Science from the other side of Climate Change

[IBDaMann]

Classes of people = scientists.

It is a fallacy to treat a class as an instance of that class.

You have no idea what I just said, right? I'm not going to explain it to you either.

Who do you think came up with the laws you wrongly cling to?

Instances of the class, not the class.

You're completely lost, arent' you?

 

[IBDaMann]

"Neither Into the Night nor I point to people. "

Who do you think came up with the laws that you cling to? Do you think they drifted down from the heavens on gold plates?

See my previous post. We'll call this the ZenMode class error.

By the way, ask me how I know that you aren't an object oriented programmer, object oriented designer, Model Based System Engineer or UML/SysML expert.

 

[Litmus]

There is nothing to measure.

well you can take a lot of measurements. what it means is something else.

 

[ZenMode]

It is a fallacy to treat a class as an instance of that class.

You have no idea what I just said, right? I'm not going to explain it to you either.


Instances of the class, not the class.

You're completely lost, arent' you?

"Instances" meaning "anything instance of science from a scientist that doesn't fit your politics."

I get it.

 

[IBDaMann]

I get it.

Obviously not.

Is there anything that you know?

 

[ZenMode]

See my previous post. We'll call this the ZenMode class error.

By the way, ask me how I know that you aren't an object oriented programmer, object oriented designer, Model Based System Engineer or UML/SysML expert.

Yes, you have two classes: scientists who align with your politics and scientists who don't.

 

[ZenMode]

Obviously not.

Is there anything that you know?

You preach that scientists aren't science while you are referencing laws that came from scientists. You are blind to your own delusion. That is not my issue. I see it and I get it.

 

[Daylight63]

well you can take a lot of measurements. what it means is something else.

It's fun to see people who haven't been in a science lab since high school talk about "measurements". LOL.

 

[IBDaMann]

Yes, you have two classes: scientists who align with your politics and scientists who don't.

Nope. One class with an value property. You aren't going to do well on this topic until you learn the fundamental concepts.

 

[IBDaMann]

You preach that scientists aren't science

While that is correct, the credit for stating that belongs to Into the Night.

while you are referencing laws that came from scientists.

The origin of any law of science is irrelevant. Stefan-Boltzmann is a mere mathematical derivation. Your clergy is not science. You are blind to your own delusion.

 

[ZenMode]

Nope. One class with an value property. You aren't going to do well on this topic until you learn the fundamental concepts.

The value added property is based on your politics.

 

[ZenMode]

While that is correct, the credit for stating that belongs to Into the Night.


The origin of any law of science is irrelevant. Stefan-Boltzmann is a mere mathematical derivation. Your clergy is not science. You are blind to your own delusion.

Of course "my" view is clergy and not science. It opposes your politics.

You've been exposed. Accept it for what it is.

 

[Litmus]

It's fun to see people who haven't been in a science lab since high school talk about "measurements". LOL.

it's fun to watch you be a retarded anti-human cum rag.

 

[Litmus]

Of course "my" view is clergy and not science. It opposes your politics.

You've been exposed. Accept it for what it is.

no.

it's grasping at straws and idiocy.

 

[IBDaMann]

The value added property is based on your politics.

Just "value property" ... not "value-added property" or "value proposition." It's based on a particular value.

 

[ZenMode]

Just "value property" ... not "value-added property" or "value proposition." It's based on a particular value.

Yes, value based on your politics.

 

[IBDaMann]

It's fun to see people who haven't been in a science lab since high school talk about "measurements". LOL.

It's fun to see people who have no idea how the NIST defines "measurement" and treats uncertainty pretend to discuss it.

 

[IBDaMann]

Yes, value based on your politics.

How do you have that enumerated?

 

[IBDaMann]

Okay, if climate remains the same, then why did the glacier recede by a mile-and-a-half in a century?

 

[IBDaMann]

Are you saying science cannot be used to explain the past?

Correct. Science is a tool to predict nature, i.e. a given cause will have a given effect. Science does not predict the past.