Science from the other side of Climate Change

What are some examples of my eco-fascist doom views?

Same as you. Got it.So that more people will become scientifically literate and see both sides.I would point out that you've been using religion wrong, but you just make up your own definitions of words, anyway.
you're keeping hope alive for their stupidity with your stupidity.
 
You are the one that claims the photos were taken in "different months."
I don't care if you believe me or not. It is not part of your affirmative argument.

I put up a pair of photos of an Alaskan glacier that in a century has receded about 1.5 miles (or about 8,000 feet) at a rate of about 80 feet a year.
The glacier is not the climate. Shouldn't you first learn what a climate is before you start pointing to glaciers and calling them "climates"? What will you be calling a "climate" next? The ground? Clouds? In fact, why don't you show pictures of the same place with different cloud cover and claim that the "climate" changed? Why don't you show pics of the same place on both a clear, sunny day and on a rainy day, and claim that the "climate" has changed?

Why don't you try that?
 
Which one? There are millions on this planet ... and none have changed in my lifetime.



You are babbling, and you are the science-denier in this equation. You believe that your WACKY religion is thettled thienth. Too funny.
Are you saying the ice age wasn't a climate change?
 
Back
Top