead by the U.S., has been the primary aggressor for a long time now.

Of course you do.

Do you know -why- I believe this?

 

[Scott]

They were made up though. Plenty of evidence for this. A good article on the subject by someone who's been following the story for quite some time now, Aaron Mate, published this past Tuesday on his substack:

US intel hid high-level doubts about "Russian interference", docs reveal

The NSA and FBI expressed "low confidence" that Russia hacked and leaked DNC emails to help Trump, documents show. US intelligence leaders concealed this dissent and told a different story.

substack.com

Sorry, but "they" were not "made up,"

I provided an article backing up my assertion. I notice you didn't provide one backing up yours.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Do you know -why- I believe this?

Yes. You've posted your anti-American/pro-Russian conspiracy theories dozens of times.

 

[Scott]

When it comes to the war in Ukraine, I certainly think that the west, lead by the U.S., has been the primary aggressor for a long time now.

Of course you do.

Do you know -why- I believe this?

Yes. You've posted your anti-American/pro-Russian conspiracy theories dozens of times.

It saddens me that so many "debates" here are essentially of the "I'm right, you're wrong" variety. I've presented -evidence- for my assertions, but you snipped that right off. You haven't presented any evidence at all for your assertion that I'm wrong.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

It saddens me that so many "debates" here are essentially of the "I'm right, you're wrong" variety. I've presented -evidence- for my assertions, but you snipped that right off. You haven't presented any evidence at all for your assertion that I'm wrong.

What's to debate? You said your piece, I disagreed.

I love it when people are angry for me snipping their precious posts. I Conspiracy Theorists They're sooooo sensitive.

 

[Nordberg]

The Reds investigated Hillary and Obama . They found nothing that was illegal. This is total right-wing bullshit that you would have to be uninformed to accept. We have lots of qualifiers on this board. The reds talked about the sure thing investigations that would put them away forever. Trumpys cannot learn.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

The Reds investigated Hillary and Obama . They found nothing that was illegal. This is total right-wing bullshit that you would have to be uninformed to accept. We have lots of qualifiers on this board. The reds talked about the sure thing investigations that would put them away forever. Trumpys cannot learn.

what sure thing investigations?

what are you talking about, duncecap?

 

[Sammy Jankis]

It saddens me that so many "debates" here are essentially of the "I'm right, you're wrong" variety. I've presented -evidence- for my assertions, but you snipped that right off. You haven't presented any evidence at all for your assertion that I'm wrong.

dutch uncle is a retarded shit-gibbon.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Do you know -why- I believe this?

dutch uncle is a cretinesque imbecile who doesn't care about actual reality, only his delusions.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

I provided an article backing up my assertion. I notice you didn't provide one backing up yours.

Here you go. Enjoy!

 

[Hawkeye10]

dutch uncle is a cretinesque imbecile who doesn't care about actual reality, only his delusions.

Only about the narrative wars.

This is one regressive fuck.

 

[Hawkeye10]

Here you go. Enjoy!

As if you have the first fucking clue what we The Better People enjoy.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

As if you have the first fucking clue what we The Better People enjoy.

Well, I do see that we BETTER PEOPLE all post every day in the Nice Thread, so I'm fairly confident that @DutchUncle enjoys his property and his crafts. @Phantasmal enjoys travel, fun with their grandkids, her beautiful pool, and gardening. Guno enjoys his large family, going to shul, and sharing his knowledge. Jade enjoys his family and get-togethers with his neighbors, as well as collecting various things. I enjoy gardening, hiking, my dear Mr. Owl, cooking, learning new languages. NHB enjoys her family, her career, and travel. @Cypress recently retired and is loving his discussion groups, the nearby beach, learning history, philosophical discussions. LurchAddams enjoys discussions, his beautiful surroundings in the PNW, his career. @Diesel finds pleasure in travel, work, family and friends, planning and executing wonderful parties, and looking good. Christiefan loves gardening too! Nifty enjoys his man cave, music, Italian food (which he often makes himself), hanging out with his pooch on the porch, movies, his adult children, and hating on MAGATs.My apologies to anyone I left out.

