Science rejects Dems' delusional mutilation of children to encourage mental illness

[StoneByStone]

Nobody said otherwise, dumb-ass. Learn how to read. Pointing out your dishonest and invalid diversions and fallacies isn't claiming that you claimed the medical journal was wrong. It's claiming that you're dishonestly avoiding the debate by being a partisan hack.

#deflection

 

[StoneByStone]

You didn't HAVE to say anything about Democrat sources in order for Democrat sources to be the only sources you ill accept, dumb-ass. Try to keep up.

Do you think I'm a Democrat?

 

[christiefan915]

Medical journals are not "Tucker Carlson," dishonest demagogue. Next impotent lie please.

The Daily Caller is not a medical journal, dummy. And the real medical journal put its correction behind a paywall, which is extremely dishonest.

 

[artichoke]

I'm being a crybaby for wanting a reliable source?

For avoiding the debate by crying about WHO POINTED OUT the medical journal making the claim. YES, that ABSOLUTELY IS you being a dishonest crybaby, dishonest crybaby.

 

[StoneByStone]

For avoiding the debate by crying about WHO POINTED OUT the medical journal making the claim. YES, that ABSOLUTELY IS you being a dishonest crybaby, dishonest crybaby.

#deflection

 

[artichoke]

Wonder what's going on here? The APA hasn't explained why they did this.

"Twitter users called attention to the fact that the study’s abstract with “strong” conclusion is not under a paywall, though the correction itself is.


“The original abstract remains public yet the letters of dissent and the correction is paywalled,”

https://twitter.com/x/status/1290755025384464386

. "

Probably for the same reason the NY Times runs hundreds of front-page stories smearing, for example, the Duke Lacrosse team and then quietly runs their admission that they knew for an entire year that the team was innocent WHILE they lied about them...on page 27b a single time. Humiliation coupled with dishonest corruption and bias.

 

[artichoke]

#deflection

Calling out your diversions is now deflection.

New level of deflection mastery achieved.

 

[artichoke]

Do you think I'm a Democrat?

Only 99%, just like Frank Apisa, that way you can play this childish game of indignantly demanding that you're not one the moment someone treats you like what you are.

 

[artichoke]

The Daily Caller is not a medical journal, dummy.

Nobody said they were, ACTUAL dummy.

And the real medical journal put its correction behind a paywall, which is extremely dishonest.

Agreed. The people propping up your hoaxes are OFTEN total shitbags.

Thanks for acknowledging.

 

[artichoke]

#deflection

#deflection

 

[christiefan915]

Probably for the same reason the NY Times runs hundreds of front-page stories smearing, for example, the Duke Lacrosse team and then quietly runs their admission that they knew for an entire year that the team was innocent WHILE they lied about them...on page 27b a single time. Humiliation coupled with dishonest corruption and bias.

The Duke lacrosse team story from 2006?
I guess this shows that you had to hit the wayback machine to find a counterpoint to my post.

 

[StoneByStone]

Only 99%, just like Frank Apisa, that way you can play this childish game of indignantly demanding that you're not one the moment someone treats you like what you are.

I must say, this is news to me. I dislike both parties, neither one of them have my politics, but somehow that makes me a Democrat?

 

[artichoke]

The Duke lacrosse team story from 2006?
I guess this shows that you had to hit the wayback machine to find a counterpoint to my post.

Just the first thing that came to mind. They go on about imaginary white-on-black crimes for DECADES while ignoring ACTUAL black-on-white crimes at every turn. If DEMOCRATS are going to live that badly in the past (and in fake news), then it's perfectly valid for OTHERS to bring up the same race hoaxes they endlessly hyperventilate over. Example: We're STILL hearing about the Central Park Five.

 

[artichoke]

The Duke lacrosse team story from 2006?
I guess this shows that you had to hit the wayback machine to find a counterpoint to my post.

Just the first thing that came to mind. They go on about imaginary white-on-black crimes for DECADES while ignoring ACTUAL black-on-white crimes at every turn. If DEMOCRATS are going to live that badly in the past (and in fake news), then it's perfectly valid for OTHERS to bring up the same race hoaxes they endlessly hyperventilate over. Example: We're STILL hearing about the Central Park Five. If you need more recent examples, they can be provided (so you can ignore them too), so next dishonest deflection please.



Corporate Media Completely Ignored Story of Mother Killed by Black Lives Matter

 

[artichoke]

I must say, this is news to me. I dislike both parties, neither one of them have my politics, but somehow that makes me a Democrat?

Ah, so now we're CLINGING to this tired old bullshit game. DESPERATE to avoid the topic here, aren't you.

 

[artichoke]

Three pages of leftists avoiding the topic. Very revealing.

 

[christiefan915]

Just the first thing that came to mind. They go on about imaginary white-on-black crimes for DECADES while ignoring ACTUAL black-on-white crimes at every turn. If DEMOCRATS are going to live that badly in the past (and in fake news), then it's perfectly valid for OTHERS to bring up the same race hoaxes they endlessly hyperventilate over. Example: We're STILL hearing about the Central Park Five.

You have your messiah trump to thank for the continued posting about the Central Park Five. If he couldn't admit that he was wrong in proclaiming their guilt, he should have just kept his mouth shut when they were exonerated by the real perp's DNA.

 

[artichoke]

You have your messiah trump...

You people literally had school children singing songs of worship about Obama. THAT'S what messiah cult worship looks like.

...to thank for the continued posting about the Central Park Five.

How many decades were they still posting about that before President Trump was even elected?

 

[christiefan915]

Just the first thing that came to mind. They go on about imaginary white-on-black crimes for DECADES while ignoring ACTUAL black-on-white crimes at every turn. If DEMOCRATS are going to live that badly in the past (and in fake news), then it's perfectly valid for OTHERS to bring up the same race hoaxes they endlessly hyperventilate over. Example: We're STILL hearing about the Central Park Five. If you need more recent examples, they can be provided (so you can ignore them too), so next dishonest deflection please.



Corporate Media Completely Ignored Story of Mother Killed by Black Lives Matter

This article is from an actual source, not a spinmeister. Both groups were armed, both groups were talking shite and a woman got killed because of it. She didn't deserve to die. The rest of them shouldn't have resorted to gunfire over a verbal altercation.

"While details from police have been scant, Doty-Whitaker’s family has made statements to the media detailing their account of the lead up to the shooting.

Jose Ramirez, Doty-Whitaker’s fiancé, told Fox59 that he and his future wife were hanging out with two other people on the canal. He said someone in their group used a slang version of the N-word, which prompted a confrontation with a group of strangers.

Ramirez claims that the people who confronted them shouted "Black lives matter" during the argument. In response, either Doty-Whitaker or someone in her group replied by saying "all lives matter."

Ramirez said in the Fox59 interview the two groups separated because they realized people in each group were armed. He said both groups then fist-bumped and went their separate ways. But someone opened fire from a nearby bridge and struck Doty-Whitaker, Ramirez said. He said the shooters then ran away. Ramirez said he fired back but did not hit anyone.

When contacted by IndyStar, members of Doty-Whitaker's family declined interview requests.

Indianapolis police have not commented on or confirmed this version of events.

https://www.indystar.com/story/news...what-we-know-shooting-along-canal/5486333002/

 

[T. A. Gardner]

I long for the day when citing ‘fact checkers‘ ceases to be a counter argument.

Using a "fact checker" is like using an opinion piece. It has no more or less validity than the facts contained within it which are often cherry picked to give a result.