You are right, faith isn't science. This is exactly why I presented scientific evidence of God, it is more powerful than faith to some. I don't believe I have absconded my own branch of science, can you explain that assertion? What do you mean by "YOUR science?" My science is the same as everyone else, it is universal. Science doesn't conclude, man concludes. Science only provides evidence, and that is what I presented, the evidence.
Animal behavior is science, and what I presented is observed phenomenon documented in science, pier reviewed, published in science journals, and meeting every criteria we require for something to be scientific. The only attempted explanation for why humans exhibit spirituality is they fear the unknown, but that is a speculation, and one that doesn't hold to scrutiny.
Taking the approach we take in science on virtually everything else, we must conclude that human spirituality is a fundamentally important behavior for the species. Being true to science, we must continue to ask, why is it fundamentally important to the species? There is the distinct possibility that human spirituality is important because there is something to it. Ochm's Razor says, when you have a reasonable explanation for something, that is most likely the reason. Just putting two and two together, science doesn't PROVE there is a God, it just gives us the evidence, MEN conclude.