Even the so called top medical journals like the Lancet now routinely push Regime propaganda....Bret and Heather talk about this a lot.
Scientific American makes presidential endorsement for only the second time in its 179-year history
- Thread starter signalmankenneth
- Start date
ThatOwlWoman
Leftist Vermin
Wish I could fit all that under my screen name. Lol
ThatOwlWoman
Leftist Vermin
Right, like you ever even touched an issue, let alone read it. Bwahahaha!
serendipity
Verified User
The Lancet lost a lot of credibility for publishing the wildly exaggerated Johns Hopkin's report on Iraq.
Number Crunching
Let us take another look at the Lancet study. This is the report, issued by a team from Johns Hopkins University and published in the current issue of...
There are so many examples of how the top science/medical journals are corrupt crap.The Lancet lost a lot of credibility for its appalling, and wildly exaggerated, report on Iraq.
Number Crunching
Let us take another look at the Lancet study. This is the report, issued by a team from Johns Hopkins University and published in the current issue of...slate.com
ThatOwlWoman
Leftist Vermin
And we must always follow the wisdom of these two paid propagandists who don't believe a word of the swill they feed your eager, empty skull. Lol
Says the narrative warrior who will say anything, you have so little respect for us, you are so shit.
Well,.....I guess thats it!A top science magazine has waded into the political sphere after making a presidential endorsement, only the second in its 179-year history.
“Vote for Kamala Harris to Support Science, Health and the Environment,” read the headline in Scientific American on Monday, announcing the publication’s official support for the Democratic presidential candidate.
Harris is Scientific American’s second presidential endorsement in its history, after the magazine backed President Joe Biden during the 2020 election.
“The US faces two futures,” the editors wrote, pushing one candidate who “offers the country better prospects, relying on science, solid evidence and the willingness to learn from experience.”
They continued: “In the other future, the new president endangers public health and safety and rejects evidence, preferring instead nonsensical conspiracy fantasies.”
Scientific American, which has a global readership of six million, cited Harris’s record as vice president, senator and presidential candidate as reasons for endorsing her.
They acknowledged that Trump, “also has a record - a disastrous one,” during his time in the White House.
The magazine firstly focused on the candidates’ healthcare policies and proposals, in particular, health insurance in its comparison.
Praising the Biden-Harris administration for bolstering the Affordable Care Act (ACA) - which expanded the number of adults eligible for health insurance - the editors noted that while Harris has said she would expand the program, Trump has pledged to repeal it but failed to clarify what he would replace it with.
“I have concepts of a plan,” he said while facing off against Harris during the September 10 presidential debate.
The article refers to the debate multiple times, seemingly agreeing with many across the political spectrum (including some of Trump’s closest allies) that Harris won.
The article highlights Trump’s baseless claim during the debate that some states allow a person to obtain an abortion in the ninth month of pregnancy, and calling it “execution after birth.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/scientific-american-makes-presidential-endorsement-135754693.html
View attachment 31794
Good for them. Trump and the age of MAGA consistently, compulsively, and sadly try during every moment of every day to overturn the lessons of the Enlightenment. These are uneducated, dangerous, shortsighted people. It's terrifying that science and medicine have to step into a presidential election and say, "That guy is fucked up and doesn't know anything. Run away."A top science magazine has waded into the political sphere after making a presidential endorsement, only the second in its 179-year history.
“Vote for Kamala Harris to Support Science, Health and the Environment,” read the headline in Scientific American on Monday, announcing the publication’s official support for the Democratic presidential candidate.
Harris is Scientific American’s second presidential endorsement in its history, after the magazine backed President Joe Biden during the 2020 election.
“The US faces two futures,” the editors wrote, pushing one candidate who “offers the country better prospects, relying on science, solid evidence and the willingness to learn from experience.”
They continued: “In the other future, the new president endangers public health and safety and rejects evidence, preferring instead nonsensical conspiracy fantasies.”
Scientific American, which has a global readership of six million, cited Harris’s record as vice president, senator and presidential candidate as reasons for endorsing her.
They acknowledged that Trump, “also has a record - a disastrous one,” during his time in the White House.
The magazine firstly focused on the candidates’ healthcare policies and proposals, in particular, health insurance in its comparison.
Praising the Biden-Harris administration for bolstering the Affordable Care Act (ACA) - which expanded the number of adults eligible for health insurance - the editors noted that while Harris has said she would expand the program, Trump has pledged to repeal it but failed to clarify what he would replace it with.
“I have concepts of a plan,” he said while facing off against Harris during the September 10 presidential debate.
The article refers to the debate multiple times, seemingly agreeing with many across the political spectrum (including some of Trump’s closest allies) that Harris won.
The article highlights Trump’s baseless claim during the debate that some states allow a person to obtain an abortion in the ninth month of pregnancy, and calling it “execution after birth.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/scientific-american-makes-presidential-endorsement-135754693.html
View attachment 31794
What is it?
That doesn't math. Congratulations to Scientific American for calling out the cult leader as a galactic idiot and you for proving that his followers are even worse.
Name some.
Trump is severely, grossly obese. What is Harris's BMI?
There you go! Good boy! Neither is this endorsement political. It's scientific. Harris can comprehend science. Trump can't tie a shoelace.
What do you know about Americans?
How are you still alive? Seek professional help.
serendipity
Verified User
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Even though I subscribe to Sci American, this is just one more reason to ignore something like 80% of what the put in the magazine. The non-political portions--a distinct minority of the magazine today--are still worthwhile. The rest is utter and complete rubbish.A top science magazine has waded into the political sphere after making a presidential endorsement, only the second in its 179-year history.
“Vote for Kamala Harris to Support Science, Health and the Environment,” read the headline in Scientific American on Monday, announcing the publication’s official support for the Democratic presidential candidate.
Harris is Scientific American’s second presidential endorsement in its history, after the magazine backed President Joe Biden during the 2020 election.
“The US faces two futures,” the editors wrote, pushing one candidate who “offers the country better prospects, relying on science, solid evidence and the willingness to learn from experience.”
They continued: “In the other future, the new president endangers public health and safety and rejects evidence, preferring instead nonsensical conspiracy fantasies.”
Scientific American, which has a global readership of six million, cited Harris’s record as vice president, senator and presidential candidate as reasons for endorsing her.
They acknowledged that Trump, “also has a record - a disastrous one,” during his time in the White House.
The magazine firstly focused on the candidates’ healthcare policies and proposals, in particular, health insurance in its comparison.
Praising the Biden-Harris administration for bolstering the Affordable Care Act (ACA) - which expanded the number of adults eligible for health insurance - the editors noted that while Harris has said she would expand the program, Trump has pledged to repeal it but failed to clarify what he would replace it with.
“I have concepts of a plan,” he said while facing off against Harris during the September 10 presidential debate.
The article refers to the debate multiple times, seemingly agreeing with many across the political spectrum (including some of Trump’s closest allies) that Harris won.
The article highlights Trump’s baseless claim during the debate that some states allow a person to obtain an abortion in the ninth month of pregnancy, and calling it “execution after birth.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/scientific-american-makes-presidential-endorsement-135754693.html
View attachment 31794