What a load of illogical bullshit. Science is the study of natural phenomena. God, by definition, is supernatural, and there is no scientific evidence of the existence r nonexistence of the supernatural. If there was, It would not be supernatural. It isn't the atheists who can't admit they might be wrong, but the superstitious ignoramuses who try to pervert language, logic, and science to "prove" their invisible man in the sky exists. They simultaneously try to establish that a) faith is the equivalent of knowledge, and b) there is no such thing as knowledge. The incoherence of such a moronic position hasm clearly escaped them. They also talk of "subjective evidence," as if such a thing could even exist. Evidence can only be objective. Deal with it.
In the screed/rant/idiotic blather (pick one) quoted above, the author bases his/her/its specious reasoning on what logicians call the Fallacy of Division, which is the invalid conclusion that because a whole has a certain property, that all its parts must also possess that property. Specifically, the false conclusion is that since behavior writ large is genetically programmed to further the continued existence of the species exhibiting that behavior, that every behavior has survival value. Not only is this logically fallacious and invalid reasoning, it is also factually false, and exhibits a clear misunderstanding of the mechanics of natural selection. Nowhere did Darwin claim that all behaviors have survival value. Quite the contrary. He specifically touched on behaviors that are survival neutral, or even have negative survival value. The latter occur when changing environmental factors render whagt used to be a trait with a positive survival value into one that threatens the species' survival. Oh, and by the way, Einstein, populations of organisms don't "discard" traits that are disadvantageous. Those displaying the deleterious trait die and don't pass the trait on. Furthermore, the elimination of a deleterious trait doesn't occur overnight. It can take millennia for a disadvantageous trait to disappear. Take for example the kind of delusional mental incapacity required to insist not only on the existence of something for which there is not one shred of objective evidence, but also to insist upon pain of death that all others not only accept that delusion, but embrace it. If we don't believe in your invisible playmate, you claim it is because we are under the influence of your playmate's invisible enemy (which he is for some reason unable to destroy, despite allegedly being the supreme being in the universe, and the creator of both the universe and his enemy. WTF?), and apparently, this means that we must be put to death as servants of this invisible enemy we don't even believe exists, because since you are so sure he exists, and you are incapablre of being mistaken on this point, that for anyone to claim a disbelief in the enemy's existece is proof of their deception and service to the invisible enemy of your invisible playmate, so they must die. Unless of course they confess, in which case they die, but less horribly. Oh, goodie.
Trust me, the rest of us have been waiting centuries for you deluded, violent, ignorant, psychotic fucks to die off, but evolution seems to be taking its sweet time on eliminating your peculiar faulty gene. Bummer.
