Science from the other side of Climate Change

[Into the Night]

Let's put this in perspective. Anthropocentric catastrophic global climate change is a positive assertion. It incurs a burden of proof to whoever asserts it.

No, it's not even English. Climate cannot change. There is no such thing as a 'global climate'.

 

[ZenMode]

A lie is not the truth.

Correct. Thanks?

 

[ZenMode]

Then why do you try to give them meaning?

I'm not giving random numbers meaning. You can't magically make numbers random just by saying they are.

 

[ZenMode]

There is no 'misusing' them. These theories are what they are. You simply choose to ignore them.

You can misuse laws of science just as you can misuse mathematical equaltions. Misusing laws of science is what you are doing.

Random phrases. No apparent coherency. Denial of self argument. Irrational.

Your incoherency isn't my issue.

 

[Into the Night]

If the average C13/C12 ratio of the other potential sources was within the error of measurement for the C13/C12 ratio of the additional atmospheric carbon then those sources cannot be ruled out regardless of whether the C13/C12 ratios of man-released carbon also match.

Carbon has no identifier. Carbon is not in the atmosphere (except temporarily as particles of soot).

 

[Into the Night]

Better luck next time.You wouldn't know science if it were licking your balls right now.Inversion fallacy fallacy.Where is the circular argument?

Random phrases. Insult fallacy. RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

I'm not giving random numbers meaning. You can't magically make numbers random just by saying they are.

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

 

[Into the Night]

You can misuse laws of science just as you can misuse mathematical equaltions. Misusing laws of science is what you are doing.

You can't misuse mathematics either. You just want to deny theories of science and mathematics.

Your incoherency isn't my issue.

DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEM ON ME OR ANYBODY ELSE!

 

[ZenMode]

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

I'm not. You can't.ame numbers random by really, really, really wishing they were.

 

[ZenMode]

You can't misuse mathematics either. You just want to deny theories of science and mathematics.

DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEM ON ME OR ANYBODY ELSE!

Again, you can misuse a specific equatio by using it where it doesn't work.

I have no problems to blame anyone for.

 

[Into the Night]

I'm not.

Blatant lie. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR POSTS!

You can't.ame numbers random by really, really, really wishing they were.

Attempted negative proof fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Again, you can misuse a specific equatio by using it where it doesn't work.

I have no problems to blame anyone for.

Equations cannot be misused. You simply want to ignore them.

 

[ZenMode]

Equations cannot be misused. You simply want to ignore them.

They can be misused. Try applying Pythagorean theorem to a straight line.

 

[ZenMode]

Blatant lie. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR POSTS!

Attempted negative proof fallacy.

It's not attempted anything. You can wish upon a star for some numbers to be random, but that doesn't work.

Back to the drawing board!

 

[Into the Night]

It's not attempted anything.

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

You can wish upon a star for some numbers to be random, but that doesn't work.

Attempted negative proof fallacy.

Back to the drawing board!

Cliche fallacy.

 

[Taichiliberal]

POST #45, dear readers. A simple question using basic reality that our resident climate change deniers will twist into pretzels before answering it honestly.

 

[ADreamOfLiberty]

POST #45, dear readers. A simple question using basic reality that our resident climate change deniers will twist into pretzels before answering it honestly.

How is this for a pretzel? There is no question in this post:

Bottom line: natural stabilizing doesn't account for about 3 centuries of increasing artificial deforestation, urbanization and industrial pollution of the air and water on a global scale. The latter greatly effects the former, whether the myopic research of climate change deniers accept it or not.

Your skills in grammar match your scientific insight.

 

[ZenMode]

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

Attempted negative proof fallacy.

Cliche fallacy.

You realize that all of your "fallacy" stuff is just an avoidance tool, right? You want to be able to make declarations, based on your ignorance and beliefs, and then avoid conversation with deflection.

 

[Into the Night]

POST #45, dear readers. A simple question using basic reality that our resident climate change deniers will twist into pretzels before answering it honestly.

See POST #47.
Climate cannot change.

 

[Into the Night]

They can be misused. Try applying Pythagorean theorem to a straight line.

Sure. All three sides of a right triangle are straight lines. I use it quite a lot. Apparently you aren't aware of the characteristics of a triangle.