SCOTUS protects marriage equality

I asked you this before but you didn't respond.

A marriage is just a legal agreement between two people, that is recognized by the state. It's no different than a mortgage or business license, building permit, etc.
"When everyone is super, no one will be".
Would you be ok with the government saying only a man and woman can buy a house together or open a business together? If the government can dictate the sex of one type of contract they offer, surely they could apply similar logic to all contracts, right?
Irrelevant.
 

Evidence of Jake Starkey Lacking Critical Thinking Skills​

  • Concrete Example: Jake Starkey, without utilizing any critical thinking of his own, immediately copy/pasted the "AI Overview" result that popped up at the top of his screen after conducting a web browser search and immediately treated every word that he copy/pasted as "gospel truth".
  • Literary Reference: Satirists such as @IBDaMann regularly mention and create memes about the complete lack of any critical thinking by leftists such as Jake Starkey, often mocking them, which shows that the concept is familiar enough to be satirized.
  • Terminology: The Latin word credulus (“trusting”) appears in sources describing these leftists, suggesting that Romans understood and sometimes ridiculed the leftists of their time for their inability to think critically.

📚 Comparison with Utilizing Critical Thinking​

  • Logic: The union between a man and a woman differs from a union between a man and a man (or a woman and a woman) because the aforementioned union actually CAN, in principle, produce fruit via procreation.
  • Modern Times: Today, the aforementioned logic remains the same. The union between a man and a woman is "special" compared to any other union because it is THAT union, and ONLY that union, which can produce fruit via procreation.

✅ In summary: Jake Starkey is a leftist moron who is completely incapable of any critical thought, so he immediately opens up a web browser, types in the result that he desires to see, and "AI Overview" gladly spits it out for him in outline form. He immediately gobbles it up as "gospel truth" and expects everyone else to likewise "gobble up the horseshit" as "gospel truth".
Brilliant! This is awesome! Let me catch my breath.
 
They're saying that it has to be a male and female having their relationship legally recognized.
WRONG. Stop being dishonest.

You can legally recognize whatever union you wish to legally recognize (e.g. "civil union").

I'm simply saying that it HAS to be a male and a female in order for a MARRIAGE to occur. Any tweaking of the "award-winning-formula" (man + woman = potential for procreation, in principle) changes marriage into something other than marriage.

Clancy's are NOT equivalent to Doritos.
 
I'm simply saying that it HAS to be a male and a female in order for a MARRIAGE to occur. Any tweaking of the "award-winning-formula" (man + woman = potential for procreation, in principle) changes marriage into something other than marriage.

Clancy's are NOT equivalent to Doritos.
procreation isn't a requirement for marriage. By your foolish standards, a female who has gone through menopause and sterile men, or men who have had a vasectomy, would be disallowed from marrying someone of the opposite sex.
 
WRONG. Stop being dishonest.
You know what happens when you ask the impossible.

You can legally recognize whatever union you wish to legally recognize (e.g. "civil union").
I would once again mention that the LGBTTQQIAPPIPALPHABETSOUP+ crowd demands supremacy. It doesn't matter that they can have any union recognized; they want the supremacy to destroy with impunity whatever We the People wish to protect. It doesn't matter that the LGBTTQQIAPPIPALPHABETSOUP+ crowd has complete equality throughout the Federal government, they demand supremacy so as to destroy the US military with impunity, specifically because We the People wish to protect it, because it is what protects us.
 
Back
Top