So you see, weirdo, I do know quite a lot about what the BETTER PEOPLE enjoy. Thankfully none of us much care for you and your Toxic GF's hobbies -- gossip, despair, bitterness, rage, stalking, doxing, and public displays of mutual masturbation.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Only about the narrative wars.

This is one regressive fuck.

zombies like Dutch and into the night are just here to destroy good threads with their dumb bullshit.

 

[GreatAmerican]

.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1948925194795630940

View: https://x.com/janninereid1/status/1948925194795630940

 

[Hawkeye10]

Obama is above the law.

Prove Me Wrong.

 

[Hawkeye10]

zombies like Dutch and into the night are just here to destroy good threads with their dumb bullshit.

Almost Never Right WALT.

 

[Phantasmal]

Sorry, but "they" were not "made up," any more than viruses are fictional.

This was investigated by a bipartisan committee led by Trump’s current Secretary of State. They look at all the evidence and determined Russia interfered. I’m pretty sure if there was evidence to the contrary Bill Barr would have been all over it.

This attempt by Gabbard is nothing but an attempt to distract from Epstein and to take the heat off herself for her testimony on Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

 

[Scott]

You're free to believe you don't constantly defend Mother Russia from the big, bad United States.

When it comes to the war in Ukraine, I certainly think that the west, lead by the U.S., has been the primary aggressor for a long time now. I think the 2014 Euromaidan coup was when things kicked off into high gear. But I certainly don't always agree with Russia's politics. Their views on the LGBTQ movement, for instance:

LGBTQ rights in Russia - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Of course you do.

Do you know -why- I believe this?

Yes. You've posted your anti-American/pro-Russian conspiracy theories dozens of times.

It saddens me that so many "debates" here are essentially of the "I'm right, you're wrong" variety. I've presented -evidence- for my assertions, but you snipped that right off. You haven't presented any evidence at all for your assertion that I'm wrong.

What's to debate? You said your piece, I disagreed.

The debate would be in why we disagree. I've taken the time to do nested quotes above all the way to where this really started, back in post #135, with me saying the certain lines. I'll quote what I wrote in that post below to make it easier to debate:
**
When it comes to the war in Ukraine, I certainly think that the west, lead by the U.S., has been the primary aggressor for a long time now. I think the 2014 Euromaidan coup was when things kicked off into high gear. But I certainly don't always agree with Russia's politics. Their views on the LGBTQ movement, for instance:

LGBTQ rights in Russia - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

**

Your response, in post #160, was to resize the first line of that to a larger font and respond -only- to that line with "Ofcourse you do." Ignored was the second line that got into -why- I believe that, never mind the third line wherein I made it clear that you were mistaken that I always defend "Mother Russia from the big, bad United States", as you put it in post #133. I decided to only pursue the matter of -why- I believe that the west, lead by the U.S., has been the primary aggressor in the Ukraine conflict for a long time now, so I simply asked you if you knew why I believe the west was the primary aggressor. Your trite was response was "Yes. You've posted your anti-American/pro-Russian conspiracy theories dozens of times."

Do you see how that's a cop out? It's essentially saying that I believe in something that is wrong. No need to actually provide -evidence- that what I believe is wrong. This is a rather easy way to kill a debate. It reminds me of a line once said from the late David Ray Griffin:
**
A myth is an idea that, while widely believed, is false.
In a deeper sense, in the religious sense, a myth serves as an orienting and mobilizng story for people.
The focus is not on the story's relation to reality but on its function.
A story cannot function, unless it is believed to be true in the community or the nation.
It is not a matter of debate if some people have the bad taste to raise the question of the truth of the sacred story.
The keepers of the faith do not enter into the debate with them.
They ignore them, or denounce them as blasphemers.
**

You have, in essence, denounced me as a blasphemer to the sacred mainstream story that Russia is the bad guy.