RussiaGate is not going away!

Darth Omar said:
You really, really, want it to be true, don't you lol.
Click to expand...

Stop projecting. You really, really want it to NOT be true.

You continue to blame "liberals" for a criminal investigation. It's partisan nonsense. Enough already; just wait it out & see what the results are (and welcome to Dem world on that one).
 
Thing1 said:
Stop projecting. You really, really want it to NOT be true.

You continue to blame "liberals" for a criminal investigation. It's partisan nonsense. Enough already; just wait it out & see what the results are (and welcome to Dem world on that one).
Click to expand...

If it's true I'll deal with it. In the meantime, some evidence would be nice lol.
 
Darth Omar said:
If it's true I'll deal with it. In the meantime, some evidence would be nice lol.
Click to expand...

Well, like I told you, your expectations are off. Investigators don't generally release evidence or findings on an ongoing basis while investigations are still being conducted. You seem new to this whole "investigation" thing, so I'm trying to help here.

And you & yours are the ones who have staked yourself to a definitive conclusion on this. You have guaranteed that there is nothing to this. Without knowing anything.
 
Let's not wallow in Watergate...

48518926.cached.jpg

LMFAO
 
Thing1 said:
Well, like I told you, your expectations are off. Investigators don't generally release evidence or findings on an ongoing basis while investigations are still being conducted. You seem new to this whole "investigation" thing, so I'm trying to help here.

And you & yours are the ones who have staked yourself to a definitive conclusion on this. You have guaranteed that there is nothing to this. Without knowing anything.
Click to expand...

Since you brought up democrats experience with investigations let's put it this way.

If I were a Hillary supporter last year I'd be sweating bullets: sketchy meetings on the tarmac, mishandling classified information, storing classified info on her private server, lying about it, having an aid destroy her cell phones and etc. Keep in mind these were all known facts that no one disputed.

Seriously, I'd be shopping for another candidate because I'd be thinking this woman is going down. I would have bet practically anything on it. Then Comey steps in with his gymnastics and doesn't indict Hillary---even though that's not his job. The whole think reeked of partisan politics interfering with justice.

At any rate, what do they have on Trump that compares to what they had on Hillary? Show me some facts. I don't want to hear about speculation.
 
Darth Omar said:
Since you brought up democrats experience with investigations let's put it this way.

If I were a Hillary supporter last year I'd be sweating bullets: sketchy meetings on the tarmac, mishandling classified information, storing classified info on her private server, lying about it, having an aid destroy her cell phones and etc. Keep in mind these were all known facts that no one disputed.

Seriously, I'd be shopping for another candidate because I'd be thinking this woman is going down. I would have bet practically anything on it. Then Comey steps with his gymnastics and doesn't indict Hillary---even though that's not his job. The whole think reeked of partisan politics interfering with justice.

At any rate, what do they have on Trump that compares to what they had on Hillary? Show me some facts. I don't want to hear about speculation.
Click to expand...

The election is over Darthy

Your boy is on the carpet now...
 
Darth Omar said:
Since you brought up democrats experience with investigations let's put it this way.

If I were a Hillary supporter last year I'd be sweating bullets: sketchy meetings on the tarmac, mishandling classified information, storing classified info on her private server, lying about it, having an aid destroy her cell phones and etc. Keep in mind these were all known facts that no one disputed.

Seriously, I'd be shopping for another candidate because I'd be thinking this woman is going down. I would have bet practically anything on it. Then Comey steps in with his gymnastics and doesn't indict Hillary---even though that's not his job. The whole think reeked of partisan politics interfering with justice.

At any rate, what do they have on Trump that compares to what they had on Hillary? Show me some facts. I don't want to hear about speculation.
Click to expand...

I love stuff like "sketchy meetings on the tarmac" - nothing screams partisan hackery & conspiracy theorist like that one.

And what do we KNOW right now? Investigation over, and no indictments. So, for all of your & Trump's year+ innuendo and "worse than Watergate" talk, it amounted to a big fat nothing.

I can list the same partisan hack stuff as you about Trump - Manafort's past w/ Russia, Russia's known hacking, Trump telling Russia to find the missing emails. You won't think so, because you're immersed in koolaid, but it's the same as what you listed. And it might not amount to a hill of beans - but they're investigating it, and it's not because "lefties" pressured them into it. There was enough there there to warrant an investigation.

And you seem to think the investigation continues just because "lefties" are demanding it. Clearly, it makes you extremely uncomfortable that they're investigating - but you're going to have to deal. They're not going to call it off at this point. Just sit tight & see what they come up with.
 
Thing1 said:
I love stuff like "sketchy meetings on the tarmac" - nothing screams partisan hackery & conspiracy theorist like that one.

And what do we KNOW right now? Investigation over, and no indictments. So, for all of your & Trump's year+ innuendo and "worse than Watergate" talk, it amounted to a big fat nothing.

I can list the same partisan hack stuff as you about Trump - Manafort's past w/ Russia, Russia's known hacking, Trump telling Russia to find the missing emails. You won't think so, because you're immersed in koolaid, but it's the same as what you listed. And it might not amount to a hill of beans - but they're investigating it, and it's not because "lefties" pressured them into it. There was enough there there to warrant an investigation.

And you seem to think the investigation continues just because "lefties" are demanding it. Clearly, it makes you extremely uncomfortable that they're investigating - but you're going to have to deal. They're not going to call it off at this point. Just sit tight & see what they come up with.
Click to expand...

