SCOTUS opinion leaked: Roe v Wade

The average age of a child in foster care is more than 8 years old.

https://www.adoptuskids.org/meet-the-children/children-in-foster-care/about-the-children#:~:text=The%20average%20age%20of%20a,and%20some%20form%20of%20trauma.
Democrats wish they were dead.
 
It has a very lengthy bibliography of government sites. Just feed the titles into google.

I clicked on the links of those sites...every single one of them, and the links were dead.

But it doesn't really matter because there are about as many kids in the system today as there were back in 1970, when Roe was decided.

But the share of those kids as a % of the total population has declined by quite a lot as the US population grew by about 60% between 1970-2022.

For your argument to make sense, that there are double the number of kids in foster care now vs. 1970, you would have to prove that there are over 1,000,000 kids in the Foster system right now, which is patently false.

At the end of the 70's, the best estimate seems to be about 500,000 kids. Now, if that population of kids grew at the same rate the US population grew over that period, then there would have to be close to 800,000 kids in foster care today, because that would be 60% higher than the population in the 70's, right?

So the math doesn't check out here for you.
 
It has a very lengthy bibliography of government sites. Just feed the titles into google.

OK, here's the thing...

In the late 70's, after Roe was decided, there was a peak of approximately 500,000 kids in the foster care system with the total US population at 205M people. So of the 205M people in 1970, 0.24% of those people were kids in the foster care system.

In 2021, according to your estimate, there were 675,000 kids that includes kids currently in the system and kids that passed through it. So of the 330M people in 2021, 0.20% of those people were kids in the foster care system. Now, if we were to use accurate counts of the kids currently in foster care, which is the metric we used for the late 70's data, then of the 330M people in 2021, 0.12% of those people are kids in the system. So per capita, kids in the system have declined since the late 70's.

So, the number of kids didn't double, like you claimed it did, and it appears per capita that the number of kids in the system slightly DECLINED or remained stagnant.

And that's with me being generous and accepting your 675K number, when it's really closer to 400,000.
 
True and if someone had killed him at that time it would have saved a lot of life's!


You see even as a zygote Hitler could have been stopped

Because ending a zygote is taking a life....Thanks for playing you lost!



GNk2CFr.jpg
 
Now subtract 619,591 abortion in 2018 ALONE not to mention the number for 18 years and tell me how Abortion improved the Foster Care system. By your logic there should be no kids in the Foster Care system.

I just showed you how it did that using math and YOUR statistics.

In 1979, at its peak, there were about 500,000 kids in foster care and 221M people in the US, which means of the 221M people, .23% were kids in foster care.

In 2021, according to all verifiable statistics, there are about 400,000 kids in foster care and about 330M people in the US, which means of the 330M people, .12% are kids in foster care.

Now, use that pea brain of yours to solve this: Is 0.12% > or < 0.23%?
 
You obviously have not read the opinion:

Unable to show concrete reliance on Roe and Casey themselves, the Solicitor General suggests that overruling those decisions would "threaten the Court's precedents holding that the Due Process Clause protects other rights." Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 26 (citing Obergefell, Lawrence, Griswold) That is not correct for reasons we have already discussed. As even the Casey plurality recognized, "[a]bortion is a unique ad' because it terminates "life or potential life." 505 U. S., at 852; see also Roe, 410 U. S., at 159 (abortion is "inherently different from marital intimacy," "marriage," or "procreation"). And to ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right. Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion."

It makes clear it does not affect the other privacy rights.

To suggest they want to get rid of Griswold, Loving, and Brown, or bring back segregation is just chicken little drama. It is scare tactics similar to election fraud claims.

I'm old enough to remember when Flash assured everyone that there was no way they would overturn Roe because it's settled law and any talk of that was just chicken little drama.

Alito already contradicted himself in the decision, so of course those are next up to go.
 
Back
Top