Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Unconstitional laws get overturned often.
So you don't know why the 4 justices ruled in favor of the Sacketts.
SCOTUS 9-0 against EPA - Crying Chuck calls it MAGA Court despite UNANIMOUS ruling
- Thread starter Bigdog
- Start date
Unconstitional laws get overturned often.
So you don't know why the 4 justices ruled in favor of the Sacketts.
Bannon said he was making Breitbart the "the platform for the alt-right", back before the Unite the Right riot made alt right a shameful term. trump used to be proud of being alt right.
Now that the right wingnuts have destroyed the term, they claim that it was left wing all along. Just sad.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
So no quote and link for the Trump quote.
White supremacist Richard Spencer votes for Joe Bidenhttps://www.dailymail.co.uk › news › article-8912091
Nov 4, 2020 — White supremacist Richard Spencer, known for popularising the term 'alt-right', posted a picture of his ballot paper saying 'To hell with ...
EDITORIAL: A racist's endorsement of Biden comes as no ...https://gazette.com › opinion › editorial-a-racists-endorse...
Aug 26, 2020 — Neo-Nazi white supremacist Richard Spencer wholeheartedly endorses Joe Biden for president. This should surprise no one familiar with Biden ..."
Spencer is a bit slow. It took him a long time to figure out the Dem media lied to him about Donald Trump being a lifelong neo naxi skinhead.
Again, where in the Constitution does it give an immutable definition of wetlands?
The four Justices decided for the Sacketts based on the law, not on throwing away the law. Schumer did not comment on the findings in this particular case, but rather on the overturning of the law.
Richard Spencer makes bizarre claims to try to get attention. For instance, even while he was saying "heil trump", and proclaiming trump was the fuhrer for america, he was also claiming he would support Biden... It was a trick. Spencer told his supporters to support trump, and he told people who found him repugnant that he supported Biden.
Biden called out Spencer in no uncertain terms... Which is more than trump did.
trump went on to have dinner with far right Nick Fuentes, who denies the Holocaust happened, but says it should have.
Yakuda
Verified User
Did Schumer just join the AOC squad? What a partisan nutcase.
"Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., slammed the Supreme Court's ruling Thursday that limited the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate bodies of water, calling it a "MAGA" court even though the decision was 9-0.
On Thursday, the high court issued an opinion that narrowed the EPA's broad definition of Waters of the United States (WOTUS). The court said the federal government must define WOTUS as a water source with a "continuous surface connection" to major bodies of water.
The decision upended an attempt by the Biden administration to regulate wetlands, lakes, ponds, streams and other "relatively permanent" waterways, which had relied on a broad reading of the EPA's authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA). "
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/schumer-rips-maga-supreme-court-9-0-vote-epa-waters-rule
As predicted, Authoritarian Nazi Dems try to abuse Nixon's Clean Water Act.
Chuck is a dimwit.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Apparently, that definition stepped on other rights or was ridiculous.
Based on what law? So you don't know why the other 4 justices ruled in the Sacketts favor.
Schumer called the whole court MAGA. Stop lying.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Schumer's exact words were, "this MAGA Supreme Court is continuing to erode our country's environmental laws." Only five Justices voted to erode our country's environmental laws. The other four voted to preserve the laws. Schumer did not comment on the relative merits of the individual case.
Schumer called the entire court "MAGA"... this "but he really only meant it about this other part of the decision" is irrelevant.
Apparently, Justice Brown Jackson is as "MAGA" as Justice Kavanaugh (who often votes just as Schumer wants). Because the court is "MAGA" (and therefore naughty) in Schumer's eyes.
Apparently, Justice Brown Jackson is as "MAGA" as Justice Kavanaugh (who often votes just as Schumer wants). Because the court is "MAGA" (and therefore naughty) in Schumer's eyes.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Kavanaugh was appointed by Trump! ... and only 2 others.
Schumer did NOT say 5 of the 9 justices are MAGA. You are lying, Walt.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
it was a UNANIMOUS decision, meaning that all 9 justices said that the federal government overreached their authority
No, it was not. The part of the case Schumer commented on was 5-4.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
wrong. AGAIN, it was a UNANIMOUS decision that the EPA/federal government overreached. the ONLY split was redefining wetland.
The "only" split is on what Schumer was upset about.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
who the fuck cares what dumbass schumer was upset about. the only thing that's important is the decision in the text you quoted.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
The whole wetlands and "Waters of the US" as the EPA is trying to do, is so obviously, totally, insanely fucking illegal is why the Supreme Court voted 9 to 0 against it. The EPA's mandate on inland water is "navigable" waters. That is, something you can navigate a ship on. You can't do that in some pond, or intermittent stream, dry wash that runs twice a year, or little half-wet marsh on somebody's property.
In fact, some acreage I had for a long time I made sure to get an engineered hydrology study done on because of the EPA trying to get this rule into law. It was as defensive measure to show that if they did come and make some shit up I already had evidence they were wrong from a formal, professional, expert. That stops bureaucrats in their tracks. They almost always shut up and go away when you do that right up front. They don't want the fight. Instead, they find easier targets to persecute.
In fact, some acreage I had for a long time I made sure to get an engineered hydrology study done on because of the EPA trying to get this rule into law. It was as defensive measure to show that if they did come and make some shit up I already had evidence they were wrong from a formal, professional, expert. That stops bureaucrats in their tracks. They almost always shut up and go away when you do that right up front. They don't want the fight. Instead, they find easier targets to persecute.