ExpressLane
Verified User
They would be seriously out of tune wouldn't they.
Scandalous new proof utterly debunks the Russia hoax, let's review the Democrat lies
- Thread starter Thaddeus Martel
- Start date
ExpressLane
Verified User
No one care about who you trust.
ExpressLane
Verified User
Personally I think Durham has the goods on them. I doubt he would have brought a case this controversial if he didn't have strong evidence. What will you do if this turns out to be true?
ExpressLane
Verified User
I doubt Hillary will be charged. Sussman will commit suicided first.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Shouldn't the word suicide be in quotes when the Hildabeast is involved?
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
The Hildabeast has a near continuous track record of being dishonest, unethical, and even criminal in her dealings. Even back when she was hired as part of the Watergate special council investigation this was apparent.
https://www.cato.org/blog/was-hillary-clinton-fired-nixon-impeachment-inquiry
ExpressLane
Verified User
She is a disgusting "human".
Sadly, I suspect that you're correct.
Michael Steele is under arrest? What claims from the media will be retracted? The Mueller report lists multiple contacts between the Trump campaign and Russians. What Mueller couldn't find evidence of was conspiracy to defraud. Mueller states that Trump was willing to accept the help of the Russians but there was no evidence of coordination.
https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download
What facts did you provide? You provided innuendo and conspiracy bullshit. There is no evidence of Trump being spied on. Obviously you didn't read the Durham submission to the court. He does not allege that Trump was spied on. He does not allege that Trump servers were infiltrated. He states that the company that was hired to set up the WH DNS servers had access to those servers. That is not a crime. That is not proof of spying. It isn't proof of anything.2) I have provided facts and evidence. You have provided nothing but "I don't like that."
You claimed the Democrats staged 1/6 but presented no facts or evidence. Your link only reports that the FBI refused to answer questions about whether an investigation was occurring. That is not proof of anything since the FBI is required to answer the same way any time a question like that is asked. So there is no evidence of the FBI being involved. Just speculation based on their following standard procedure. Then you make the idiotic leap from the FBI to Democrats. The FBI is part of the DoJ and the DoJ was under the control of Trump. How does that make FBI involvement a Democratic plot?
I would love to see your math that shows that the final voting results were impossible. But that is just another example of you not providing any facts. Just stupid comments that are not based in reality.
The rest of your claims are so much bullshit unsupported by any facts. You can't provide any actual facts, can you?
It seems you don't have a clue of what Durham is claiming in his filing. Go read it and then we can discuss. But until then you are only proving you are a conspiracy nut.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.35.0_1.pdf
If you wonder how the Hildebeast knew she'd get away with spying on a political rival, consider the stony silence on Durham’s report by the dissembling DEMOCRAT-dominated "approved" media.
Newsbusters reported that bungling Biden’s national security advisor and pernicious purveyor of Russian collusion, Jake "The Snake" Sullivan was on See-BS’s Face the Nation, and CNN’s State of the Union last Sunday, and nobody bothered to ask him about the latest Hildebeast scandal.
In fact, none of the limp-wristed lying-by-omission loyalists bothered to report on the latest revelations.
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kevin-tober/2022/02/14/nets-ignore-explosive-report-showing-clinton-spied-trump
You know what he will do.
Thaddeus Martel
Verified User
1) Wait. You enthusiastically supported Mueller outright torturing people and threatening to destroy the lives of their families if they didn't make fake confessions...but now you "can't trust Durham"...because of some contrived nonsense from the distant past where he acknowledged that saving countless American lives by aggressively interrogating foreign terrorists captured on the battlefield (who don't even HAVE rights under our Constitution) was legal?
For the record, the fact that Obama was even attempting to criminalize and persecute Bush-era attorneys in the first place for rendering different opinions than his on where to draw that line merely further highlights what a Constitution-shredding tyrannical psychopath he was with zero boundaries.
But, as with ALL your diversionary smokescreens, none of this is relevant. No one is asking you to take anyone's word for anything. You don't HAVE to trust Durham. The case has already repeatedly been laid out in front of you with tons of links to articles with other links to independently verifiable proof embedded within them (see the op).
Literally all you have to do to not have to take anyone's word for anything is click on them...like a person concerned with the truth would do.
