SCOTUS protects marriage equality

Again, there is no requirement to procreate to get married, therefore it is not a factor in allowing two people to enter into a legal agreement.

So, there is no reason for states to consider genitals to legally recognize a relationship.
Still trying to redefine words. It won't work, Void.
 
You're right it's not a requirement but an expected outcome. To have to decide who is fertile and who isn't would place an undue burden on the state and no law should do that. The best way to ensure a people have and support children is by encouraging the only pairing at brings about children.
Depending on the cause of infertility (if any), it can often be treated and corrected as well.
 
People with different genitals get marriage
People with the same genitals get civil union

That's separate but equal.
No. It's separate. It is not equal in any sense of the word.
You want to pretend it has something to do with procreation,
It does.
which isn't a requirement nor mentioned when giving the marriage license, because you are too dishonest to admit what this is really about.
He is quite honest. It is about your redefinition fallacies and your repetition fallacies.
 
They are refused the ability to have their relationship recognized by the state with the person they WANT it to be recognized.

And the reason it has been so difficult to get states to do the right thing is because of religion.
Marriage IS recognized by States.
 
Back
Top