Saw that coming, Trumpers destroy constitution.

No not weaken. Do away with them. Rights conferred by individual states or cantons.

:happening:

I’ve been for the dissolution of America as we know it for years.
Too many different and conflicting values for one country.

What right have you ever had taken?
 
The Constitutional Right to make personal medical decisions for oneself. AKA the right to privacy from the Government when making decisions about your body with your doctor.

Before you debate and share "opinions" about Roe v. Wade, you should read the opinion.

Oh, I agree! That’s why I mentioned the 4th amendment. 100% agree that a woman from Texas should be able to discuss her situation with a Texas doctor, and that doctor should be able to say “you WANT to have an abortion? Here is the name and address of a clinic in Louisiana where you can get one”. Health of the mother is another issue, and I suspect that if the question is ever turned back over to the individual states, the number of abortions due to rape and incest are gonna sky rocket to the point where even you might get a little nauseous. Just admit that the SCOTUS twisted in agony to come up with a vague and tortured “opinion”.

BTW, in your “opinion”, do I have a 4th amendment right to keep my firearm ownership status concealed from the government?
 
Oh, I agree! That’s why I mentioned the 4th amendment. 100% agree that a woman from Texas should be able to discuss her situation with a Texas doctor, and that doctor should be able to say “you WANT to have an abortion? Here is the name and address of a clinic in Louisiana where you can get one”. Health of the mother is another issue, and I suspect that if the question is ever turned back over to the individual states, the number of abortions due to rape and incest are gonna sky rocket to the point where even you might get a little nauseous. Just admit that the SCOTUS twisted in agony to come up with a vague and tortured “opinion”.

BTW, in your “opinion”, do I have a 4th amendment right to keep my firearm ownership status concealed from the government?

No, they can’t unreasonably search or seize your firearm, but they can require you tell them you have it.
 
In the context of a WELL REGULATED MILITIA.

Also, I believe the exact wording of the 2nd is.... "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms....."

Keeping and owning are not necessarily the same thing.

Wow, split hairs much? But guess what, it means "own".

But hey, why don't you start a riot about the right to split hairs. Sounds like a more worthy cause than all the other sht you riot about.

And when are you going to riot about blacks having equal right of self defense in your leftist mafia hive cities?
 
No not weaken. Do away with them. Rights conferred by individual states or cantons.

:happening:

I’ve been for the dissolution of America as we know it for years.
Too many different and conflicting values for one country.

When they're legitimate conflicting views, that's one thing. But it's really just habitual contrarionism for political expedience to radicalize their respective constituencies.

The problem is that there aren't enough conflicting views imho. It's harder for two grps to be contrarian ass grabbers when there's more kinds of people than two measly political nouns to choose from.
 
Wow, split hairs much? But guess what, it means "own".

But hey, why don't you start a riot about the right to split hairs. Sounds like a more worthy cause than all the other sht you riot about.

And when are you going to riot about blacks having equal right of self defense in your leftist mafia hive cities?

“The people” is not necessarily individual people either, it could mean a militia has a right to keep arms in an armory.
 
The challenge to abortion does not involve a Constitutional right to kill the unborn.

The Second Amendment does involve a specific right...gun ownership.

The Communist governor of California has no case. The Supremacy clause...

Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

That's exactly what it involves, up until the "unborn" attain viability. The challenge seeks to burden that right. The California challenge being proposed on gun laws would burden those rights. No difference.
 
Wow, split hairs much? But guess what, it means "own".

But hey, why don't you start a riot about the right to split hairs. Sounds like a more worthy cause than all the other sht you riot about.

Funny how you barrel strokers will split hairs and nit-pick over every word of the Constitution when it suits your fancy, but when there's a real discrepancy there that doesn't support your interpretation, suddenly it's not good to pay attention to details.

And I don't believe there were any of "us" invading the US Capitol on January 6th.

And when are you going to riot about blacks having equal right of self defense in your leftist mafia hive cities?

Blacks already have an equal right of self defense in every city and every state.

When are you going to riot again about not getting everything your way or about your right to go through life as ignorant, low-educated, redneck assholes?
 
No, they can’t unreasonably search or seize your firearm, but they can require you tell them you have it.

Wrong. Stick to traffic court.

Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Where does it say or even infer, that I am required by law to notify the federal government of anything I own as a private citizen?

https://gunsinthenews.com/is-the-government-maintaining-gun-records-on-you/

If one of my guns was ever stolen and used in a crime and I didn't report it by serial number, and the local yokels showed up (even with a search warrant), I'd be a rich man. Now ask me why, or maybe you can figure it out. Now notice that I said FEDERAL government. Local and state governments are a different story. I've lived in places that required me to register my guns with the local PDs. I did not comply.

But you said nothing about abortion. Was I wrong?
 
“The people” is not necessarily individual people either, it could mean a militia has a right to keep arms in an armory.

HORSE SHIT. ALREADY ESTABLISHED AS AN INTENDED INDIVIDUAL RIGHT, WHEN THE DISTRICT of CLOUMBIA WAS SUCCESSFULLY SUED AT THE SCOTUS.



MAKEUP SOME MORE LIES....
 
Funny how you barrel strokers will split hairs and nit-pick over every word of the Constitution when it suits your fancy, but when there's a real discrepancy there that doesn't support your interpretation, suddenly it's not good to pay attention to details.

And I don't believe there were any of "us" invading the US Capitol on January 6th.



Blacks already have an equal right of self defense in every city and every state.

When are you going to riot again about not getting everything your way or about your right to go through life as ignorant, low-educated, redneck assholes?

Right, cuz the our forefathers who all owned guns and fought the British for our freedom really meant we should rent our guns from a bunch of faggots...... suuuuuuure

Yeah that's not going very far. Fag.
 
Blacks already have an equal right of self defense in every city and every state.
That's not what all the displaced black men from Chicago who swore up and down there was no self defense laws while I sat in jail for six months just waiting to slam dunk self defense all over the mafia prosecutor's face. Not unlike Rittenhouse I might add.
 
When are you going to riot again about not getting everything your way or about your right to go through life as ignorant, low-educated, redneck assholes?

Wutcha talken about Willis? We're waiting for you junky faggots to try sumthin (:

Feel lucky?
 
Oh, I agree! That’s why I mentioned the 4th amendment. 100% agree that a woman from Texas should be able to discuss her situation with a Texas doctor, and that doctor should be able to say “you WANT to have an abortion? Here is the name and address of a clinic in Louisiana where you can get one”. Health of the mother is another issue, and I suspect that if the question is ever turned back over to the individual states, the number of abortions due to rape and incest are gonna sky rocket to the point where even you might get a little nauseous. Just admit that the SCOTUS twisted in agony to come up with a vague and tortured “opinion”.

BTW, in your “opinion”, do I have a 4th amendment right to keep my firearm ownership status concealed from the government?

Lots of poor people cannot afford to go to another state. They lack money and transportation. However, if you provide the money for that, a bounty is on your head. If you give directions to an LA clinic, you have a bounty on your head.
 
Right, cuz the our forefathers who all owned guns and fought the British for our freedom really meant we should rent our guns from a bunch of faggots...... suuuuuuure

Yeah that's not going very far. Fag.

They weren't simple-minded hillbilly trash like you Trumpsucker cultists are.

They were thinking about the future of this country which included establishing a climate in which law and order could be more easily maintained. That's why they put the 'well regulated militia' clause in there, but the dumbasses that came along afterward were too prone to violence and wanted easy access to guns so that, rather than deal with conflicts peacefully, they could just blow somebody's head off and feel like a big, bad-ass about it. Therefore they just ignored that part.

Same kind of tough guy fantasies that low-brow pussies and losers like you engage in today.
 
Wrong. Stick to traffic court.

Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Where does it say or even infer, that I am required by law to notify the federal government of anything I own as a private citizen?

https://gunsinthenews.com/is-the-government-maintaining-gun-records-on-you/

If one of my guns was ever stolen and used in a crime and I didn't report it by serial number, and the local yokels showed up (even with a search warrant), I'd be a rich man. Now ask me why, or maybe you can figure it out. Now notice that I said FEDERAL government. Local and state governments are a different story. I've lived in places that required me to register my guns with the local PDs. I did not comply.

But you said nothing about abortion. Was I wrong?

It is not an enabling Amendment its a restricting one.
 
Back
Top