You truly are a one-trick pony: I can't defend my bullshit, so insult and lie about other people's sources as if anyone is asking you to take anyone's word for anything.
Complete and utter horse shit.
2) Who is it that you DO trust then? Oh wait, your trusted sources include...Mother Jones?
Were there no articles available from Occupy Wall Street, Daily Kos, or the National Enquirer?
3) In fact, let's examine the claims made by your "trustworthy" sources.
-Your sources knowingly lied to misrepresent Hillary-funded fabrications and misinformation as legitimate FBI evidence to frame a sitting U.S. president as a secret Russian agent. It completely fell apart under scrutiny and went nowhere.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources were caught lyingabout President Trump telling people to inject Lysol.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources deliberately lied to ruin the life of a child with smear campaigns, slander, and death threats for wearing a MAGA hat while politely smiling at a deranged left-wing hysteric who got in his face. They were forced to pay a settlement for their lies.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources outright lied about a drug that had been proven safe and effective against coronaviruses for 50 years straight (Hydroxchloroquine) suddenly somehow being "untested" and "dangerous." They destroyed the lives of experts who proved them wrong and killed thousands of people to to push a partisan agenda. They even reversed course and finally admitted what the science had shown all along once they were finished using COVID to force through mail-in voting to steal the presidency.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources intentionally lied to misrepresent President Trump's acknowledgement that most Americans opposed the left's ignorant Neanderthal cult practice of tearing down art, history, and monuments for not being "woke" enough...as him calling white supremacists "very fine people."
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources knew for a fact that Roy Moore was not a pedophile, but deliberately lied about him being one anyway to steal an election for Democrats.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources intentionally lied to ruin the life of a child for not letting Antifa terrorists murder him. Every charge the scandalously corrupt Democrat District Attorney could fabricate to criminalize self-defense was unanimously laughed out of court.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources relentlessly lied their corrupt asses off to smear Kavanaugh as a gang rapist.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources blatantly lied about President Trump having protesters gassed so he could do a photo op in front of a church. The IG report completely debunked this widely repeated Democrat falsehood.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources falsely falsely propped upthe now thoroughly debunked Jussie Smollett hoax.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources dishonestly scaremongered people into thinking that repealing Obama's illegal, innovation-stifling Internet takeover ('Net Neutrality') was "hastening the death of the Internet" and blatantly lied with sleazy, wildly inaccurate headlines such as "So long to the Internet." The repeal happened, and nothing about the Internet changed at all.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources straight-up lied to ruin the lives of a Missouri couple for holding off violent BLM terrorists once they had already broken onto their home property, started destroying things, and used lynch mob tactics to intimidate them out of their rights for being white. The scandalously corrupt Democrat prosecutor had to be removed from the case and the governor had to get involved and pardon the completely innocent couple to undo this egregious abuse of power.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources lied to downplay Biden bragging on video about blackmailing the Ukraine into firing the prosecutor in his son's corruption investigation, and then lied to stage an impeachment witch hunt against President Trump for trying to investigate Biden's already proven corruption. The witch hunt naturally failed.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
Not only did your sources invent gossipy fact-free nonsense to persecute imaginary Trump corruption while ignoring actual, proven Biden corruption, but they also deceptively edited video to smear people, lied by only "fact-checking" conservatives, contradicted years of their own reporting showing that Ukraine had plotted against Trump, and were caught in 75 separate lies.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources endlessly lied about the police to falsely demonize and defund them, while also lying about defunding them, and then lied to deny the direct cause-and-effect relationship between Democrats releasing criminals, mass murderers, and terrorists, legalizing theft, and lowering penalties for murdering police officers...and the 100% preventable nationwide crime epidemic that naturally, unmistakably resulted.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources lie to conceal Democrat-incited hate crimes made possible by Democrats repeatedly released violent career criminals.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources followed the lead of Biden and Obama's corrupt DHS in lying to smear peaceful Tea Party protesters as terrorists who were at war with America for preferring fiscal sanity, then reversed course and lied about hundreds of violent Democrat terrorist attacks being "peaceful protests," then lied about one single non-violent act of trespassing where elderly people took selfies in the Capitol (apparently staged by the FBI) as some Pearl Harbor-level terrorist insurrection.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources lied with more than 40 separate scaremongering anti-science global warming doomsday predictions that all spectacularly failed to ever materialize.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources used obscenely dishonest, discredited, and debunked SPLC propaganda to prop up absurd false narratives smearing innocent people and suppressing evidence of Democrat bigotry and extremism.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources rushed in and blatantly lied to misrepresent video evidence of Planned Parenthood selling murdered baby parts for profit as "deceptively edited," repeating the outright lie ad nauseum until the bombshell scandal was drowned out by a blur of smear campaign noise.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources lied to smear President Trump as putting kids in cages at the border (you also get separated from your kids when you bring them to bank robberies or other crimes), deliberately misrepresenting an Obama policy as Trump's.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources intentionally lied to smear a temporary pause in importing un-vettable terror state "refugees" as a "Muslim ban."