Russiagate is worse than Watergate, for the FBI and NSA that spied on Trump
 
Micawber said:
" He will die in jail’: Intelligence community ready to ‘go nuclear’ on Trump, senior source says"
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/he-...dy-to-go-nuclear-on-trump-senior-source-says/
Click to expand...
^ talk about sketchy...

Micawber said:
The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign, US officials told CNN.

This is partly what FBI Director James Comey was referring to when he made a bombshell announcement Monday before Congress that the FBI is investigating the Trump campaign's ties to Russia, according to one source.
The FBI is now reviewing that information, which includes human intelligence, travel, business and phone records and accounts of in-person meetings, according to those U.S. officials. The information is raising the suspicions of FBI counterintelligence investigators that the coordination may have taken place, though officials cautioned that the information was not conclusive and that the investigation is ongoing.
In his statement on Monday Comey said the FBI began looking into possible coordination between Trump campaign associates and suspected Russian operatives because the bureau had gathered "a credible allegation of wrongdoing or reasonable basis to believe an American may be acting as an agent of a foreign power." CNN
Click to expand...

CNN? lol..and where is the link?
 
Thing1 said:
I love stuff like "sketchy meetings on the tarmac" - nothing screams partisan hackery & conspiracy theorist like that one.

And what do we KNOW right now? Investigation over, and no indictments. So, for all of your & Trump's year+ innuendo and "worse than Watergate" talk, it amounted to a big fat nothing.

I can list the same partisan hack stuff as you about Trump - Manafort's past w/ Russia, Russia's known hacking, Trump telling Russia to find the missing emails. You won't think so, because you're immersed in koolaid, but it's the same as what you listed. And it might not amount to a hill of beans - but they're investigating it, and it's not because "lefties" pressured them into it. There was enough there there to warrant an investigation.

And you seem to think the investigation continues just because "lefties" are demanding it. Clearly, it makes you extremely uncomfortable that they're investigating - but you're going to have to deal. They're not going to call it off at this point. Just sit tight & see what they come up with.
Click to expand...
you didn't find that sketchy? Then why did Lynch recuse herself?

where do you see anything -anything at all- that even remotely looks like collusion?
 
anatta said:
you didn't find that sketchy? Then why did Lynch recuse herself?

where do you see anything -anything at all- that even remotely looks like collusion?
Click to expand...

How "sketchy" can it be w/ such a thorough investigation producing ZERO indictments? That's the point. And you were going nuts about the big "email scandal" the whole time.

It was just as "sketchy" as any of the perceived ties between Trump's campaign & Russia.

It is SO cool to see how you guys react when the shoe is on the other foot.
 
Thing1 said:
I love stuff like "sketchy meetings on the tarmac" - nothing screams partisan hackery & conspiracy theorist like that one.

And what do we KNOW right now? Investigation over, and no indictments. So, for all of your & Trump's year+ innuendo and "worse than Watergate" talk, it amounted to a big fat nothing.

I can list the same partisan hack stuff as you about Trump - Manafort's past w/ Russia, Russia's known hacking, Trump telling Russia to find the missing emails. You won't think so, because you're immersed in koolaid, but it's the same as what you listed. And it might not amount to a hill of beans - but they're investigating it, and it's not because "lefties" pressured them into it. There was enough there there to warrant an investigation.

And you seem to think the investigation continues just because "lefties" are demanding it. Clearly, it makes you extremely uncomfortable that they're investigating - but you're going to have to deal. They're not going to call it off at this point. Just sit tight & see what they come up with.
Click to expand...

Do you think while you type lol?

Like Trump is in cahoots with Putin, and he's actually going to *publicly* call on Putin to release more emails! Give me a break.

Come to think of it, that's pretty good evidence there is no collusion.
 
Darth Omar said:
Do you think while you type lol?

Like Trump is in cahoots with Putin, and he's actually going to *publicly* call on Putin to release more emails! Give me a break.

Come to think of it, that's pretty good evidence there is no collusion.
Click to expand...

Apparently, you do not.

I made it very clear in my post that I don't consider those points to be great "evidence" - but that they are the equivalent of what you listed.

I know you think that your list has more "heft," but it doesn't. It's the same partisan nonsense - and actually, it's proven to be even more ludicrous, because THAT investigation is done, and they found zilch.
 
Thing1 said:
How "sketchy" can it be w/ such a thorough investigation producing ZERO indictments? That's the point. And you were going nuts about the big "email scandal" the whole time.

It was just as "sketchy" as any of the perceived ties between Trump's campaign & Russia.

It is SO cool to see how you guys react when the shoe is on the other foot.
Click to expand...
clinton violated the Espionage Act. There is no doubt she exhibited gross carelessness.
Comey chose not to indict her because of perceived lack of intent

If you bother to read the act it does not require intent -only the act of gross carelessness..

Compare that to Clappers and other's saying there was no evidence of Russian collusion
 
anatta said:
clinton violated the Espionage Act. There is no doubt she exhibited gross carelessness.
Comey chose not to indict her because of perceived lack of intent

If you bother to read the act it does not require intent -only the act of gross carelessness..

Compare that to Clappers and other's saying there was no evidence of Russian collusion
Click to expand...

Do you still believe that Flynn isn't going to prison?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top