gfm7175
Mega MAGA
That was a miracle, and what made Jesus both human AND divine.
SCOTUS protects marriage equality
- Thread starter Jake Starkey
- Start date
It normalized perversion. Just one drop of lube on the slippery slope we've slid down.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
That caused the breakdown of families?
Newsflash... homosexuality has always existed. Guess what? Families are fine.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Never expect a rational answer from an irrational person. Besides, Sybil, like Joe, has markers of being in the closet. Their posts are often laced with homoeroticism. A classic sign of a repressed homosexual passing as a heterosexual.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
None needs to be offered, since marriage hasn't been denied to any consenting adult.
Redundant language.
Marriage (the institution in and of itself) is sacred before God.
That doesn't mean that people won't choose to treat marriage lighter than they aught to, or that finding love on a TV reality show is, in and of itself, a bad thing. I personally wouldn't recommend it, though.
Because God calls homosexuality "an abomination".
Because God instructed man to leave his father and mother, cleave unto his wife, and become one flesh.
I don't.
Why do you treat "homosexuals" like crap, using them as political pawns?
ZenMode
Well-known member
And how did he write them? Was it "pen" and paper? Where did he write them?
Jake Starkey
Verified User
A bad opinion. Yep.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
I believe you.
They are not married. They might be legally enjoined in a civil union (or whatever other verbiage you may prefer), but they are not enjoined together in a marriage because marriage, by definition, consists of a man and a woman.
Yup. So?
Once upon a time, I was told that this sort of thing was "all that 'homosexual' people wanted"... "Just give us civil unions", they said at the time. "It's fine if you don't call it a marriage; just call it a civil union and tax us in the same manner that married couples are taxed", they said.
It "turns out" that was a lie. It wasn't actually about the tax treatment, but rather about sexual deviancy and SUPREMACY. Nowadays, even a perceived 'wrong look' towards anyone holding the LGBTQLMNOPALPHABETSOUP+ banner means that the banner-bearer is being VICTIMIZED. Any denial of complete and total SUPREMACY is viewed as victimization. All banner-holders are considered to be eternally victimized by a never-ending supply of "homophobes", "homophobic rhetoric", "bigots", "bigotry", "Christians", "Christian Nationalism",
So?
Their only option is to adopt other people's children (since male/male and female/female relations cannot result in procreation).
Children raised in a male/male household lack the presence of a motherly figure.
Children raised in a female/female household lack the presence of a fatherly figure.
The male and female genders perfectly compliment one other, so male/male and female/female relationships lack that complimentary dynamic that is very beneficial to children.
The imitation of a marriage is not actually a marriage.
Last edited:
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
It is legally recognized as marriage. Sorry.I believe you.
They are not married. They might be legally enjoined in a civil union (or whatever other verbiage you may prefer), but they are not enjoined together in a marriage because marriage, by definition, consists of a man and a woman.
Yup. So?
Once upon a time, I was told that this sort of thing was "all that 'homosexual' people wanted"... "Just give us civil unions", they said at the time. "It's fine if you don't call it a marriage; just call it a civil union and tax us in the same manner that married couples are taxed", they said.
It "turns out" that was a lie. It wasn't actually about the tax treatment, but rather about sexual deviancy and SUPREMACY. Nowadays, even a perceived 'wrong look' towards anyone holding the LGBTQLMNOPALPHABETSOUP+ banner means that the banner-bearer is being VICTIMIZED. Any denial of complete and total SUPREMACY is viewed as victimization. All banner-holders are considered to be eternally victimized by a never-ending supply of "homophobes", "homophobic rhetoric", "bigots", "bigotry", "Christians", "Christian Nationalism",
So?
Their only option is to adopt other people's children (since male/male and female/female relations cannot result in procreation).
Children raised in a male/male household lack the presence of a motherly figure.
Children raised in a female/female household lack the presence of a fatherly figure.
The male and female genders perfectly compliment one other, so male/male and female/female relationships lack that complimentary dynamic that is very beneficial to children.
Sure, but the imitation of a marriage is not actually a marriage.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
RQAA.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Saying things that are irrational and nonsensical over and over doesn't magically make them true.
Better luck next time....
Last edited:
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
Does legally recognizing an orange as an apple magically change an orange into an apple in actuality?
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Marriage is a union between two people. That's it. That's the definition.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
Your deaf studies continue to fail you... or do you continue to fail your deaf studies?