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources deliberately lied to make President Trump look like he mocked a disabled reporter based on a mannerism that he uses to describe everyone he criticizes.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources flat-out lied about President Trump calling immigrants "animals" when he was unmistakably clearly referring to violent foreign gangs instead.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources blatantly lied about Obama's scandal-plagued administration being "scandal-free."
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources willfully misinformed the public into believing that you could keep your doctor and insurance under Obamacare, despite all the evidence showing the opposite.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources lied to misinform people into thinking that Obamacare would never be used to fund abortions or health care for illegal immigrants. They even smeared conservatives as uncivilized and called for them to be punished for correctly calling that an outright lie. Both happened, exactly as your sources said they never would.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources were caught lying to smear President Trump as using a Nazi eagle symbol, lying to smear President Trump as using a Nazi triangle symbol, and lying to smear President Trump as using a Nazi anthem?
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources invented a flat-out lie about President Trump calling soldiers "losers" and "suckers" based on literally zero evidence, from an anonymous source (of course), while all 21 witnesses who were in the room at the time, including never-Trumper John Bolton, unanimously agree that nothing like that ever happen.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
-Your sources lied about President Trump ignoring Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers. All the evidence shows that President Trump was never briefed. Your sources literally just made the entire thing up out of thin air.
My sources were proven right, yours lied
Your sources constantly turn out to be lying, mine constantly turn out to be vindicated.
This diversionary "attack the source" fallacy is designed to avoid having to discuss whether or not the claim is true by stigmatizing sources that bring up any other side of the story, because their evidence is unassailable and devastating.
Next bullshit avoidance tactic please.
Last edited:
Tom is notably naïve. There's no proof whatsoever that lizard lips "makes guitars" at all that I'm aware of.
I suspect the best the Geico goop goobler can hope for is to avoid "making number one and two" in his Depends™ daily.
Thaddeus Martel
Verified User
1) What are you six years old?
This infantile taunting and talking past the hard proof already posted doesn't just magically make it all disappear. You don't get anywhere by pretending it away and talking past it all. That just further highlights your dishonesty and desperation.
2) Yes, you continuing to carefully avoid all the hard evidence already posted is ME being threatened...by the guy who had to rush in and shut down four Democrat-run battleground states at the finish line of a landslide defeat and reopen them all hours later with a literally mathematically impossible complete reversal in the results.
ExpressLane
Verified User
So I guess ukulele are out too.
Thaddeus Martel
Verified User
Have you EVER come up with a SINGLE response of ANY kind that was not a whataboutism fallacy?
The only thing smoking are the people that think Durham's filing is evidence of any criminal activity by Clinton or her campaign.
Durham makes no such claim and he doesn't make that claim for a very real reason. It would be a violation of his prosecutorial duties to claim a crime when he has no evidence.
It seems likely that the only thing lizard lips has ever strummed was inspired by the sight of an unwound G string on a porn site.
ROFLMAO. 12 jurors are going to decide what? If you are insane and a threat to yourself?
12 jurors will never see a case claiming Hillary spied on Trump because there is no evidence of that happening let alone of a crime that could be charged and brought to a jury.
First reason is any crimes committed in 2016 are now past the statute of limitations so they can't be brought. Second reason is no court will allow a trial to occur without evidence of a crime.