SCOTUS protects marriage equality

[gfm7175]

Yes it's hilarious that I destroyed your own argument by using infertile couples as an example.

You didn't destroy anything other than your final surviving brain cell.

I've already refuted that extremely stupid position of yours.

 

[gfm7175]

@gfm7175 , I have a question for you. @ZenMode is framing your position as "inequality under the law", and I just want hit you with some questions to see if @ZenMode maybe has a point.

Under your totally Christian social order ...
1. Can a man enjoin a woman in a legal union?
- 1a. Can a woman enjoin a man in a legal union?
2. Can a man enjoin a man in a legal union?
3. Can a woman enjoin a woman in a legal union?
4. Does the legislature have legal authority to call the three types of legal union "Type A," "Type B" and "Type C" ... or whatever they want to call them because they are the elected representatives of We the People?

@ZenMode , I think we've got @gfm7175 against the ropes. There's no way he's going to answer "yes" to all of these questions, which would be the only way he could manage to maintain equality under the law. Let's watch him squirm.

1. Yes
1a. Yes
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. Yes

 

[Jake Starkey]

Those Republicans would rebuke Trump and MAGA today.

 

[Jake Starkey]

You didn't destroy anything other than your final surviving brain cell.

I've already refuted that extremely stupid position of yours.

A ProudLefty owns you all on that subject.

 

[Nordberg]

Gays have enough troubles navigating through this world without rightys taking away the rights they have fought for. It is tough when you are different than most people. God makes some people different. Why can't rightys leave them alone?

 

[ZenMode]

1. Yes
1a. Yes
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. Yes

Great response, Americini!

 

[Into the Night]

Correct and a civil union could afford them all the bennies of an actual marriage

...except children and a family.

 

[Into the Night]

Gays have enough troubles navigating through this world without rightys taking away the rights they have fought for. It is tough when you are different than most people. God makes some people different. Why can't rightys leave them alone?

What rights have gay people lost?

 

[Into the Night]

Those Republicans would rebuke Trump and MAGA today.

You can't speak for the dead, Sybil.

 

[Into the Night]

A ProudLefty owns you all on that subject.

Assumption of victory fallacy, Sybil.

 

[IBDaMann]

It's not bogus at all.

Yes, your question is a stupid subjunctive fallacy. If only you were somewhat educated you'd understand this. Homosexual men do marry women, therefore you can't ask "Why would they?" You have to ask "Why do they?"

You don't want to answer it,

I did answer it. I was happy to answer it. Some homosexual men marry women ... because they wish to, to accomplish something important, like raising a family, like presenting a certain political image, etc.

because it exposes how idiotic the claim of "gay men have the right to get married" actually is.

I don't know how stupid you have to be to see that homosexual men marry women, and to conclude that homosexual men somehow don't have the right to get married. I'm guessing that you would have to be extremely stupid. Are you saying that you are that stupid?

Nice work, Americini.

What is "Americini"?

 

[IBDaMann]

Let's apply The logic of @Yakuda @gfm7175 and @IBDaMann to voting:

Sure, but make sure you apply my logic, and don't allow your logical incompetence to erroneously present my argument.

Government: "every legally registered voter is allowed to vote for the Democratic candidate of their choice"

Government: "... also, every legally registered voter is allowed to 'elect' the Republican candidate of his choice."
Government: "... also, every legally registered voter is allowed to 'cast a YEA' for the third party candidate of his choice."

Conservatives: ...

"ELECT DONALD TRUMP! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!"

Government: "There is no issue here. Everyone has the same right to vote, [elect, or cast a Yea for the Democrat, Republican or 3rd-party] candidate of his choice."

FTFY.

 

[IBDaMann]

1. Yes
1a. Yes
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. Yes

Well hogtie me an' throw me in the fire. It would appear you are arguing for equality under the law.

@ZenMode, it looks like you are mistaken.

 

[ZenMode]

What is "Americini"?

Post in thread 'SCOTUS protects marriage equality'

Friday at 3:37 PM

By the way, nobody who bitches and gripes and snivels about having his civil union called a civil union instead of being called "marriage" has explained why the term "civil union" is somehow unacceptable.

Allow me to "dumb" it down for you...

(At the end of slavery):

US: "America will recognize all freed slaves as citizens; as one of us!"

Freed Slaves: "Yay! We are Americans"!

US: "You are CITIZENS!"

Slaves: "We are Americans! We are citizens!!"

US: "Weeeeeeell....we are going to call you Americinis...but it just like being an American!"

Slaves: "Well, if it's just like...

• ZenMode

• 

 

[ZenMode]

Sure, but make sure you apply my logic, and don't allow your logical incompetence to erroneously present my argument.


Government: "... also, every legally registered voter is allowed to 'elect' the Republican candidate of his choice."
Government: "... also, every legally registered voter is allowed to 'cast a YEA' for the third party candidate of his choice."


"ELECT DONALD TRUMP! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!"


FTFY.

An entire post for nothing except avoiding what I was saying.

 

[IBDaMann]

An entire post for nothing except avoiding what I was saying.

I directly addressed your bogus argument, and I believe I addressed your logical incompetence which prevents you from understanding counterarguments or why your bogus argument is bogus.

 

[AProudLefty]

You didn't destroy anything other than your final surviving brain cell.

You made the claim that marriage requires the ability to reproduce.

I've already refuted that extremely stupid position of yours.

Ok. What is my position?

 

[AProudLefty]

You could start off with thanking the Republicans who formed the Republican Party.

They're dead.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

You are truly confused, or just stupid

Ask him if he "aced" his cognitive exam by correctly picking out the giraffe. LOL

 

[Dutch Uncle]

You made the claim that marriage requires the ability to reproduce.

Ok. What is my position?

There is no requirement to reproduce. If there were, then why are over-50 people allowed to marry?

Only fucking morons believe reproduction is a requirement to collect Federal marriage benefits.