Science rejects Dems' delusional mutilation of children to encourage mental illness

artichoke

Verified User
Imagine that. Irreversibly mutilating and poisoning a child to encourage mental illness (the equivalent of helping an Anorexic starve themselves further, violating the Hippocratic Oath) really DOESN'T do anything but make them more depressed and insane (hence the high post-'transition' suicide rate). The anti-science left (as I recently demonstrated here) humiliated by facts and reality some more.

“While this comparison was performed retrospectively and was not part of the original research question given that several other factors may differ between the groups,” the correction said, “the results demonstrated no advantage of surgery in relation to subsequent mood or anxiety disorder-related health care visits or prescriptions or hospitalizations following suicide attempts in that comparison.”

Twitter users called attention to the fact that the study’s abstract with “strong” conclusion is not under a paywall, though the correction itself is.

“The original abstract remains public yet the letters of dissent and the correction is paywalled,” tweeted one user. “That is not fair. People need access to the arguements [sic].”

Astounding and unethical to put the correction behind a paywall, APA,” another user tweeted.


Psychiatric Journal Corrects Transgender Study, Now Says There’s ‘No Advantage Of Surgery’ For Mental Health

genes gender.jpg
 
Imagine that. Irreversibly mutilating and poisoning a child to encourage mental illness (the equivalent of helping an Anorexic starve themselves further, violating the Hippocratic Oath) really DOESN'T do anything but make them more depressed and insane (hence the high post-'transition' suicide rate). The anti-science left (as I recently demonstrated here) humiliated by facts and reality some more.

“While this comparison was performed retrospectively and was not part of the original research question given that several other factors may differ between the groups,” the correction said, “the results demonstrated no advantage of surgery in relation to subsequent mood or anxiety disorder-related health care visits or prescriptions or hospitalizations following suicide attempts in that comparison.”

Twitter users called attention to the fact that the study’s abstract with “strong” conclusion is not under a paywall, though the correction itself is.

“The original abstract remains public yet the letters of dissent and the correction is paywalled,” tweeted one user. “That is not fair. People need access to the arguements [sic].”

Astounding and unethical to put the correction behind a paywall, APA,” another user tweeted.


Psychiatric Journal Corrects Transgender Study, Now Says There’s ‘No Advantage Of Surgery’ For Mental Health

View attachment 16442

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-caller/
 


View attachment 16443

Repeating this diversionary "Democrat 'fact-checkers' smeared your source, therefore the claim must be invalid" fallacy will get you nowhere. Are you saying the CLAIM is false? No. You're just changing the subject to avoid debate.

View attachment 16444

Next. :cool:

I didn't say the claim was true or false. I said the source can't be trusted. If you'd like to find a real source for this claim, feel free.
 
The primary source was a medical journal.

giphy.webp
 
I didn't say the claim was true or false. I said the source can't be trusted.

Nobody said otherwise, dumb-ass. Learn how to read. Pointing out your dishonest and invalid diversions and fallacies isn't claiming that you claimed the medical journal was wrong. It's claiming that you're dishonestly avoiding the debate by being a partisan hack.

200w.webp


 


Biased ones at that, and to prop up invalid "attack the source" fallacies too. :bs:

Wonder what's going on here? :thinking: The APA hasn't explained why they did this.

"Twitter users called attention to the fact that the study’s abstract with “strong” conclusion is not under a paywall, though the correction itself is.


“The original abstract remains public yet the letters of dissent and the correction is paywalled...”
 
Back
Top