Jake Starkey
Verified User
The only point you have, Yakuda, is that you don't like same sex marriage.
Who cares, other than you?
Who cares, other than you?
It's the truth, not a commentary. Gay people cannot get married in certain jurisdictions.That last part is commentary not defintional.
Sure they can. The law doesn't and has never prevented a gay person from getting married because they were gay.It's the truth, not a commentary. Gay people cannot get married in certain jurisdictions.
A deflection. We're talking about same-sex marriage.Sure they can. The law doesn't and has never prevented a gay person from getting married because they were gay.
Yup. In the language of Liberal, words effectively have no meaning whatsoever. Yes, words in that language do often have ever-changing meanings that can be conveniently utilized during any given moment, but at the very foundation, this truth effectively returns us back to the aforementioned "no meaning whatsoever" status.This is why they've spent years destroying the meaning of words.
You posted a definition aka commentary that said gays couldn't get married. That's a fucking lie and why it commentary and not definitional.A deflection. We're talking about same-sex marriage.
Yes. Slang often uses words contrary to their meaning but that doesn't strip words of their meaning.Yup. In the language of Liberal, words effectively have no meaning whatsoever. Yes, words in that language do often have ever-changing meanings that can be conveniently utilized during any given moment, but at the very foundation, this truth effectively returns us back to the aforementioned "no meaning whatsoever" status.
Um it clearly refers to same-sex marriage. Are you okay?You posted a definition aka commentary that said gays couldn't get married. That's a fucking lie and why it commentary and not definitional.
Who, of legal age, currently can't get married who wishes to get married? Please provide one single concrete example.Mary a person they WANT to marry.
So recognizing all legal unions in the same manner under the law is not equal treatment because there are different types of legal unions that happen to exist?The right to equal recognition under the law. Separate but equal isn't equality. Did you never take an American History class?
I am but you're not. The law never prevented a gay person from marrying because they were gay.Um it clearly refers to same-sex marriage. Are you okay?
This might come to you as a shock but only one particular combination of genders can result in procreation.This might come to you as a shock but homosexuals can reproduce.
Who said it did?I am but you're not. The law never prevented a gay person from marrying because they were gay.
I did.If you recall, you said to thank a Republican.
Playing dumb, aren't you? Homosexuals can reproduce with the opposite sexes.This might come to you as a shock but only one particular combination of genders can result in procreation.
In principle:
A man CAN reproduce with a woman.
A man CANNOT reproduce with a man.
A woman CANNOT reproduce with a woman.
Whether or not the man or woman "is homosexual" is irrelevant.
Which is a hilarious statement. It wins the award.I did.
Then if the law never prevented gays from marrying what are pissing and moaning about? It can't be discriminatory if the laws didnt prevent gays from marrying because they were gay.Who said it did?
^^^ Lefty is playing dumb, pretending that I didn't JUST say that.Playing dumb, aren't you? Homosexuals can reproduce with the opposite sexes.
What award?Which is a hilarious statement. It wins the award.
Playing??????.^^^ Lefty is playing dumb, pretending that I didn't JUST say that.
This is his preferred form of trolling.
Your award in your thread, silly bird.What award?