Sandwich Guy Found Not Guilty
- Thread starter martin
- Start date
I heard one juror was unsure of the depravity of the crime due to the presence of MAYO on the sandwich. The horror! lol
Is it ok?
No telling, but the one on the balding scabby head fits in here. lol
The MAGAT sobriquet "snowflakes!" has a whole new meaning now, eh?
Really. In the dark and demented world of Delusional Debbie, this means guilty.
Not at all, it was impolite.
QP!
Verified User
100%.
Why wouldn't we when we know he did not commit the felony the Trump Magats tried to charge him with and failed, and he did not even commit the misdemeanor they charged with and the jury rejected.
We know Trump's magat ICE officials are lying in courts constantly when they abuse people and then arrest them and accuse the people wrongly of tings they did not do as a way to try and get convictions when the truth would not do it.
I support this guy exposes how corrupt these agents are.
I dont support silly prosecution especially for political reasons.
When I was a kid we went to Mesa Verde and the day we left we came around a curve and hit a mudslide area on the road. We were towing a heavy utility trailer with all of our camping gear. It sent us into a slide and spin we narrowly (3ft)Another one... for the view:
escaped from going over the side to a 600 foot fall. It was pretty scary.
But Mesa Verde is a very interesting place I have been three times and always learn something. It is a beautiful area. I always recommend people see it.
So you would let sub crime go unpunished? That's baloney.
QP!
Verified User
It literally was not.
The grand jury that would indict a ham sandwich said it was not felony and refused to give them an indictment.
The trial jury being reject that it was a misdemeanor.
Therefore it is NOT a crime to any degree.
What that means is that it is considered "symbolic gesture" which would fall under the extension of Free Speech, as 'Protests' are generally given a little more lattitude in that regard.
Dear Jurors: Why is "assault" a crime? Because it carries the risk of physical injury. Here a sandwich was tossed a few feet onto a uniformed chest.
The defense rests.
There was only one unexploded hero to be found that day.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
was it Mr. Peanut?
QP!
Verified User
ZOMG a sandwich. Won't someone help poor Yakuda cope with what is clearly devastating him...
QP!
Verified User
Ya it should not have taken that long but i guess they wanted to be thorough.They deliberated for 7 hours...
Clear abuses of charging power like this should be rejected by the Grand Jury but i suspect after they said no to the felony they felt they had to give them something to at least try in court with, despite them probably wanting to reject it too.